Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Rail fail: French company orders $20bn worth of trains too wide for platforms

Published time: May 21, 2014 13:20
Edited time: May 22, 2014 11:19
AFP Photo/Francois Guillot

AFP Photo/Francois Guillot

A massive blunder has led to the French national rail operator facing public humiliation and $100 million in losses, so far, after it mistakenly ordered $20 billion worth of new trains that were too wide for some platforms.

The 2,000 trains ordered by the train company SNCF of course cost much more than attempting to repair the platforms in a way that would fit the new trains; this is where the 80 million euro ($110 million) is now going towards, weekly satirical Le Canard Enchaine reported on Wednesday, followed by the rest of the French media.

The crux of the problem is simple: the company in charge of providing the specifications prior to the order (RFF – the network, owner of SNCF – the rail company) had given the SNCF dimensions only for platforms built less than 30 years ago. Most of the country’s platforms were built more than 50 years ago, with different dimensions. Now more than 1,000 of the 8,700 platforms will need to be refitted.

Construction work is now underway to widen the hundreds of platforms to accommodate new trains, according to Christophe Piednoel of RFF, who told France Info radio that “we discovered the problem a bit late” and that “we recognize that and we accept responsibility on that score.”

So far, 300 station platforms have been modified since work began in 2013, and the project is set to be complete in 2016.

"It can involve chipping a few centimeters off the edge of a platform, or moving an electricity power box located a bit too close to the platform edge," said RFF.

"It's a bit like buying a Ferrari that you want to fit into your garage, but then realizing your garage isn't quite Ferrari-sized, because up until now you didn't own a Ferrari," the company offered by way of a somewhat ill-fitting analogy.

RFF boss Jacques Rapoport responded along the same lines, promising the buck would not be passed on the consumer.

"These trains are new. Whenever we introduce new rolling stock, we need to change the infrastructure," he said.

But many French politicians from both sides of the aisle have nonetheless pounced on the blunder.

"With the price of train tickets steadily rising over the years, this waste of public money is absolutely insufferable," said Marine Le Pen, the head of the far-right National Front party. He further accused RFF of serving up a “gross underestimation” regarding costs for fixing the mistake.

Jean-Christophe Cambadelis, the head of France's ruling Socialist party, also weighed in with an air of incredulity.

"It's absolutely astounding. Frankly I don't understand," said Cambadelis, adding that bosses at the state-owned firm should step up and take responsibility.

France’s Transport Minister Frederic Cuvillier earlier offered his comment on the situation, blaming the country’s “absurd rail system,” in reference to several measures passed by the government in 1997. He believes having the RFF and SNCF as two separate entities is not practical.

“This is what happens”, he told local BFMTV.

This issue will soon be tackled, however, as the SNCF and RFF will reportedly merge under reform plans slated to be rolled out in June.

Although RFF is a true pro in the train game, offering some of the fastest rides in Europe, it hasn’t been able to avoid some bad publicity in recent times, after a trans-Atlantic deal with a Maryland company in US fell through because of alleged WWII links the French company had had with the Vichy regime. This fact cost the giant a cool $2.2 billion, according to France 24.

During the German occupation of France, SNCF deported more than 76,000 Jews to concentration camps, of whom only 3,000 survived. There are now ongoing negotiations, with the US State Department hoping to reach an arrangement on compensating the victims’ families as soon as possible.

The company and the government are at odds, however, as to who exactly should cover that, with the SNCF saying it was only a “cog in the Nazi extermination machine,” placing the burden of payment with the government.

Comments (23)

 

Chris S 23.05.2014 13:17

I wouldn't hand the blame to the train maker, it is the clowns that didn't address the fact there were old and new platforms at differing specs, that is the real problem, there should be one size, this is a regulatory blunder not the train makers fault.

 

Bill Marquis 22.05.2014 17:59

so just narrow the platforms. non story.

 

Predrag Raos 22.05.2014 16:31

Maybe coal mines which fueled the engines, as well as steel mills that provided the rails, should pay indemnities too. As for collaboration with Vichy, SNCF was obviously morally obliged to stop any transportation and let the population starve, all in the name of political correctness.

View all comments (23)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us