No Thanksgiving crackdown? 2 California sheriffs say deputies will NOT enforce Gov. Newsom’s new coronavirus restrictions
Two California sheriff’s departments have signaled that they will not enforce a new stay-at-home order issued by Governor Gavin Newsom, saying police resources are needed for emergencies and criminal matters.
The Orange County and Sacramento sheriff’s offices issued separate statements on Thursday night saying they would not respond to calls related to compliance with the new health mandate imposed by Newsom earlier in the day.
“The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office will not be determining – including entering any home or business – compliance with, or enforcing compliance of, any health or emergency orders related to curfews, staying at home, Thanksgiving or other social gatherings inside or outside the home, maximum occupancy, or mask mandates,” Sacramento Sheriff Scott Jones said in a lengthy Facebook post.
Those calling to report violations of the order would be referred to a non-emergency line and “routed” to the county health department, Jones went on, but added that “Of course, if there is potential criminal behavior or the potential for impacts to public or personal safety we will continue to respond appropriately.”
Also on rt.com Gov. Newsom imposes month-long curfew for most part of California amid criticism of flouting Covid-19 rules himselfHours later, the sheriff for Orange County, some 400 miles south of the state capital, issued a similar disclaimer noting that deputies would simply refuse to enforce the mandate, which sets a 10pm to 5am curfew for “non-essential work and gatherings” and comes into effect on Saturday at 10pm.
“At this time, due to the need to have deputies available for emergency calls for service, deputies will not be responding to requests for face-coverings or social gatherings-only enforcement,” said Sheriff Don Barnes, adding that the department is still “assessing the action by the governor.”
Statement from @OCSheriffBarnes on the limited Stay at Home Order issued by Governor Newsom. pic.twitter.com/qDnYS4fk6U
— OC Sheriff, CA (@OCSheriff) November 20, 2020
The statements immediately stoked controversy and debate online, with those skeptical of mask mandates and lockdown orders hailing the sheriffs for standing up to “Newsom’s dictatorship” and “tyranny.”
This is awesome. We are reaching a point where law enforcement agencies need to decide whether they will enforce tyranny or defend freedom. https://t.co/wnWII2ON7p
— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) November 20, 2020
Good.There’re real crimes happening in our state. Good to know you are prioritizing common sense over Newsom’s dictatorship.
— JC Mounduix (@JCMounduix) November 20, 2020
This is why @sacsheriff Scott Jones get my vote every time. Let Americans be free. If you’re sick stay home but we should not allow government to tell us we can or cannot see family or friends EVER
— John Luna (@sf9er4lyfe) November 19, 2020
Newsom has come under fire in recent days after photos surfaced showing him at a crowded dinner party held partially indoors, where some attendees went mask-less – all in violation of his own restrictions. While he argued the gathering followed “health protocols and safety precautions,” he nonetheless apologized, saying he “should have modeled better behavior” after repeatedly warning Californians about following the rules.
Other backers of the sheriffs weighed in to reinforce their case for placing emergency response over enforcing a “lack of common sense and personal responsibility,” referring to residents who flout the new restrictions.
Imagine responding to a public gathering or a person not wearing a mask while a burglary or priority calls are happening. There's other priorities than responding a no masker
— J.O (@jordanXCountry) November 20, 2020
I’d rather deputies be ready for emergency response than having to enforce lack of common sense and personal responsibility.
— Mama (@jacquie_rudy) November 20, 2020
Critics also emerged to oppose the move, calling it “disappointing” and insisting that lockdown violators “need to face consequences” amid the pandemic, some even calling for Barnes’ removal from office.
“So, the OC sheriff believes he can pick and choose which laws to order his personnel to ignore. He’s refusing to uphold his oath of office and should be removed,” one commenter said.
which of your numbers should we call to report a dumbass sheriff
— no. (@curmudgley) November 20, 2020
This is disappointing... People are dying. Education made sense months ago, but those still acting recklessly are beyond the reach of education. They need to face consequences. We may never be rid of this pandemic if we don't address these people appropriately.
— Bill K (@Billk92672) November 20, 2020
Newsom’s “limited” stay-at-home order comes as California approaches 1.1 million coronavirus infections and over 18,500 deaths, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. The state comes second in the US for overall cases, trailing only Texas, as the nationwide total exceeds 11.7 million infections and 252,000 fatalities.
Also on rt.com ‘Different sets of rules’: California Medical Association reps & maskless guests were at Newsom dinner that BROKE Covid-19 adviceThink your friends would be interested? Share this story!