British actor Steven Fry has sparked a fierce debate, asking the International Olympic Committee to move the upcoming Winter Games from Sochi to Vancouver. He even compared Russia’s treatment of homosexuals to Nazi Germany. Was he right?
The subject of Fry’s ire is a controversial law passed in
June, which forbids the “promotion of non-traditional relations
among minors.” The terms “non-traditional” and “promotion” are
open to wide interpretation, with many gay activists in Russia
calling the law a potential blanket ban on any manifestations.
They also say that police have idly stood by as attacks on
homosexuals multiplied on the back of the new legislation.
While the first Olympic boycott dates back to 1936, when over 20
countries withdrew in protest against Nazism, the phenomenon
reached its peak in the 1970s and 80s – when four Olympic Games
in a row had absentees. The 1980 Moscow Games and the 1984 Los
Angeles Games saw rival Socialist and Western blocks withdraw
en-masse.
In recent weeks, the International Olympic Committee has
negotiated with Russia’s Olympic organizers, saying that it
received “assurances” that the law would be suspended for
the duration of the Games. Russian officials have produced
conflicting statements in response, and the situation remains
uncertain.
RT asked the opinion of several leading experts from across the
political spectrum whether the tradition of political protests at
sporting events should be revived in 2014.
Ben Harris Quinney, Chairman of conservative UK think tank
The Bow Group:
“When you approach international sporting events, you either
do this in the acknowledgement that other countries have a
different approach, or you don’t take part at all. Great Britain
took part in 2008 in Beijing, and many question the human rights
record there. And we will take part in the upcoming football
World Cup in Qatar, and it is fair to say that Qataris have a
very different view of what is appropriate in society.”
Nikolay Alekseev, prominent LGBT activist and lawyer:
“I am not for a boycott of the Olympic Games just because of
one reason. It is not possible to technically realize this
boycott – the Games cannot be moved. The only people who will
suffer this boycott are the sportspeople.”
“We think that the best solution for all this is to go and
protest during the Olympic Games, so that all the sportsmen can
join in and wear rainbow pins and talk about the issues during
the press conferences - so that the media reports about what is
going on in Russia.”
Dmitry Babich, political analyst for Voice of Russia
radio:
“I think fighting for gay rights is important. But I don’t
think that fighting for gay rights is the same as a political
campaign. The law has been in power for two months, and no one
even thought to connect it with the Olympics Games. The authors
did not have it in their mind when they wrote this law.”
Emmanuelle Moreau, head of media at the International
Olympic Committee:
“Boycotting Sochi 2014 would only serve to deprive the
country’s athletes from fulfilling their dreams of competing [in
the Olympics] - something they have dedicated a great portion of
their lives to accomplish. History has shown that boycotts do not
solve anything, but simply punish Olympic athletes.”
A petition promoted by Fry and gay Star Trek actor George Takei
is calling to move the Games to Vancouver – the city which hosted
them in 2010. The petition attracted 75,000 signatures in just a
few hours.
What will happen next in the debate over the Sochi Olympic Games?
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.