JP Morgan and Citigroup reconsider executive bonuses

Get short URL

Published time: September 10, 2012 11:50
Edited time: September 10, 2012 15:50

Trends

Eurozone crisis

Tags

Corporate news, Crisis, Employment, Finance, Investment

JP Morgan Chase & Co may pay smaller bonuses for its top management while Citigroup is also rethinking executive pay structure in a bid to please investors after several tactical blunders this year.

JP Morgan, the biggest US bank, has lost at least $5.8 billion in failed derivative trades. It may cut 2012 bonuses including for its CEO James Dimon, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people close to the institution.

Dimon is expected to compensate for trading losses that amounted to $5.8 billion through the end of the second quarter, but it isn't yet clear how this will be done. The board will consider a variety of factors when setting compensation, including the bank's performance and how Dimon handled the losses after they surfaced, a person close to the process told WSJ.

JP Morgan Chase already has initiated pay cuts for four former executives involved in the trading losses. One option for Mr. Dimon is that the cash portion of his bonus could drop, these people said. Last year, James Dimon received a cash bonus of $4.5 million and a stock bonus of $17 million, plus $1.5 million in base salary.

The board of another banking giant Citigroup is pondering how to revise next-year's compensation plan to gain approval of investors who are also concerned with the $14.9 million that Vikram Pandit, Citigroup's chief executive, was paid last year. In April, shareholders rejected the management's pay structure in a non-binding vote. Pandit was paid only $1 in annual salary and no bonus in 2010, following his voluntary refusal to accept a bonus until the bank returned to profitability. Citigroup is likely to tailor next year's plan to include more quantitative measures, WSJ quoted people familiar with the situation.

A number of major US banks are struggling to come up with executive pay amid volatile financial industry performance, weak economic growth and widespread cost-cutting.

Comments (4)

Willie Champion 27.02.2013 11:16

It's difficult even imagining any individual being worth a salary greater than $300, 000.00 annually. What it amounts to is nothing other than a means for corporations to whittle down their earnings by "dumping cash and options onto executives." Of course those in government will say their high salaries are a means of attracting the best and brightest when in reality all it additionally does is provide incentives for criminal activity through schemes that are possible because those responsible, in Congress, are not as clever as the criminal minds hired by corporations.

Undo

Peter Jennings (unregistered) 11.09.2012 17:23

They have to, their broke!
These shysters think we are all daft. They think we can't add and subtract.

The se guys should lose all they have just to see what it feels like. They can watch their kids struggle day after day and finally fail under the mountains of debt and then get crushed by a uncaring system that only sees the merit of money. See if they like being pushed around by big business because they know you haven't the money to fight them.

Then they will get a taste of what they have inflicted on others who trusted them with their hard earned cash and the future wellbeing of their families.

Undo

Green (unregistered) 10.09.2012 19:58

why teachers or doctors or engineers do not get hefty bonuses which can buy them a house? what are bankers doing so that they are so generously rewarded? just doing their job??

Undo

View all comments (4)