Drills or no drills? Confusion over VP Pence’s Korea comments after Trump promises halt to war games
Confusion reigns on Capitol Hill after one senator claimed US Vice President Mike Pence said military exercises in South Korea will continue, contrary to statements made by President Donald Trump in Singapore.
After meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on Monday, Trump announced the US will be “stopping the war games” on the Korean peninsula, describing them as expensive and “provocative.”
At a lunch with Republican senators on Tuesday, however, Pence said that exercises will continue - according to Senator Cory Gardner (R-Colorado), a frequent critic of Trump.
Pence told Senate GOP that military exercises in Korea will continue, per Sen. Gardner
— Burgess Everett (@burgessev) June 12, 2018
Politico reporter Burgess Everett cited Gardner’s claim, prompting Pence’s spokeswoman Alyssa Farah to outright deny it:
“VP didn’t say this at the Senate lunch today,” Farah tweeted.
.@VP didn’t say this at the Senate lunch today https://t.co/WxsEFy5c9J
— Alyssa Farah (@VPPressSec) June 12, 2018
Gardner then chimed in himself, appearing to back Everett’s version of events:
.@VP was very clear: regular readiness training and training exchanges will continue. https://t.co/9tnKhqxnMz
— Cory Gardner (@SenCoryGardner) June 12, 2018
At this point, an unnamed official from Pence’s office stepped in and told NBC that the VP was referring to the “bi-annual military exercises” and not the “routine training and readiness exercises,” meaning Gardner was technically correct but Everett had misunderstood him. There is a “huge difference between the two,” the anonymous official said.
Some 30 minutes after his original tweet, Gardner sent a follow-up, clarifying that Pence was saying “readiness training and exchanges” will continue, but “war games will not.”
.@VP went on to say while this readiness training and exchanges will occur, war games will not 2/2 https://t.co/cc6jwRw8zG
— Cory Gardner (@SenCoryGardner) June 12, 2018
An earlier clarification could have saved the Politico reporter a lot of trouble, but it wouldn’t have been breathlessly reported as breaking news, with Gardner at the center of it.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!