Chechen president sues human rights group over murder accusations
Published: 25 September, 2009, 16:50
Edited: 27 September, 2009, 10:38
President of Russia's Republic of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov
TAGS: Crime, Chechnya, Human rights, Law, Kadyrov
The Chechen president is suing the human rights group “Memorial” of damaging his reputation. Ramzan Kadyrov is upset that the organization connected his name with the death of activist Natalya Estemirova.
The reason for applying to court was a statement of the group’s head, Oleg Orlov, issued on Memorial’s website.
“I know that I am absolutely sure who is guilty in Natalya Estemirova’s death. We all know this man. His name is Ramzan Kadyrov, the president of the Chechen Republic,” the statement said.
Human rights activist Natalya Estemirova was kidnapped in the Chechen capital, Grozny, on July 15 this year, and on the evening of the same day, her body was found with gunshot wounds in a neighboring republic of Ingushetia.
Ramzan Kadyrov wants the claims to be retracted and is demanding compensation of 10 million rubles (around $320 thousand) from the Memorial group.
“People have to be held accountable for their accusations, especially now that they're calling someone a murderer. Ramzan Kadyrov is the legitimate leader of his region, not some mythical figure,” Andrey Krasnenko, Ramzan Kadyrov’s lawyer, said.
“He does not want to kill anyone, especially Estemirova. He used to say that this woman's actions only evoked pity and sympathy,” he added.
The first day of the hearing began with Kadyrov’s side proposing to sign a peaceful agreement, but the Memorial group rejected it, finding the conditions inappropriate, RIA Novosti news agency reported.
“Our position is irreproachable in view of the law. We have provided a great deal of factual materials, including the recorded statements of Ramzan Kadyrov, as well as his close associates and subordinates. Those statements – I believe – gave me the right to voice my opinion,” Dmitry Orlov said.
Orlov considers Kadyrov’ lawsuit groundless. He explained that, by saying that Kadyrov is guilty of Estemirova’s death, he didn’t mean that the Chechen president was somehow involved in the organization of her murder, but that it was his poor work as the head of the republic that made the tragedy possible.
Earlier, the Memorial group themselves wanted to sue Kadyrov for saying that the organization is “specially designed to disrupt Russia” in an interview with Zavtra newspaper, but gave up its plans.
25.09.2009, 09:52
Dagestan: ten years since bloody assaultIt has been ten years since Chechen terrorists invaded another Russian republic of Dagestan, hoping to win the support of the population in a bid to establish a joint Islamic state. Instead they faced harsh resistance. |
26.09.2009, 14:53
Russia’s largest carmaker to lay off 27,000 workersRussia’s Avtovaz says more than 27,000 jobs are to go due to plunging demand. It’s a severe blow for workers at the company, the largest employer in the city of Togliatti in the Samara region. |
Let's the courts decide. If there is no evidence to back up the accusations. Then let the accusers put their money where their mouth was. It should be made a very substantial amount, if the case is decided in favour of the president. Let's keep to law, let the west do politics.
Unfortunately, many 'non-govenrmental' organizations are funded by governments and have a fairly straight-forward mission: influence the oppinion by disrupting community-based information mechanisms or by forcefull interjection of views, substantiated or not. It is utterly amazing that the legitimate media or othere community-based organizations were unable to foster an open climate that would expose special-interest driven groups. In spite of their outlandish behaviour, and even more outlandish pronouncements, their work is "untouchable". Why? Are many media outlets dependant on special interest funding to such an extent, that openness is just not feasible?