Ecuador may file appeal to ICJ if UK refuses Assange safe passage

Published time: August 17, 2012 13:03
Edited time: August 19, 2012 16:59
The Metropolitan Police stand outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on August 17, 2012 after WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was granted asylum yesterday by the Ecuadorian Government. (AFP Photo / Will Oliver)

Ecuador has said it may appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) if the UK refuses to grant Julian Assange safe passage out of the country.

Eciadorian presidential staff adviser Alexis Mera said his government would pursue every legal means to bring Assange to Ecuador.

"We are open to discuss with Britain the solution to this problem, and if there is no diplomatic solution, we may resort to the International Court of Justice," Ecuadorian daily EL Commercio quoted Mera as saying.

"It would be terrible and an attack on all international rights" if British police were to enter the Ecuadorian embassy, he said.

On Friday Mera attended a cabinent meeting with President Rafael Correa and other ministers in the Southern city of Liba.

The WikiLeaks founder Assange took shelter in Ecuador’s UK Embassy two months ago, with Quito granting him political asylum after careful deliberation on Thursday.

Ecuador’s Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino said that Julian Assange’s rights are endangered as he was at high risk of being extradited to the United States upon being handed over to Sweden by UK authorities.

Patino further stated that Assange’s home country Australia was not providing him with sufficient legal protections, thus facilitating Ecuador’s decision to grant him asylum.

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said that Britain did not recognize Assange’s asylum status and would continue with its efforts to extradite him to Sweden, where he is currently wanted for questioning on suspicion of sexual assault.

Hague reiterated that the UK “will not allow Mr Assange safe passage out of the UK."

But maintaining such an “absurd position” is only pushing the WikiLeaks legal team to bring the case to the International Court of Justice, says spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson.

“Let’s hope that British government will come to its senses and give him safe passage out of the country,” Hrafnsson told RT. “It’s the only right thing to do. But if they are going to insist on this hardline position, which is absolutely absurd given the circumstances, the head of the legal team of Julian and WikiLeaks, Spanish judge Balthasar Garcon, has indicated that he will take the matter before the International Court of Justice and force the UK government to give him safe passage.”

On Thursday, the head of Assange’s legal team Baltasar Garzon said that any attempt by the UK to block Assange’s safe passage to Ecuador would be subject to an ICC appeal.

"What the United Kingdom must do is apply the diplomatic obligations of the Refugee Convention and let him leave, giving him safe conduct," the former judge told Spanish newspaper El Pais.

"They have to comply with diplomatic and legal obligations under the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, and respect the sovereignty of a country that has granted asylum," he told the daily.

The refugee convention defines who is a refugee, the rights of those granted asylum, and the responsibilities of nations which grant asylum. The convention further grants special travel arrangements for individuals who have been given asylum.

In the run up to the decision to grant Assange asylum, the British government reportedly warned Ecuador it could revoke diplomatic immunity for its embassy in London, empowering police to enter the building and arrest Assange.

Patino responded that such an unprecedented action would be a “flagrant violation” of international law.


Comments (68)

Nath rothschild (unregistered) 18.08.2012 21:03

Predictable british puppet governments selective use of the  International Court of Justice, when tony blair should be there for already proven war crimes.People must pressure the media and demand them to tell us the truth, and stop diverting our attention to tabaloid stories. Explain to your papers and radio stations, that they are only putting off going to the dentist, the hole is getting bigger, and it all has to come out in the end. those media corps that will be the last to disclose the truth, will be seen as the 'most bad' and may be hunted down for treason. ( most reporters are fat with expences paid beer bellies) so they will not run for long.And to those that believe they 'have a ticket' do you really trust your distibuters to lie for their existance but tell the truth to you ?

0

Undo

Ary Alv (unregistered) 18.08.2012 18:20

The British 1987 document specifically states acts of terrorism, and Ecuador is not committing such act, so why are the British threatening the Ecuadorean Embassy to storm in and take it by force. If, they do, I call upon citizens all over the world to give the British embassies in their country a taste of their own medicine. 

+1

Undo

Ary Alv (unregistered) 18.08.2012 18:07

I call upon all citizens of the world, the common people, the general masses, not please with British action against Diplomatic Immunity to make it difficult for all Diplomatic personnel and embassies all over the world so they get a taste of their own medicine. They are not absolute!" British Foreign Secretary William Hague and Sir Tony Brenton should kneel before US officials and do a better job.

+1

Undo

View all comments (68)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us