Breaking news

At least 50 injured after car crashes into crowd at Virginia parade

Germany’s RWE to give up Nabucco project

Published time: December 03, 2012 10:44
Edited time: December 04, 2012 15:22
(L-R) European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, prime ministers Gordon Bajnai of Hungary, Werner Faymann of Austria, Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, Sergei Stanishev of Bulgaria and Emil Boc of Romania attend the Nabucco Gas Pipeline signing ceremony in Ankara, on July 13, 2009. (AFP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici)

German second largest energy company RWE is going to leave the Nabucco gas pipeline project and is reportedly discussing the sale of its 16.1% stake to Austria’s OMV.

­OMV, the Austrian oil and gas company which owns another 16% in the Nabucco project, could conclude the purchase from RWE as early as this week, Focus magazine reported citing people familiar with the project.

The other shareholders of Nabucco are Hungary's MOL, Turkey's Botas, Bulgaria's BEH and Romania's Transgazm, each holding about 16% of shares, with RWE's stake the largest.

In May RWE said it was reviewing strategic requirements regarding its participation in Nabucco, sparkling rumors it would leave the project.

The Nabucco pipeline project is aimed at delivering Caspian gas to the European Union to rival Russia’s South Stream. According to the original plan, the 3,900 km pipeline was to cross Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania to end in Austria and was designed to supply up to 31bn cubic metres per year. The start of construction was scheduled for 2013. 

“RWE is one of the biggest gas consumers in Europe. If it decides to leave the project it would definitely put it at risk. It can be delayed for few more years. But the more they delay, the less gas Europe needs. By the time they decide to do something the South stream may well be at their boarder. Europe just don’t need that much gas”, Ildar Davletshin, Oil and gas analyst from Renaissance capital.

But several months ago the project was put in doubt as it became clear there were no guarantees there would be enough gas. Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban said the country's utility MOL was leaving Nabucco due to the financial constraints of the project.

Recently the Nabucco consortium submitted plans for a smaller Nabucco West pipeline which would deliver gas from Azerbaijan’s Shah Deniz 2 field.

Meanwhile Russian major gas producer Gazprom and its partners in the South Stream gas pipeline, including Eni, EdF and BASF have signed off on the final investment to begin the 16 billion euro project. The construction is due to start on December 7.

Comments (5)

Baboushka & Co 06.12.2012 15:31

nabucco bambucco Greetz for Tomasz and other Rusophobes ;-)

+1

Undo

Danaos (unregistered) 03.12.2012 19:48

Duncan-Lucas is right in saying this is MAJOR NEWS.

The ship is shinking and the rats are jumping out. The ship is the American-backed pipeline project called Nabucco aimed at diverting central Asian gas sources away from Russian influence and bringing them into Europe via Turkmenistan (via Kaspian Sea, above Iran), Azerbaitzan, Georgia and Turkey, i.e. an amazing array of instable countries run often (like in the case of Turkey) but fascist-like regimes or by dictatorial relics like Turkmenistan or Azerbaitzan or half-failed states like Georgia that has lost the 1/3rd of its own sovereignty thanks to their clinging to American policies. Amazing! All that to avoid simply buying cheap natural gas from 1 country, 1 provider, 1 seller, Russia. Pathetic.

 I had predicted this outcome years ago. In fact, more than a decade, back at a time people thought Nabucco as inevitable and the north/south/streams as a wannabe competitors. Well here we are.
Mind you. The case of Syria and the Middle East is not just about the oil and gas and the pipelines. People, most people, even specialists, tend to forget the most basic: the trade-routes. Common, mundane, commercial products trade-routes. Your cheap, cheapest chinese plastic - how do you think reaches you in Europe and US east-coast if not via Suez? And do you think this is the only route it could take? Certainly not but it does - thus Suez moves around the 70% of world intercontinental trade. If M.E. oil brings say 100 dollars, the 70% of WIT brings 7,000 dollars in comparison. The fight is for this. Oil is just one of the parameters.

+2

Undo

Crusader148 03.12.2012 15:08

Russia has proven itself reliable trade partner unlike many mid-Eastern and Caucasus anarchist states, hence this logical decision by Germany...

+4

Undo

View all comments (5)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us