Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

‘Winter is coming’: Dutch tell UN court Russia breached international law, must free Greenpeace activists

Published time: November 06, 2013 17:47
reenpeace activists call to release Arctic Sunrise crew during their campaign at the Moscow River. (RIA Novosti/Maxim Blinov)

reenpeace activists call to release Arctic Sunrise crew during their campaign at the Moscow River. (RIA Novosti/Maxim Blinov)

The Netherlands has demanded that Russia free all 30 Arctic Sunrise activists detained in Murmansk at an international tribunal in Hamburg. Greenpeace protested Russia’s boycott of the hearings by sailing along the Moscow River in boats.

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on Wednesday held a hearing into the Arctic Sunrise icebreaker and its crew, who attempted to board a Russian oil platform in the Arctic in September. All 30 activists were arrested and are still detained, and the ship was towed to Murmansk by Russian authorities.

The case against Russia was in October brought to the tribunal by the Netherlands, under whose flag the Arctic Sunrise was sailing. A Dutch government representative, Liesbeth Lijnzaad, claimed Russia had “violated the human rights” of the activists trying to climb onto Russia’s first offshore Arctic oil rig in what they described as a peaceful protest.

The Netherlands demanded in court that all the activists be released.

According to the Dutch, Russian coast guards’ boarding of the Arctic Sunrise was “internationally wrongful,” breaching the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and customary international law. All subsequent acts – such as arrests and prolonged detention – were “wrongful” as well, they claimed.

Greenpeace said that the Arctic Sunrise did not breach the 500-meter safety zone of the drilling platform, and that it was arrested in international waters, where the vessels may not be boarded, inspected or detained except with the permission of the flag state.

The Dutch government “did not consent” to the boarding of the Arctic Sunrise by the Russian authorities, its representatives said. 

While the Dutch government “regrets Russia’s non-appearance” in court, Russia is bound by the outcome regardless of its presence at the hearings, the representatives said.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said last month it does not accept the arbitration procedure and would not send its representatives to the hearing, as the country does not have to participate in disputes that concern “sovereign rights and jurisdiction.”

International supporters of the Greenpeace activists have also claimed they are being detained in poor conditions. Last week Greenpeace lawyers said they may all soon be moved from a pretrial detention center in Murmansk to St. Petersburg, although the reasons for such a transfer remained unclear.

“Winter is coming. My government prays the Arctic Sunrise and its crew are returned home before winter sets in,” the Dutch spokesperson said.

Greenpeace lawyer Daniel Simons also spoke in court, claiming that the organization’s legal team has “not been able to identify any Russian rule prohibiting entry of a safety zone.” The activists were thus told the protest was “entirely safe,” he said.

What both the Dutch and Greenpeace failed to mention was Russia’s repeated warnings regarding the vessel’s provocative actions in the Arctic. According to RT’s official sources, the warnings were completely ignored by the Netherlands.

In August, the Russian Embassy in The Hague in particular warned the Dutch Foreign Ministry that the Arctic Sunrise’s voyages along the Northern Sea Route without Russian permission were unacceptable.

The Hamburg court hearing also ignored Russia’s security concerns, last week reiterated by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Greenpeace activists posed a threat for both the Russian oil rig workers and the environment by disturbing work at the platform, Medvedev said.

The court order date was tentatively set for November 22, Greenpeace said on their website following the hearing. While the maritime court’s decisions are binding to all the signatory countries of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, including Russia, it has in effect no means of enforcing them.

Meanwhile, in Moscow Greenpeace activists staged a protest by sailing in boats along the Moscow River through the city center, holding flags that read “Free the Arctic 30!” The aim of the action was to draw public attention to the case and to protest Russia’s refusal to take part in the Hamburg hearings, Greenpeace said.

Russia initially charged all 30 Arctic Sunrise crewmembers from 18 different countries with piracy, which carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison. Russia’s Investigative Committee later stated that the case has been reclassified as one of hooliganism, carrying a maximum penalty of seven years.  

However, Greenpeace international general counsel Jasper Teulings, speaking to Reuters on Wednesday, claimed that “nothing has changed,” and that all the activists are currently charged with “both hooliganism and piracy.”

Russia has said that it remains “open to the settlement” of the situation surrounding the case outside the tribunal. Last week, Moscow and Amsterdam were holding informal talks to resolve the situation, according to reports confirmed by the Dutch Foreign Minister’s spokesman Ward Bezemer. While he did not disclose the details of the negotiations, he said that there was no secret or controversy regarding the talks.

Before turning into an international scandal, the Arctic Sunrise action was intended as a protest against drilling for oil in the Arctic. Greenpeace said its activists wanted to put a banner on the Prirazlomnaya rig owned by Russian state-run gas giant Gazprom to bring public attention to their claim that it is impossible to sufficiently clean up potential oil spills in the Arctic region.

Comments (30)

 

eslaporte 18.01.2014 20:37

Tell the Netherlands, Europe's new rouge nation, to start enforcing its own laws and mind its own business when other nation enforce its laws.
First, starting with hate speech.

 

Count Cash 13.11.2013 11:29

Look where Greenpeace have correctly lost their charitable status. Everyone knows the charity con, they pay themselves enormous bucks inside, operate as a corporate and declare no profit, because they have taken all in salaries internally and extracted via friends consultancies….. As I said let Greenpeace publish the internal salary structures…., let us audit the transactions. If they are lowly activists, there will not be a problem. Gazprom are a declared corporate they are entitled to make profit, pay what they like internally. They are not a fraud like Greenpeace who are a corporate pretending to be a charity!

 

Rob Dekker 13.11.2013 10:21

Dear "Count Cash",

Greenpeace is a non-profit under US law. That means they cannot make money, only spend it. They have a very strict policy against taking ANY corporate money, and they publicly declare their finances on their (publicly available) 990 IRS forms, which include where their money comed from and exactly where they spend it on.

Now for Gazprom.... I'm all ears. You have ANYTHING ?

View all comments (30)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us