icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
17 Aug, 2014 17:31

'Don’t trust Wikipedia!' - Free Encyclopedia grilled on editorial flaws (VIDEO)

'Don’t trust Wikipedia!' - Free Encyclopedia grilled on editorial flaws (VIDEO)

As global conflicts lurch into the second half of 2014, the nature of their online documentation is of great importance, and the Wikimedia Foundation bears great responsibility. Satirist Nimrod Kamer put their staffers to the test in a report for RT.

Kamer reports for RT from Wikimania, the annual Wikipedia festival to probe the founders over locked pages, ‘article vandalism’, and the deficit of emojis on Wikipedia articles posing questions to the foundation’s chiefs and using examples from his own page edits to illustrate the fallibility of the online encyclopedia.

Now and then, entries get ‘locked’ because of excessive editing, and topics such as the Israel/Gaza conflict, MH370 and even the Ebola virus have fallen victim to such edits.

“Entries like this are locked temporarily from time to time when there's excessive vandalism or an argument has broken out that's become too emotional or too personal,”
Jimmy Wales, Co-founder of Wikipedia told RT.

Watch part 1 of Kamer's report:

They said that they can lock every page but there are different trolls for every controversial page, depending on the story.

Software Engineer Amir E. Aharoni put forward the necessity for neutrality and independent thought when using it for information. “This is not a newspaper, this is not a propaganda site, this is an encyclopedia; it’s supposed to be as neutral as possible.”

However, he cautioned against using it as a source. “Don’t trust Wikipedia!” he stated. “If you do see citations, check the citations…make your own decisions and make your own conclusions.”

Watch part 2 of Kamer's report:

Kamer reported his own basic edits that he has made – both typos and content edits– surprisingly to the delight of a senior designer. “I want to build a thing that will automatically insert typos into the system,” said Brandon Harris. “Just because editing a typo is the easiest and least controversial thing that new editors can do.”

Kamer himself is no stranger to Wikipedia vandalism: In 2012 he was locked in a battle with the Wikimedia foundation which mulled the deletion of his page after he pursued a handful of celebrities telling them he had changed their Wikipedia pages and offered to switch them back for a fee in a stunt he dubbed satirical.

He maintained his criticism of how people can be paid off by celebrities to make Wikipedia pages more favorable to their personas.

“To exemplify how easy it is to make money, I went to Kanye West and other celebrities and told them I changed the Wikipedia pages and asked for money to fix it.” Kamer said he “got some” and “it’s a viable way to make money – extortion.”

The festival conference ended on a lighthearted note – the absence of emojis on standard Wikipedia pages. Kamer appeared perplexed at their nonexistent usage across the website.

“I’m just not sure that there’s that much need for emojis. I would caution against the use of emojis because it would just descend into…people beginning to speak in emojis,” said one staffer.

“Just use your emojination!” quipped Kamer.


Filming and cut by Craig Murdoch

Podcasts
0:00
27:19
0:00
26:12