Tomorrow’s foes? Syrian rebels fear foreign Islamist fighters are ‘too extreme’

Published time: August 08, 2012 18:46
Edited time: August 08, 2012 22:46
A member of Jihadist group Shura Taliban Islam writing an Arabaic slogan (No Islam without Jihad) with spray on the wall of the Bab al-Hawa border gate on July 21, 2012 (AFP Photo / Bulent Klic)

The civil conflict in Syria has brought Islamists from all over the world to the Arab country to help their brothers topple the “apostate regime”. But will the foreign allies lay down arms if Assad goes? Syrian rebels are starting to fear they won’t.

­“They are too extreme, they want to blow up any symbol of the state, even schools,” Abu Bakr, a Syrian rebel commander, told Reuters

Concern is growing despite the obvious benefits the influx of foreigners brings to groups who have been fighting to oust the government of President Bashar Al-Assad for 17 months now.

Streaming into Syria, Islamists from many Muslim countries bring with them money, smuggled weapons and extensive fighting experience, a development that has given the amateur uprising the tactical and practical war craft it previously lacked.

"They're extremely effective and secretive. They coordinate with us to attack the regime but they don't take orders from anyone. They get weapons and explosives smuggled from abroad that are much better," says Anwar, a rebel from Aleppo.

The massive aid has made the Syrian rebels capable of withstanding the regular Syrian army and optimistic enough to turn down invitations to talks with officials in Damascus.

"As bloody as it is now, this stage is simple. We all have the same cause – to topple the regime,” says Abu Bakr.

But what makes the rebels different from foreign Islamists is their understanding of where the limits of the conflict lie.

"Our goal is to make a new future, not to destroy everything," says Abu Bakr. “When Bashar falls, we may find a new battlefront against our former allies."

There are fears that, although most Syrian rebels are fighting for an Islamic state, there will be no common understanding of what exactly this state should be, and that the civil war may become an all-out sectarian conflict.

Syria’s Sunni rebels who are fighting Assad’s Alawites, an offshoot of Shia Islam, are becoming intermingled with battle-hardened militants from Afghanistan and Pakistan, citizens of the Persian Gulf states, rebels from Libya and sometimes even fighters with European passports.

The rebels do not always admit foreigners to their ranks, but if they do, they face a clear necessity to moderate some outlooks.

"We're trying to fold jihadis into our group so they back off their more aggressive tactics. That doesn't mean we aren't nervous. They could still turn and rebel against us," a fighter of the 2,000 strong Tawheed Brigade, the biggest opposition military unit operating in Aleppo, told Reuters.

Adherents of Salafism and Wahhabism Sunni Islam branches, as well as idealist jihadists devotedly fighting for “oppressed Muslims”, are all present on the Syrian battlefield. With the millions of dollars flowing their way from the Gulf countries like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, uncontrolled foreign fighter groups are fully autonomous and are capable of buying arms and explosives directly from abroad.

"There are some really extremist battalions that don't cooperate well with us. They stay on their own," adds the fighter.

Most Syrian rebels are young Sunni Muslims from poor rural areas of the country who don’t want to look much further than toppling President Bashar Assad. Some talk of a Sharia-law state, but only after some period of peace and stability. What most are talking about may sound way too moderate for their foreign aides: “a state where citizens are equal, Muslims and minorities,” or “a future not determined by poverty or religion.

In reality, the friendly shoulder of foreign fighters is starting to appear increasingly colder.

Comments (80)

wild goose chase (unregistered) 10.08.2012 21:40

I see RT pulled my post after two days of being posted?..I wonder why they did that!!..is it because i called their beloved terrorist abu bakr a SCUM .. or is it because i suggested that obama's nobel peace prize should be given to Bashar al assad for standing up to the scum of the earth that gathered in Syria with the collaboration of the scum that called NATO to wreak havoc in a peacefull well functioning country..well RT,if thats the case i say go screw your self.

0

Undo

AmericanInRomania (unregistered) 09.08.2012 19:11

JJ (unregistered) wrote in #2
And the Award for "LIAR OF THE MONTH" this month goes to...... give me the envelope....  AMERICAN IN ROMANIA !!!!!!!_____________ ____________________ _________________Sti ll haven't heard, which part did I lie about that I won a prize?  Here is what I wrote, might help you reference it when you enlighten me:The opposition, later turned FSA, has said from day ONE of this conflict that they are willing to make a deal on ONE condition, that Assad leave power.  Kofi Annan, after leading the UN peace mission, stated from his and the UN missions findings in the FT:"For Russia, China and Iran this means they must take concerted efforts to persuade Syria’s leadership to change course and embrace a political transition, realising the current government has lost all legitimacy. A first move by the government is vital, as its intransigence and refusal to implement the six-point peace plan has been the greatest obstacle to any peaceful political process, ensuring the distrust of the opposition in proposals for a negotiated transition."Kofi Annan and the peace mission also found:"While the Security Council is trapped in stalemate, so too is Syria. The government has attempted to suppress, through extreme violence, a popular and widespread movement that, after 40 years of dictatorship, has decided it can no longer be intimidated. The result has been an increasing loss of control on the ground, and the opposition has turned to its own military campaign to fight back." and went further to say:"A mass movement, born in the demand for civil and political rights and the empowerment of voices for change, emerged in Syria after March 2011. But, for all the extraordinary courage that it took for the protesters to march each day in the face of escalating violence by the government, this did not become a movement that bridged Syria’s communal divisions. Opportunities to overcome this were then lost in increasing violence."There will be no peace among Syrians until Assad is removed.  If done properly, as in Yemen, the government infrastructure (police, army, civil service workers..etc) could be left in place and a transition to a unity government could begin to replace the Allawite dominated dictatorship of Syria to incorporate all Syrians.

0

Undo

Captain Obvious (unregistered) 09.08.2012 18:43

tricky (unregistered) wrote in #16 @AmericanInR omania,Captain Obvious (other Christian names that jewry hide behind) and rest of zion InternetDefenceForce

Thankfully no one with any decency cares what you think.************** ******************** **
interesting.  this means you have no decency.  It was obvious from your posts but not everyone bothers reading regurgitated propaganda.  Decent people would not call unarmed cilians terrorist and then cheer as Assad bombs their houses to rubble.  So clearly your status has been known for long time.

0

Undo

View all comments (80)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us