Assange rejects police request to surrender

Published time: June 28, 2012 12:22
Edited time: June 29, 2012 04:29
Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange sit outside Ecuador's Embassy in London June 22, 2012. (Reuters/Neil Hall)
Download video (42.98 MB)
Embed

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has said that he rejects the British police’s request to hand himself in and will remain in the Ecuadorean embassy and continue his appeal for asylum on grounds of political persecution.

­Earlier on Thursday, police issued an order for Assange to appear at a police station to begin the extradition process.

The letter from the Metropolitan Police sent to the Ecuadorian Embassy said it "requires him to attend a police station at a date and time of our choosing. This is standard practice in extradition cases and is the first step in the removal process."

Assange refused to surrender telling BBC: "Our advice is that asylum law both internationally and domestically takes precedence over extradition law, so almost certainly not."

The whistleblower is currently liable for arrest by the UK police should he leave the embassy on the basis that he violated his bail conditions.

He arrived at the Ecuadorian Embassy last Tuesday, appealing for Asylum from the country’s government. Assange hopes to sidestep his removal to Sweden where he is wanted for questioning over allegations of sexual abuse.

He has voiced fears that Stockholm may turn him over to US jurisdiction where he could be tried on charges of espionage. The publishing of thousands of diplomatic wires on the Wikileaks site prompted a wave of aggressive rhetoric from US politicians branding the whistleblower as a terrorist.

The Ecuadorian government has said that it is no hurry to reach a conclusion over Assange’s appeal. President Rafael Correa stressed his government was considering the legal and political consequences of granting asylum and that it had not set a deadline for the decision. He has recalled the UK ambassador to Ecuador to assess the situation.

"We will come to a decision as a sovereign nation which doesn't exclude the possibility of consulting with friendly nations," said the president on Tuesday.

The reason it is taking Ecuador so long to decide is because apart from letters and petitions from activists it is receiving a list of ultimatums and threats from the United States, Sibel Edmonds, the founder of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, told RT. “The State Department is giving Ecuador plenty to think about by showing what kind of consequences they will be facing, whether it’s economical, whether it’s political.”

Julian Assange said that he sought protection from the Ecuadorian government because he had been abandoned by Canberra.

The Australian government disputes this, arguing that they are powerless to intervene as he has broken no Australian laws.

Asssange has maintained throughout the drawn-out trial that the allegations set against him are depthless and politically-motivated

Comments (54)

Bruce (unregistered) 09.10.2012 10:13

yeah, I remember some of it, and I'm not saniyg Duff or Seaton are spot on or anything. It is an interesting idea, no less, to ponder the cui bono with regard to detailed information about US war crimes. See for instance this reaction: I can't help wondering how the international community would have reacted had Israel been accused of similar actions. Many people, at the moment, are focused on the question of whether the documents should have been leaked, entirely skirting the implications of what they actually say; the American administration is currently busy brushing off responsibility, emphasising that this was all under George W's watch. Because yes, this stuff has been going on for years with hardly anyone showing any concern at all; for all the Guardian's fury now, it has taken it years to work itself into this lather of righteous indignation. The numbers were there ages ago, if only they had wanted to see them.Meanwhile, Israel is being put through investigation after investigation following Operation Cast Lead and the flotilla affair forced to answer for every civilian killed under its watch. Funny that. I don't think the next leak will be any different. Revelations of corruption, hypocrisy and shady dealings etc among world leaders will not shock many people any more than civilian deaths caused by US military operations. The US army is not the Bundeswehr, and the American public not the German public. All you need to remember is last March when opinions were sharply divided about who spat in whose face re the settlements and back door treatment during Netanyhau's visit in Washington. Speaking of newly released docs:

0

Undo

Ruskie (unregistered) 02.07.2012 07:15

Give yourself up ya rapist, stop hiding and go to Sweden like a man you rapist, the longer you hide the more guilty you are you rapist... so leave the embassy as they don't want a rapist in there, you rapist... he will get his just deserts the rapist... 

0

Undo

Bad news for Assange (unregistered) 01.07.2012 22:32


The website of the Government of Ecuador in Quito has removed all the positive press reviews and videos and interviews they had about Assange which I carefully studied. They did have a positive stance to him, but somebody has forced them to change that. The fact that they have removed all supporting statements from politicians like the Foreign Affairs Minister Patiño is clearly saying they are preparing to release bad news.

+7

Undo

View all comments (54)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us