Kristol a Kremlin agent? Shady outfit claims term ‘neocon’ is Russian propaganda
Anyone using the term ‘neocon’ is doing the Kremlin’s bidding, according to PropOrNot, a shadowy outfit that sees Russian agents everywhere, in its quest to police social media on behalf of the ruling US establishment.
The anonymous and self-appointed guardians of democracy declared this week that terms such as “neocon,” “corporatist”, “imperialist” or “establishment” – among others – are “tropes/slurs primarily used by Russian propaganda.” To illustrate this, they tweeted a chart by someone called “Northern Conspirator,” another anonymous Twitter thought-police account.
THREAD: As you’re reading this, please note that the following are tropes/slurs primarily used by Russian propaganda:“Neocon”, “neoliberal”, “Zionist”, “corporatist”, “warmonger”, “Rothschild”, “imperialist”, & “establishment”. https://t.co/r0tgWBIZ37
— PropOrNot ID Service 🇺🇸 (@propornot) January 8, 2019
Reactions to PropOrNot’s claim have been swift and satirical, with outspoken critics of the corporatist imperial warmongering neocon-neoliberal establishment declaring themselves totally convinced.
Just learned from PropOrNot—an outfit set up by anonymous neocon State Department officials to smear antiwar journalists—the term “neocon” was invented by the Russian government for propaganda purposes.I repeat: “neocon” is Russian propaganda. There is no such thing in reality.
— Yasha Levine (@yashalevine) January 9, 2019
A pro war propaganda operation is insisting that language that suggests opposition to war and capitalism is Russian propaganda. Well I’m convinced. From now on I’ll be supportive of war and corporations. Otherwise the Russians win. https://t.co/KOknNY0FcG
— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) January 9, 2019
“PropOrNot ID Service,” as its full name goes, first made headlines in late 2016, as one of the outfits cited by the Washington Post claiming Russian meddling in US politics. The Post described them as “an independent team of concerned American citizens.”
Hiding behind anonymity, the outfit compiled a list of websites and people it declared “Russian” agents. After protests from multiple people who found themselves on the blacklist, the Post had to publish an editor’s note, saying it could not “vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media outlet.”
Also on rt.com Washington Post admits article on ‘Russian propaganda’ & ‘fake news’ based on sham researchIts influence continued, however, with multiple outlets on its blacklist finding themselves banned by Facebook in October 2018 as “Russian propaganda.”
The efforts of anonymous outfits to police speech in the US is problematic, given the recent revelations that another self-appointed guardian of democracy, New Knowledge, actually spearheaded a “false flag” social media operation in 2017 – one of the four such operations identified so far, all on behalf of Democrats in a hotly contested Senate race in Alabama. New Knowledge was later commissioned by the Senate Intelligence Committee to write a report on social media meddling, in which they attributed their own methods and tactics to the Russian government.
Also on rt.com The only ‘Russian bots’ to meddle in US elections belonged to Democrat-linked ‘experts’In addition to its malice in declaring all criticism of US establishment “Russian propaganda,” PropOrNot is factually wrong: neoconservatism is very much an American thing, as argued by its “godfather” Irving Kristol.
The “historical task and political purpose of neoconservatism would seem to be this: to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy,” Kristol wrote in an essay titled The Neoconservative Persuasion, published in 2003 by the Weekly Standard. That was also the title of Kristol’s collected writings, which came out after his death in 2009.
Kristol’s son Bill now sits on the advisory council of 'Alliance for Securing Democracy,' the parent organization of the Hamilton68 dashboard, a brainchild of New Knowledge’s co-founder Jonathon Morgan that purports to track “Russian bots” on Twitter.
The burning question now in everyone’s mind is how such luminaries of neoconservatism – from Irving and Bill Kristol to Norman and John Podhoretz – have managed to be undetected Kremlin agents for so long.
Irving Kristol was a Russian bot sent from the future. https://t.co/2ffZ46mrME
— Paul Blumenthal (@PaulBlu) January 9, 2019
And also Bill Kristol's dad, I think Irving Kristol wrote a book named "Neconservatism, Biography of an Idea". So Kristol pere was also a Russian agent, LOL.
— Ajit Hegde (@ajitrkhegde) January 9, 2019
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!