Capitalize on 'Russian meddling' like a pro: Fake it in state elections, write report for Senate

These days in the US one can pen a report about Russian meddling for the US Senate, stage fake Russian meddling in Alabama election and then have fellow fighters explain to curious journalists that it’s a typical Russian tactic.

It was a busy time for New Knowledge, a firm that claims its AI-driven software can identify signs of manipulation on social media and promptly defend its target by complaining to Facebook, Twitter or whatever. The tool helped expose the nefarious activities of Russia, like telling masturbation addicts that Jesus will help them ‘beat it together’ or promoting LGBT-friendly dildos on Instagram. Just read the report prepared by the firm for the US Senate Intelligence Committee – it’s bone-chilling.

The firm was also exposed by the New York Times as the bright minds behind an ‘experiment’ in the 2017 election in Alabama. New Knowledge used what they learned from the Ruskies to undermine the Republican candidate through fake online personas. They even faked Russian support of Roy Moore – an operation that was duly reported as Russia’s latest attack on American democracy by the Western media at the time. The exposure cost Jonathon Morgan, a co-founder of the firm, his Facebook account.

Dan Cohen dug deeper into the people behind the controversial firm, and they appear to be your typical Russiagate-riding opportunists. He published his finds at Grayzone Project, an independent left-wing publication. Cohen also works for RT America.

Morgan, for example, is one of the developers of the Hamilton 68 dashboard, the tool that purports to gaze into ongoing Russian social media operations by monitoring Twitter accounts, the list of which is too secret to be disclosed.

One wouldn’t normally consider an oracle spewing uncorroborated accusations as a valid source, but when it comes to Russia, it’s fine. So when Mother Jones wanted insight into how the Kremlin is propping up Moore, the newspaper turned to no other than Hamilton 68. The Russians use hashtag #alabamasenaterace to do so, the oracle responded.

Morgan previously worked for DARPA, the US military’s advanced research agency. His partner, Ryan Fox, is a 15-year veteran of the National Security Agency who also worked as a computer analyst for the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), Pentagon’s black ops unit.

Two guys so tight with the military presumably know a lot about ways to weaponize things, like anti-Russian sentiment in the US establishment. Scaring firms with potential bot attacks on their reputation into buying protection is apparently a viable business plan – the firm raised $11 million in venture capital this year.

Also embroiled in the scandal was Reid Hoffman, the billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, who donated millions to Democrats in the 2016 US election.

In a statement on Wednesday, Hoffman declared that “there is absolutely no place in our democracy for manipulating facts or using falsehoods to gain political advantage.”

Hoffman claimed to have had “no knowledge” that some $100,000 of his money ended up in the hands of New Knowledge to fund the Alabama campaign.

“I would not have knowingly funded a project planning to use such tactics, and would have refused to invest in any organization that I knew might conduct such a project,” he added.

The slight bump with the Alabama campaign is hardly a career killer for the valiant Russia-meddling fighters. Morgan simply distanced himself from the Times story and the newspaper that exposed the operation doesn’t seem to be interested in challenging him. Just a small case of friendly fire, nothing to worry about.

If you like this story, share it with a friend!