Secret bases, hi-tech spy planes as US expands Africa intel

Published time: June 14, 2012 08:29
Edited time: June 14, 2012 19:27
Undated file photo courtesy of the U.S. Navy shows a RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle conducting tests over Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland (Reuters/U.S. Navy/Erik Hildebrandt/Northrop Grumman/Handout)

The US is planning to expand secret intelligence bases throughout Africa with a view to combating terrorism in the region, says a new report by the Washington Post. It is the latest in a US push to militarize its presence on the continent.

The plans include the deployment of spy planes equipped with high-tech surveillance technology.

The US is set to extend its influence, opening a number of intelligence air bases “from the fringes of the Sahara to jungle terrain along the equator,” said the Washington Post.

The initiative dates back to 2007 and is indicative of the rapid expansion of US Special Forces operations in the region as part of the decade-long war against Al-Qaeda.

The US will use the strategically-placed bases to launch spy planes disguised as private aircraft kitted-out with a range of sensors able to record video, track infrared heat trails and tap into radio and mobile phone signals.

The reasoning behind the ratcheting-up of surveillance on the African continent by the US is the increasing presence of terrorist cells that could potentially destabilize the region.

The Washington Post said that the US government currently has a number of intelligence facilities across Africa, including Uganda, Ethiopia, Kenya, the Seychelles, Burkina Faso and Mauritania.

The bases in Burkina Faso and Mauritania are used to spy on Al-Qaeda.

The US military has expressed concerns over the growing influence of the Nigerian terrorist sect Boko Haram, blamed for a wave of bombings in the country in December and Al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Shabab in Somalia.

In addition, 100 special troops are currently in action in Uganda to hunt for Joseph Kony, the leader of a brutal guerrilla group known as the Lord’s Resistance Army.

Some state department officials have questioned the necessity to step-up a US presence in Africa given that many of the terrorist groups active on the continent represent no direct threat to the US.

In spite of doubts the US continues to rack up its presence in Africa. Last month the Army Times confirmed US military plans to deploy over 3,000 troops across the continent as part of a “regionally aligned force concept.”

­

US to maintain 'Light Footprint' in Africa?

Officially the US is painting an altogether different picture of its operations in Africa. Army General Carter F. Ham top US Africa command officer said that the US is not seeking permanent military bases in the region.

“In Africa, I would say a light footprint is consistent with what we need and consistent with the defense guidance,"
said General Carter.

The general said he recognized that some African nations were concerned over increased US military presence across Africa, but stressed that this did not necessarily mean the US would be establishing more bases there.

However, in a testimony to US Congress in March he said that he wanted to increase US surveillance and reconnaissance in Africa.

“Without operating locations on the continent, ISR [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] capabilities would be curtailed, potentially endangering US security,” he said.

Comments (51)

fuckUSterrorists (unregistered) 17.06.2012 04:16

What they mean is they dont want other terrorists getting a slice of their terrorist pie.

+12

Undo

teddyformusic (unregistered) 17.06.2012 02:29

Ted (unregistered) wrote in #15
@teddyfo rmusic 
Whilst your right in some aspects, China get's access to tax free resources in Africa. These African resources then get shipped to China, to then be sold back to Africa in the form of flip flops and umbrellas. You can build all the infrastructure you like in Africa, the British certainly did that, Zimbabwe for example - we then left them to themselves, Mugabe shows up and it's been misery ever since. 

==== ==================== ===========\

as for "notorious for corruption" -=- let us not mince words here -- or be SELECTIVE about it. 

the ENTIRE world -- especially weaker countries have borne the BRUNT of EVERY KIND OF CORRUPTION that was b rought upon THEM BY the western colonizers....
th e financial SCHEMES, the global "corporatism" "defined" by western "law making" -- the Militarism, the globe-spanning briberies MASQUERADING as "playing by the rules" -- exactly WHAT ARE THEY if not an ENTIRE western culture of Corruption? 
"no torious china" is NOTHING compared to THAT. 
how many decades have the CORRUPT western corporations , especially oil corporations gotten away with MURDERS of whistleblowers, protesters, natives in africa for their resources? THAT ought to be the prime example of "notorious corruption"....
a nd leaving behind THEIR WAKE nothing but Destruction, wars, starvations, poverty .....
"corruption by china" as notorious? as opposed to what from the west? 
CLEAN BUSINESS? 
let's not even go there. 

0

Undo

teddyformusic (unregistered) 17.06.2012 02:26

Ted (unregistered) wrote in #15
@teddyfo rmusic 
Whilst your right in some aspects, China get's access to tax free resources in Africa. These African resources then get shipped to China, to then be sold back to Africa in the form of flip flops and umbrellas. 

============

as an old Italian Gentleman -- 101 when I had some chats with him, with superb memory, clear eyes, great health, reading in several languages once told me: 

"I was a boy when the First world War came -- and a man when the second world war and fascism came to my country Italy...I always loved cultures and lands and peoples -- so I became a Nautical Engineer and traveled far and wide -- china, africa, everywhere....I know about Empires, I know about the Roman Empire because I AM Roman...today the closest to that is the USA and its allies......the TROUBLE with US --- Westerners is THIS: we crossed lands and oceans into the other cultures -- with our advancements not in order to HELP them or even just Trade with them  and be WILLING to pay the price for what they had -- 
instead we just ENRICHED OURSELVES completely at their expense leaving them with NOTHING...and THEN we judge them and are surprised and offended when they come to our shores after we impoverished their lands and their peoples". 

t he OPERATIVE WORD or PHRASE is "leaving them with NOTHING" ....

THAT is the difference betweeen the CULTURE of China that has traditionally been MORE about TRADE than "conquest" and "Extermination" as a matter of "divine right" as the westerners have made it. 

0

Undo

View all comments (51)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us