Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Paving way for ACTA? Canada considers anti-counterfeit bill encouraged by US

Published time: March 03, 2013 14:10
Edited time: March 04, 2013 12:17
Reuters/David W Cerny

Canada has introduced a bill strongly resembling the Anti-Counterfeit Trade Agreement (ACTA), prompting speculation that authorities were prepared to ratify the notorious legislation. The US encouraged Canada to adopt the bill.

According to Ottawa, Bill C-56 or Combating Counterfeit Products Act, is aimed at countering harmful counterfeiting activities, much like the international ACTA treaty.

If passed, the document would mainly concern copyright issues; border guards would be forced to serve as copyright experts without court oversight, and new criminal penalties would be introduced for counterfeiting commercial trademarks.

Under the law, imports of any works copyrighted in Canada but made outside the country would be suspended by the Canada Border Services Agency, if the copyright owner in Canada submits a written request.

The bill has raised fears that Canada may be preparing to ratify ACTA. Washington has recently encouraged Ottawa to comply with the notorious agreement.

In the recently published 2013 Trade Policy Agenda and 2012 Trade Policy Report, the Office of the United States Trade Representative has encouraged Canada to “meet its Anti-Counterfeit Trade Agreement (ACTA) obligations by providing its customs officials with ex officio authority to stop the transit of counterfeit and pirated products through its territory.”

ACTA was intended to become a global treaty; it has been signed by 31 nations, including the US, Canada, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and 22 EU member-states. However, to come into force, it must be signed by at least 6 countries.

ACTA aims to protect copyrights in many industries, from software engineering to agriculture. Critics have said that governments would have to make draconian invasions of online privacy to implement provisions of the treaty.

The EU has already blocked the document, but it was ratified by Japan; the other signatories have yet to decide.

Critics of ACTA have argued the treaty seeks to protect copyright at the expense of freedom of speech. Numerous mass protests were staged in the US and Europe against the controversial agreement.

Comments (25)

Anonymous user 05.03.2013 19:18

A totally ineffective law. Free, encrypted VPNs are available all over the net. Anonymity for all.

0

Undo

Ted Willis 04.03.2013 12:53

Bill C-56 was introduced in the 1970's and is concerned with the number of seats each province has in the house of commons. You mean bill C-30. However you are not to be criticized too hard for that because Canada has a sneaky priminister who likes to hide major changes to constitutional documents inside misleading bills which go before the house. Take C-50 for example, a bill intended to address the budget but secretly included changes to the immigration act. Or C-10 or...

0

Undo

Anonymous user 04.03.2013 11:28

The people of Canada will expose the traitors in government. Harper being one of them

0

Undo

View all comments (25)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us