Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

CIA chief in Afghanistan 'accidentally' exposed by White House press staff

Published time: May 26, 2014 11:42
Edited time: May 28, 2014 08:41
The lobby of the CIA Headquarters Building in McLean, Virginia (Reuters/Larry Downing)

The lobby of the CIA Headquarters Building in McLean, Virginia (Reuters/Larry Downing)

The Obama Administration’s press service unwittingly put the real name of the CIA’s top spy in Afghanistan on the ‘pool report’ distributed among journalists accompanying the American president on a surprise trip to Kabul’s Bagram Airfield base.

The identity of the man dubbed ‘Chief of Station’, the usual address to a CIA local chief, was inadvertently added to a list of 15 US officials supposed to take part in a military briefing with Obama at the base, and emailed it to the White House press pool on Saturday, the Washington Post reported.

The unusual address was observed by Scott Wilson, the Washington Post's White House bureau chief, who informed the White House press officials.

“Wilson said that after the report was distributed, he noticed the unusual reference to the station chief and asked White House press officials in Afghanistan whether they had intended to include that name,” reported the Washington Post. “Initially, the press office raised no objection, apparently because military officials had provided the list to distribute to news organizations. But senior White House officials realized the mistake and scrambled to issue an updated list without the CIA officer's name.”

Up to 6,000 journalists, including some for foreign outlets, received the original version of the document, yet the identity of the CIA officer has not been disclosed. The list also contained such names as the US Ambassador to Afghanistan James B. Cunningham, the commander of US and ISAF forces in the country, Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, Jr. and other top brass.

There have been no comments either from the CIA or the White House on how the CIA officer will proceed with his duties in the Afghan capital from now on. Yet the White House press service informed inspective Washington Post’s employee that making the CIA’s officer name public might endanger his family.

As the Washington Post noted, with hundreds of subordinate officers and analysts under his command, the CIA Station Chief in Kabul is unlikely take part in clandestine missions and operates from the US Embassy compound anyway, whereas senior Afghan government officials are probably aware of his identity anyway.

In neighboring Pakistan, at least three CIA station chiefs have been exposed over recent years, and in at least one case an officer had to flee the country after receiving death threats.

The Washington Post points out that the latest incident of a kind took place back in 2003 during the George W. Bush presidency, when former CIA operative Valerie Plame was deliberately exposed as the US officials tried to apply pressure on her husband, an American diplomat criticizing the US invasion to Iraq.

President Barack Obama made a surprise visit to the US largest military installation in Afghanistan to mark Memorial Day with US troops ahead of planned withdrawal from the country, and to try and talk the outgoing Afghan President Hamid Karzai into signing a security deal. The latter aspiration proved to be in vain.

Comments (48)

 

ELISANsusie 28.05.2014 16:05

Why is she so surprised? It was done on purpose ...is part of the NWO- ORDER...she should know ...she worked with the CIA and they say once a CIA always a CIA. Do you know who runs the American CIA?

 

Jack Kelly 28.05.2014 12:24

Pooh Tin's news trying so hard to stir the pot. He will have to take pictures while riding an elephant shirtless to boost his popularity now.

 

Enki40 28.05.2014 11:22

This is no mistake. The controlling societies have controlled for centuries - this is merely an encrypted message for the CIA agent to be removed. They know they're losing so they throw more chaos into the media. They know they won't win, the people outnumber them. As long as we stay focussed and know 'what they're up to', they can't control us for long.

View all comments (48)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us