Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Bahraini prince accused of torture may lose immunity in UK

Published time: May 13, 2014 19:07
Edited time: May 15, 2014 12:17
ARCHIVE PHOTO: Anti-government protesters confront riot police assembled on a flyover near the Pearl Square in Manama, March 13, 2011 (Reuters / Hamad I Mohammed)

ARCHIVE PHOTO: Anti-government protesters confront riot police assembled on a flyover near the Pearl Square in Manama, March 13, 2011 (Reuters / Hamad I Mohammed)

A Bahraini royal family member might be stripped of his diplomatic immunity in the UK after an opposition protester, who accuses him of involvement in torture, has been given permission to challenge his immunity from prosecution.

The judicial review proceedings were brought by a Bahraini citizen in Britain after Bahrain's pro-democracy uprising in 2011, which was violently crushed by the al-Khalifa regime.

In 2012, the UK's Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) gave Prince Nasser immunity, a decision now challenged as “erroneous in law.”

Earlier the CPS said that the prince, who is now 27 years old, did not enjoy immunity from his royal status as his household was separate from that of the king, but he still had functional immunity as commander of Bahrain's Royal Guard, a post he has held since 2011.

Up until last week, the Prince’s identity hadn’t been revealed, the English court having itself initially imposed a period of anonymity, which has now expired.

The claimant, who has been granted asylum in the UK, remains anonymous. He is known only as FF and claims he was badly beaten and given a prison sentence after participating in protests in the Gulf state.

The arrest and prosecution of the prince was sought by FF's lawyers, based on section 134 of the UK’s Criminal Justice Act of 1988, under which torture carried out by a public official is an offence.

When contacted by the Financial Times, the Bahrain embassy in London said that as the case questions legal grounds of an English prosecutorial decision, "Bahrain is not a party to the case and therefore it would be inappropriate for it to comment," adding that the underlying factual allegations are considered by Bahrain to be "both false and politically motivated.”

"Bahraini representatives did not originally seek to secure, nor have since sought to extend, any reporting restrictions over his identity.Bahrain is not a party to the litigation to be heard later this year at which the DPP will be required to explain to the Court the rationale behind asserting sovereign immunity, among the various reasons for declining to bring a prosecution in the UK," RT has also been told by a spokesperson for the Government of the Kingdom of Bahrain.

The 2011 protests in the island country of Bahrain were crushed by the government, but violence hasn't stopped in the kingdom. Protests led by the Shia-majority continue against the minority Sunni al-Khalifa monarchy.

In November 2012, Amnesty International criticized the US and UK for refusing to condemn human rights violations committed by Bahrain. The Gulf Arab state is an ally of both nations.

A report from the human rights watchdog accused Washington and London of criticizing the country’s monarchy without actually withdrawing support. It called on the US and Britain to “match their condemnation with action, instead of satisfying themselves with the narrative of reform while ignoring the reality of repression.”

Meanwhile, Prince Nasser's father, King Hamad bin Issa Al Khalifa, will be visiting the UK this week to take part in the Royal Windsor Horse Show. A London conference celebrating Bahrain is also planned, with The Duke of York Prince Andrew as the keynote speaker.

Comments (3)

 

active activist 14.05.2014 12:06

thats all well, good....what about the recent immunity given to Zionist Israeli's.....they too shud be charged at the ICC.......oops sorry....wrong world here...pro apartheid zionist western nations are in control of ICC
snuff said

 

John Brown 14.05.2014 10:47

They pick on one little person to scare the entire leadership of the Arab World, "see what we did with those that did not follow our instructions" Saddam Hussein, Muamer Qadaffi were executed for not being puppets. Bush, Blair, Cheney, Rumsfeld; and of course the Rothschild, Rockefeller families should all be brought to court for the havoc they create around the world with millions dying because of their dirty conspiracies, using their power with oil, banking and drugs money to torture kill and control us little peons. Putin is fighting these Rothschilds, bankers and oil companies, they want Putin to be their puppet

 

StumpedtheChump Again 13.05.2014 20:48

Yeah might as well start with all the UK politicians involved in destabilizing govts and killing innocent civilians.

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us