Labour warned of impending ‘electoral disaster’ after Sleaford by-election slump
A Tory by-election win that saw Labour’s share of the vote slashed has raised concern about the future of the party, with a senior Labour MP labeling the result an “electoral disaster.”
Conservative candidate Caroline Johnson easily retained the seat of Sleaford and North Hykeham in Lincolnshire with a 13,144 majority. The by-election was triggered after Tory MP Stephen Phillips resigned over “irreconcilable policy differences” with the government.
Sleaford & North Hykeham result:
— Britain Elects (@britainelects) December 9, 2016
CON: 53.5% (-2.7)
UKIP: 13.5% (-2.2)
LDEM: 11.0% (+5.3)
LAB: 10.2% (-7.0)
LIND: 8.8% (+3.6)
UKIP emerged as the runner-up to Johnson, with Victoria Ayling securing 4,426 votes.
Labour fell from second place at the 2015 General Election to fourth with only 3,363 votes.
The Liberal Democrats, which pulled in 3,606 votes, were up 5.33 percent.
WELL DONE VICTORIA AYLING. Labour crashed down into forth place. UKIP now speak for the working class. #sleafordandnorthhykeham#Sleafordhttps://t.co/itAZMYD1me
— David Hadley (@DavidHadley1973) December 9, 2016
Labour suffered the most in the by-election, with its vote share dropping 7.1 percent compared to the General Election.
But the Conservatives and UKIP also saw their vote share decrease, by 2.7 and 2.2 points respectively.
The Lib Dems had the best performance compared to 2015, almost doubling their vote share to 11 percent.
The Conservatives had been widely expected to keep the long-held seat, but Labour’s sharp drop is likely to cause alarm in the party.
Labour's PR team right now #sleafordpic.twitter.com/8r0PnEZKaN
— James Barwise (@jwbarwise1) December 9, 2016
Speaking to the Press Association, senior Labour MP David Winnick pointed the finger of blame at the party’s leadership for the “appalling” showing in the Lincolnshire seat.
“Even if one takes into account that the by-election turnout was considerably lower than in the general election, it was an appalling result for Labour,” the Walsall North MP said.
“If we were to continue in this way then the indications are 2020 will be an electoral disaster and the possibility of a Labour government very remote indeed.
“The sort of bunker mentality that seems to exist at the moment at the highest levels of the party needs to recognize what is happening in the outside world.”
Labour MP Jess Phillips said Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s “London-centric” pro-immigration views made it difficult for him to communicate with voters outside the capital.
She told the BBC the “result shows there isn’t a real clarity at the moment around Labour’s position on Brexit.”
Others are suggesting the results demonstrate Labour has nothing to offer either side of the Brexit divide.
Labour says Sleaford by election - in which it fell to fourth - proved difficult due to voters focus on Brexit. Pesky voters.
— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) December 9, 2016
#ukip#Sleaford Labour very weak in Sleaford and North Hykeham, two horse race between UKIP and Tory with no genuine conviction on Brexit
— Victoria Ayling (@VAylingukip1) November 29, 2016
Labour on Sleaford: "Sadly, voters insisted on making it about the defining political issue of our time and we don't have a policy on that."
— Jonathan Coe (@jonathancoe) December 9, 2016
The Sleaford result shows why Labour should be worried about the Brexit betrayal https://t.co/coN0VkyoQk via @FTpic.twitter.com/OObJtHiHa9
— Sebastian Payne (@SebastianEPayne) December 9, 2016
Former Chancellor George Osborne tweeted that Labour’s performance “was not good for democracy.”
The disintegration of the Labour Party is not good for democracy. Oppositions are meant to try to win by-elections, not slip from 2nd to 4th
— George Osborne (@George_Osborne) December 9, 2016