Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Strategic failure: Iceland allowed 2008 bank collapses to support households

Published time: January 30, 2014 11:14
Edited time: January 30, 2014 12:16
A general view shows the city of Reykjavik seen from Hallgrimskirkja church (Reuters/Stoyan Nenov)

A general view shows the city of Reykjavik seen from Hallgrimskirkja church (Reuters/Stoyan Nenov)

Iceland is the land of active volcanoes and unexpected decisions. During the crisis in 2008 the government let its banks collapse instead of bailing them out, as they proved too big to save. The next challenge is to bring unemployment rate to 2 percent.

Iceland, whose stock market after the 2008 financial crisis plunged 90 percent while unemployment rose ninefold, has chosen a risky crisis-management policy as a way-out. After shrinking by over 10 percent during 2009-2010, Iceland's GDP began to recover.

During the worst financial crisis in six decades, successive Icelandic governments forced banks to write off mortgage debts to help households, and while the euro area struggles with record unemployment rate (with over 25 percent in Greece and Spain), Iceland has a reason to celebrate, with joblessness in December as low as 4.5 percent, according to Statistics Iceland. The number of persons in the labor force in the fourth quarter last year was 184,600, which corresponds to an activity rate of 80.7 percent.

The prime minister recently announced that the next big challenge for the small island nation with the population of 325,620 is to see unemployment going to under 2 percent, because, as Sigmundur D. Gunnlaugsson told Bloomberg in January, "Icelanders aren’t accustomed to unemployment.”

At 85 percent, Iceland's labor-market is the highest in Europe and one of the highest in the world. In December alone, 172 new private limited companies were registered in the island, compared with 147 in December 2012. The largest number of new registrations was in financial and insurance activities. In 2013, 1,938 new private limited companies were registered, which is a 10.6 percent increase compared with 2012.

On January 24, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised the outlook on Iceland to stable from negative. S&P estimated that Iceland's proposed mortgage debt relief program will have a cumulative fiscal cost of about 6 percent of GDP over the next four years. It is expected that the government will finance the program through increased taxation and not higher deficits. High external debt burdens remain key ratings constraints, however.

"Although Iceland's economy was able to adjust after the crisis through currency depreciation and private sector defaults, a nonresident holding of ISK-denominated assets presented a large overhang to the currency markets. The Central Bank of Iceland addressed this through foreign exchange controls implemented in 2008. Its plans to lift the controls have been hampered by the country's shallow domestic capital markets and the significant risks of capital flight," S&P said in a statement, adding that the need for continued foreign exchange controls is a credit weakness for the sovereign ratings on Iceland.

Iceland’s inflation has mostly come via the exchange rate protected by capital controls. Over the past 12 months, the krona has appreciated about 10 percent against the euro.

"Although we’re spending more on welfare matters today than before, we have to keep in mind that purchasing power has gone down since 2008," a sociology professor at the University of Iceland, Stefan Olafsson, told Bloomberg.

Despite overwhelming criticism from international financial institutions, Iceland’s government (formed after the April 2013 election) announced in November that it will be writing off up to 24,000 euro ($32,600) of every household’s mortgage, fulfilling its election promise. The government said the debt relief will be spread out over four years and will begin by mid-2014; and the prime minister has promised that public finances will not be put at risk.

According to estimates, the measure is set to cost $1.2 billion in total, reduced by 13 percent on average. The design of the measures could result in foreign creditors of the defaulted Icelandic banks bearing around three quarters of the cost of the household debt forgiveness, however. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said Iceland has "little fiscal space for additional household debt relief," while the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) stated that the island should limit its mortgage relief to low-income households.

Iceland's financial sector has been restructured since the bank defaults of 2008. In what became the biggest penalty for a financial scandal in Iceland's history, four former bosses from the failed Kaupthing Bank were sentenced to between three and five years in prison in December, and must pay millions of pounds in legal costs. They were convicted of fraud ahead of the collapse of the country's biggest bank in October 2008. The bankers were accused of concealing an investor from Qatar, which bought a 5.1 percent equity stake in Kaupthing, with the money illegally provided as a loan from the bank itself.

In 2008, Kaupthing and other Icelandic banks, such as Landsbanki and Glitnir, were on the brink of collapse and had borrowed funds on the money markets to provide credit to customers. The amount borrowed was more than six times Iceland's gross domestic product. Kaupthing collapsed in 2008 under the weight of huge debts.

Comments (8)

 

Suq Maddiq 31.01.2014 04:49

And the US bailed out its bankers and let the people get their homes and jobs stolen from them.

What happened to the American people? They are like drooling zombies.

 

Karel Cleuren 30.01.2014 16:18

In one scenario they look at an isolated country doing everything they can in order to help out the people. In the other they let the people take the blame and do all the paying.

The Icelandic experiment was to expensive. The Greece scenario caused riots.

They couldn't do the Greek scenario on the mainland or Entire Europe would have wanted to follow suit.

So now they are going for the so called golden road. Saving the banks, cutting costs for the low-income. The highincome or middle class do the paying.

Whi le the rich run with there money.

It's just the EU looking after itself not the people.

 

Dar R 30.01.2014 15:11

Iceland’s government will be written in the history books as a ship of integrity that was sailing in a sea of corruption.

View all comments (8)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us