Walmart 'failed to protect' dead Bangladesh workers

Published time: November 27, 2012 12:03
Edited time: November 27, 2012 16:22
A firefighter inspects a garment factory after a devastating fire in Savar November 25, 2012. (Reuters / Andrew Biraj)

Walmart has come under attack from labor monitors over the burnt-down garment factory in Bangladesh, which was producing clothes for America’s largest retailer. The company took an evasive position before finally claiming violation of contract.

­On Monday The Nation magazine published photos of charred clothes found in the ruins of the factory with easily-recognizable Faded Glory labels associated with Walmart.

In an interview to The Nation, Executive Director of the Worker’s Rights Consortium Scott Nova accused Walmart’s business model of creating deadly labor conditions in Bangladesh and named the horrible fire as the direct consequence of that model.

Nova, who represents the WRC group that monitors labor worldwide, said that Walmart’s seeking out the “cheapest possible labor costs” in Bangladesh is one of the major reasons for the tragedy. Since the retailer is the largest buyer from Bangladesh it “makes the market” and bears responsibility for what goes on clothing factories in Bangladesh.

Nova told The Nation that it is Walmart’s “industry strategy in Bangladesh: extreme low wages, non-existent regulation, brutal suppression of any attempt by workers to act collectively to improve wages and conditions.” He claimed that the destroyed factory “is a product of that strategy that Walmart invites, supports and perpetuates.”

Immediately after the incident, Walmart issued a statement that it is determining its current relations with the burnt factory, calling fire safety a priority for the company. Walmart’s spokesperson told the New York Times it is “unable to confirm” whether the burnt factory was supplying any goods to Walmart.

This handout photograph released by The Bangladesh Garment and Industrial Workers Federation (BGIWF) and The Bangladesh Center for Workers Solidarity (BCWS) on November 27, 2012. (AFP Photo)
This handout photograph released by The Bangladesh Garment and Industrial Workers Federation (BGIWF) and The Bangladesh Center for Workers Solidarity (BCWS) on November 27, 2012. (AFP Photo)

Now Walmart insists its supplier from Bangladesh, Tuba Group, which owns the Tazreen Fashions Ltd. factory, violated the contract by passing production to a subcontractor.

Walmart says the factory was producing clothes for them without the knowledge of the retailer. The contract with the supplier has been terminated immediately.

“We have terminated the relationship with that supplier,” continues an official statement of the US biggest retailer issued on Monday. The retailer also promised to intensify work with the apparel industry to ensure an acceptable level of fire safety in Bangladesh.

Scott Nova said the death toll in Bangladesh is likely to continue growing since Walmart has no intention to cause obstacles to its supply chain in Bangladesh.

“The only way factories in Bangladesh can survive, given the prices that the Western brands are willing to pay, is to operate unsafely,” said Nova.

Clothing factories in Bangladesh are notorious for total negligence of elementary principles of fire safety. Some 315 people died since 2006 because of numerous fires at the apparel industry factories.

The deadly fire in the country’s capital Dhaka has sparked mass protests of thousands on Monday. Up to 15,000 demonstrators took to the streets, demanding the government take action against factory owners who disregard fire safety as an unnecessary running cost. The protests forced some 200 clothing factories to close.

Protesters gathered at the ruins of the burnt factory in Dhaka’s suburb of Savar. They blocked a major highway, smashed vehicles and threw stones at the factories.

“The owners go unpunished and so they don't care about installing enough security facilities,'' Tahmina Rahman, general secretary of the Bangladesh Garment Workers Federation told AFP. “The owners should be held responsible and sent to jail.”

On Tuesday the government announced a day of national mourning due to the incident. National flags flew half-mast in all government buildings. All clothing factories in the country stayed closed.

Exports of ready-made clothing, garments and textiles make up to 80 per cent (over US$20 billion) of the total exports of Bangladesh. The country has more than 4,000 clothing factories. Bangladesh textile industry employs over three million people, 90 per cent of whom are women.

Up to 95 per cent of the apparel enterprises in Bangladesh belong to the citizens of the country.

In the meantime, police in Dhaka suspect the fire was caused not by a short circuit, but by arson carried out by a local woman, occasionally recorded by CCTV cameras. The woman, who also tried to set on fire another factory, was reportedly arrested.

The fire at the eight-story building of the apparel factory started on the first floor, quickly cutting off all three exits from the building. Survivors stated later that at least one exit was locked, while no emergency exits existed in the building whatsoever. In absence of a central fire-extinguishing system, portable fire-fighting appliances turned out to be out of commission, present only to impress firefighting inspectors. Moreover, when the fire alarm went off, the shift supervisors told seamstresses to return to their sewing machines.

Some people tried to escape the fire by jumping out of the windows of upper floors – many of them died. Others choked to death in the thick smoke of burning fabrics. Many of the bodies the firefighters found in the ruins were burnt beyond recognition.

Later it was estimated that up to 1,000 people could have been inside the building when the fire started.

According to the most recent official figures, the number of victims in what became the deadliest fire incident in years in Bangladesh has reached 112. Dozens more were injured.

­

Comments (13)

roryfan13 (unregistered) 29.11.2012 10:23

@the monk: You are of course right, most/any retailer(s) in any developed country profit from the horrendous conditions in the third world sweat shops and these conditions will not change until 1st world consumers buy locally manufactured products. Which they will have to if they want their countries to remain "1st world". I guess my main beef with wallyworld in particular is the way they treat their employees at home: drug tests, spy camera's, low wages, but most degrading of all-the praising of profits and their overlords at the beginning of each workday. Once in my life I walked into a walmart, right around 7am, and was able to witness the blue drones going through their daily morning routine-the most degrading thing I've ever seen. That was the first and the last time I ever set foot into one. I'm poor and I know the arguments for the retail giants, but there are alternatives and many people I have met since do what I do, they buy their clothes used at their local salvation army or goodwill stores-you'll even help a good cause that way. And occasionally, when I have the money, I buy locally manufactured new products (example: recently bought an "atheist" t-shirt made in the usa, cost $20.00 but worth every penny)-there are always alternatives-use them and save your own standard of living, otherwise 10 years down the road (if mankind is still around) we'll all be "third world". and that's precisely what the "big boys" want!!! 

0

Undo

The Monk 27.11.2012 22:52

As an American, I am ashamed that this happened. Workers are entitled to safe working conditions. However, lets not just look at this as a Walmart problem. If you go into any department store any where's in the world, you see the fruit of this type of labor practices. Look at your clothing tags in GUM, Bloomingdale's, Harrods, Le Bon Marché and most everywhere. What you see are labels from not only Bangladesh but from India, Vietnam, the Philippines, Pakistan and China to name a few. Those labels read Polo, Tommy Hilfiger, Lacoste, Nike, FILA and the like. Many of those clothes are made under poor working conditions. Some of those labels do try and enforce better working conditions but there is no way of really knowing when you make a purchase...and how much you pay is no guarantee!!!

0

Undo

Just_Saying (unregistered) 27.11.2012 22:36

As a US car dealership, if I buy a car from General Motors, am I responsible for auto worker wages and working conditions? Why is WalMart the bad guy? How about the company that contracted to WalMart to make the clothing? How about the company that owned the factory where the fire happened? Oh Wait......... WalMart was making a profit, so naturally they have to be responsible, right?

0

Undo

View all comments (13)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us