Beyond Trump and Harris: Why Africa must reject the neo-colonial agenda
As US citizens cast their ballots, a familiar question looms for many Africans: What will the new White House administration mean for their continent?
The choice this time around is Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, each representing a different shade of American imperialism. For Africa, the deeper question isn’t about choosing between two American faces, but about breaking free from the entire neo-colonialist agenda that for decades has shaped US-Africa relations.
Whether Trump’s ‘America First’ policy or Harris’ diplomatic rhetoric prevails, African nations must recognize these merely as tactical shifts within the same framework of American dominance, a system that has long undermined Africa’s sovereignty and autonomy.
Trump’s ‘America first’ or Harris’ ‘soft diplomacy’: The same imperial pillar
Both Trump and Harris represent two faces of the same coin. Trump’s blunt, transactional approach is straightforward: he promises less US intervention but simultaneously aims to disrupt African economies by implementing protectionist measures. He has hinted at a steep 10% import tax, which would adversely affect African exporters who rely on American markets. This approach signals a return to raw economic nationalism that would keep Africa subservient, relegating the continent to a “supplier role” in a global order without fair partnerships.
In contrast, Harris’ approach is grounded in a softer but equally constraining model of neo-colonialism. Through her insistence on human rights initiatives and green energy investments, Harris ostensibly offers Africa more “supportive” engagement. However, these investments are strategic, aimed at keeping Africa tied to American interests, while sidelining African countries’ own priorities for development. US-sponsored climate initiatives often clash with African nations’ rights to industrialize and use their natural resources in ways that support local economies. From Ghana to Tanzania, many African leaders see this green “assistance” as a Trojan horse for continued Western control.
Climate change: A convenient front for neo-colonial control
Climate change is a critical issue and Africa, responsible for less than 4% of global emissions, is suffering its worst consequences. Yet, Kamala Harris’ focus on green energy cooperation isn’t solely altruistic. By forcing African countries into Western-designed climate agreements, the US pressures the continent to adopt policies that could curtail growth in favor of Western-led environmental goals. African nations, many of which are rich in fossil fuels, are expected to curtail their resource usage while the US has historically reaped the rewards of industrialization without similar constraints.
Donald Trump’s disdain for climate initiatives represents the other extreme. His administration’s preference for fossil fuels and deregulation makes him a danger to any meaningful global climate strategy. However, under Trump, African countries could pursue their own climate solutions without interference. Neither option genuinely supports Africa’s long-term needs. Instead, African nations should look to build stronger coalitions within the African Union and alongside other Global South partners to advocate for climate justice on their terms.
The US-China rivalry: Africa as battleground
Under either a Trump or Harris presidency, Africa will continue to be a pawn in the global power struggle between the US and China. Trump’s aggressively anti-China stance has forced African countries into difficult choices, pitting them against their largest infrastructure investor. Harris may maintain a more diplomatic tone but her stance is fundamentally the same: keep China’s influence in Africa at bay, regardless of the benefits that Chinese investments bring to African nations.
With China investing billions in infrastructure, resource extraction, and technology across Africa, US leaders from both sides fear losing control over African markets. However, China’s engagement – although not without its own issues – offers an alternative to the US hegemony that has historically dictated Africa’s trade terms and economic policies. African countries must seize this opportunity to pursue a unified foreign policy that resists US hegemony, while engaging positively with rising economic, political and military powers of the Global South, from China to Russia, India and Brazil.
Aid and human rights: More tools for intervention
Both Trump and Harris are likely to continue the trend of using foreign aid and human rights as tools for controlling African states. Trump’s administration took a cold, transactional approach, often reducing aid and ignoring human-rights abuses if it suited American interests. In his worldview, foreign aid is a burden to be minimized, often leaving African nations scrambling to fill financial gaps as the US pulls back.
Harris, on the other hand, would likely embrace a “values-based” approach, with more aid but tied to human-rights conditions aligned with US standards. While ostensibly noble, this method imposes American cultural and political values on African countries, dictating terms under the guise of ‘help.’ This approach reduces African leaders’ roles to that of a ‘compliant partner,’ forced to implement social and economic policies that may not align with their constituents’ needs, or their values.
For Africa to truly chart its own path, it must seek to redefine foreign-aid partnerships, avoiding the traps of dependency and political conditionality that undermine sovereignty. Pan-African organizations and institutions should take the lead in setting Africa’s social and economic agenda, allowing the continent to build its own future without interference masked as ‘support.’
Toward a self-reliant and decolonized future
African nations must realize that neither Trump nor Harris offers a path toward true autonomy. Trump’s America sees Africa as an afterthought in his isolationist worldview, a continent to be ignored or exploited when convenient. Meanwhile, Harris’ diplomatic overtures, though seemingly cooperative, aim to keep Africa under the sway of American interests. Both paths lead to the same destination: the continued subjugation of African economies and resources under US dominance.
A real solution lies within Africa itself. African leaders must strengthen regional cooperation through the African Union and accelerate agreement on the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which aims to unify African economies and reduce dependence on Western markets. This agreement has the potential to break down trade barriers within the continent, creating a robust internal market that shields Africa from external shocks caused by Western protectionism and isolationist policies. By investing in home-grown infrastructural, agricultural, and industrial projects, Africa can gradually reduce reliance on both US and European investment, while partnering with the BRICS countries to achieve self-sufficiency that challenges neo-colonialist influence.
The choice Africa must make
For Africa, the US election is not a choice between Trump or Harris; it’s a choice between dependency and self-determination. African nations cannot afford to sit back and wait for Western policies to determine their fate. Instead, they must actively pursue alliances within the Global South, build economic resilience, and push back against the insidious tactics of neo-colonialism. US leaders may come and go, but Africa’s liberation will only come from within.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
