icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
26 Nov, 2014 05:40

RT America -- November 26, 2014

Ferguson, Mo. erupted into chaos on Monday night following the grand jury announcement that it will not be indicting police officer Darren Wilson. Fires were set, looting occurred and shots were fired in a violent reaction that eclipsed even the worst night from the unrest in August. RT’s Manuel Rapalo is on the ground in Ferguson with more.

Legal experts are questioning why the grand jury that decided to not indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson took a number of unusual steps. From hearing first-hand testimony from Wilson himself to using potentially leading terminology to perhaps downplay the significance of the officer’s actions, many things make the proceedings different from most. Attorney Patrice Sulton speaks to RT’s Ben Swann to provide insight.

Podcasts
0:00
27:38
0:00
29:4