Britain outlaws porn users
Published: 30 April, 2009, 09:23
A law is to be introduced in Britain criminalizing users of what has become known as extreme pornography. Some regard it as a controversial piece of legislation and yet another example of an over-intrusive government.
In 2003, Liz Longhurst’s daughter Jane was brutally murdered by an acquaintance. It was later discovered that the murderer was an obsessive viewer of ‘extreme pornography’. Five years on, Mrs. Longhurst believes such violent sexual images were instrumental in her daughter’s death.
“[Pornography] was central. In his particular case, he had this obsession with it. He’d had this fantasy from the age of 15 of strangling a woman with a ligature. Once the internet was there, then of course I feel the internet gave him permission. He realized that he’s not the only one, so I think he allowed himself to go with the flow,” the victim’s mother said.
Following Jane’s murder, Mrs. Longhurst campaigned tirelessly for the introduction of a law that criminalizes not just producers, but consumers of extreme pornography – defined by the courts as an act which threatens or appears to threaten a person’s life.
A link between violent images and violent crime hasn’t been scientifically established, and photographer Ben Westwood feels the stigma against this type of pornography is unjustified.
“Everyone has a sexuality, everybody fantasizes, pornography is the visual expression of people’s fantasy. You’re saying an image can tip someone over from being a normal, law-abiding citizen into a murderer? I don’t think so,” Westwood believes.
Those in favor of the legislation admit it’s not perfect, but they say something has to be better than nothing. Detractors say it is yet another example of a state intent on spying into people’s private lives.
“My worry is that this law is all about the government actually stepping into people’s bedrooms, looking at what happens between consenting adults. It opens up all sorts of questions about privacy and your right to a private life,” said Baroness Sue Miller, member of the House of Lords.
It is, however, little comfort for a mother who was forced to bury her own daughter.
30.04.2009, 09:14
Unpaid vacations for military to cut costsLithuania’s Defense Ministry is offering staff additional unpaid leave as extra measures to cut spending, while the country registers its largest drop in GDP in 16 years. |
30.04.2009, 10:42
1 comment
Outrageous animal cruelty shakes KaliningradA string of attacks on animals in the Russian city of Kaliningrad has caused outcry among locals. The killings are thought to have been carried out by savage fighting dogs in training. |
Because this is such a badly thought out law, we now have a situation in England and Wales, where an individual can be locked up, for up to three years for looking, in private, at images of consenting adults, taking part in perfectly legal activities. They have created a victimless crime, at no point has the U.K. government been able to show any harm, of any kind from viewing this material. In the U.K. you can now be locked up for having "bad taste" and nothing else.
The problem with this poorly thought out legislation is that it applies the same to fake and consensual behavior as to the real stuff. It was a pathetic attempt by a failing and doomed goverment to try and drum up a bit of support from the ignorant masses. It failed. To a lot of people it was just one more reason to kick them out in the next election.
The "mother who was forced to bury her daughter" and the puritans in the English Government appear to have never considered the plight of the mothers of victims of Peter Sutcliffe, the "Yorkshire Ripper" and Steven Wright the "Suffolk Strangler" both of whom killed women because they believed they were "doing God's work" in murdering prostitutes according to their reading of the Bible. That's one alleged victim of so-called "extreme pornography" and eighteen demonstrated victims of the Bible. Why, then, has there been no campaign to outlaw the Bible? Answer: because these people simply have an anti-pornography agenda and they'll use any excuse, milk any tragedy and exploit a grief-stricken mother to get their way. Meanwhile the fundamental liberties of the English People are whittled away a little more...