Bosnian War casualties still disputed more than a decade on
Published: 16 November, 2009, 10:31
Edited: 17 November, 2009, 10:24
Two Bosnian Croat soldiers pass by the corpse of a Bosnian Serb soldier killed in the Croatian attack on the Serb-held town of Drvar 18 August 1995 in western Bosnia (AFP Photo)
(16.1Mb) embed videoTAGS: Conflict, Politics, Europe
It has been nearly fourteen years since the end of the Bosnian War. However, both sides are still fighting, but this time over numbers – the numbers of those who died during the conflict.
The savage conflict of 1992-1995 left Bosnia and Herzegovina split down ethnic lines, forming Muslim and Serb halves. Since the fighting there has yet been little sign of reconciliation.
Streten Damjanovic is Serb. In 1992 he was captured by Muslim fighters. He still struggles to breathe, let alone walk, from the torture and beatings he received.
At the time he was a soldier with the Serb Republic Army, and the war between Muslims, Serbs and Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina was just beginning.
“They took me towards an apple tree, there was a noose there. They wanted to hang me. They would put the noose on, they would lift me, and then take me down,” Damjanovic remembered.
On the other side of the conflict there is Mejra Dogaz, a Muslim. She lives alone, as the rest of her family was buried at the Srebrenica graveyard. Her husband, three sons, and grandson all rest there after being shot by Serb forces during the same war.
“I lost everything. Three generations wiped out in one day, but I cannot bury myself,” she said. “If I could I would climb into the ground to be with my family.”
Milorad Dodik, the Prime Minister of the Serb minority region Republika Srpska, recently threatened to break away. His remark sparked international fears that the country could descend into chaos again.
The tensions are fuelled by ongoing allegations of what happened in the nineties and, specifically, how many died on either side.
Amor Masovic heads the Bosnian Federation Commission for Missing Persons. He has the names of nearly 30,000 Muslims who went missing during the war.
More than eight thousand of them were from Srebrenica, the scene of the biggest massacre on European soil since World War Two.
“There are plenty more graves that have not yet been opened,” he said. “The number of missing people is likely to be higher because we are basing it on names people have given us. But in some instances whole families were wiped out.”
“Yes, sometimes there are mistakes and it is possible some of the dead names are still alive, but this was war and there was a lot of confusion,” he added.
Some Serbs say the numbers are exaggerated.
“Everybody forgets that there was a Srebrenica before Srebrenica,” said Radovan Pejic from the Team for the Research and Documentation of War Crimes. “I am talking about crimes against Serb civilians – more than 20 villages around Srebrenica, which were ethnically cleansed of Serbs from 1992 to 1995.”
“Yes, Muslims were killed there, but I would say the number is closer to three thousand,” Pejic added.
Radovan and his team have put together 3299 files of Serbs who were killed in Sarajevo. He says there are still many mass graves with Serb victims inside that have not yet been found.
Pejic is convinced the final count will show that more Serbs died in Sarajevo than Muslims in Srebrenica.
Regardless, the battle for numbers, like the battle for truth, does little to bring peace to this part of the world, where the scars of war have not yet had time to heal.
Tourist hotspot in Kashmir under threat of pollutionDal Lake in Indian-administered Kashmir is a magnet for tourists. Famous for its natural beauty and the houseboat hotels which dot the shoreline, the popular holiday destination is now under threat of pollution. |
Female looks reformed for 2014 Winter Olympics cityMillions of dollars are being poured into the Russian city of Sochi to get it ready to host the 2014 Winter Olympics. For the event, the city mayor’s office has introduced a beauty class for its female staff. |












Then why not conduct census? The party that should be most interested in census are Bosnian Muslims. Yet, their politicians, as well as Croats, have successfully blocked every attempt at census ever since the war. The problem is, they know very well that the comparison with the pre-war picture would show that not that many Bosniak's died. So the implausible excuse is that Serbs will benefit from the census? How? By showing that many more Serbs perished or are made refugees then Bosnian Muslims. Croat on the other hand, fear another truth. Ever since the war ended, they have done much to resettle Bosnian Croats to the Krajina region, Serbian region in Croatia from where Serbs were ousted. The project, contrary to the misinformation, was successful. While Croatia largely failed to move Croats into the poor, and predominantly agricultural areas of Serbian Krajina, they were extremely successful by moving them into Krajina towns and even larger villages. Wherever there was any kind of economy going, Croats were moved in, their housing was built, while Serbs were every way scared into coming back. Most of the returnees were old people who are dying, leaving abandoned villages by the hundreds. Census in Bosnia would therefore show a marked decrease of Croats in the federation. Something they would rather not have the world see. Serbian side would be able to show the decline in Serbian population that is due to the war dead and refugees. Bosniaks do not wish the world to see how few nationalities have stayed in once multicultural Sarajevo. Today, under nearly two decades of Bosniaks rule, it is an ethnically cleansed city. So, who is afraid of census? Those that are have much to hide.