Broken-up Britain? UK epidemic of separated families

Published time: December 29, 2012 19:08
Edited time: December 30, 2012 15:23
(Reuters / Peter Macdiarmid)

Research by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shows that the UK has one of the highest rates of family breakdown in the western world and that only 69% of children live with their mother and father.

The UK came only behind Belgium, Estonia and Latvia for broken homes and well below the average for OECD countries of 84%. The analysis looked at the living arrangements of children between the ages of 0-14 in 30 OECD member countries, it was reported in the UK media.

The worst country for broken families was Latvia with just 64.9% of children living with both parents. Finland had the most children living with both their mother and father at 95.2%. Italy stood at 92%, with Germany at 82%, and the US ahead of Britain on 70.7%.

The statistics also showed that the number of kids in the UK living with just their mother was 27.6%, while children living with their father was just 2.4%.  

Christian Guy from the Centre for Social Justice explained that the figures were a depressing wake up call for UK politicians.

“Timid politicians are becoming numb to Britain’s sky-high family breakdown rates. Behind too many front doors, instability damages adults and children. Yet, as these OECD figures show, broken families are not some inevitable feature of modern society or social progress.”

The Marriage Foundation, a pro-marriage campaign group, said that the figures reflected an “appalling epidemic of family breakdown.”

“The latest UK data tells us that 450 out of 1000 children will experience the break-up of their parents before their 16th Birthday, largely as a result of the trend away from marriage, in particular the collapse away from unmarried families,” said Harry Benson, the Marriage Foundation’s communications director.

He continued that the figures should “convince politicians of all colors of their utter failure to deal with the central social problem of our times.”

He said that family breakdowns cost the government £44 billion ($71 billion) a year but yet they have no policy to reduce or prevent the continued rise of families breaking up.

But Iain Duncan Smith, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions said the government has invested £30 million in relationship support to prevent family breakdown.      

“Across government we’re working to improve the support available for families who experience abuse at home by more effectively punishing the perpetrator and doing more to educate young people about domestic violence,” he said.

In May this year the Centre for Social Justice, a think tank run by Iain Duncan Smith, found that the coalition government was failing to deal with the “tragic breakdown of family life.”

It also found that the welfare system penalized couples.  Overall the report gave the collation 4 out of 10 for measures to “reverse family breakdown” and just 2 out of 10 for their approach to the voluntary and community sector.

Comments (44)

Briton (unregistered) 02.01.2013 22:10

It's the culture of promiscuity, illegitimacy, teenage pregnancy, the breakdown of families and the acceptance of being a single mother as a lifestyle choice, in the UK. This leads to a lot of unmarried women and teenage girls having children without a care. They know that if they do, they can rely on the state to provide for them so they do not have to work or do anything to improve their situation; all paid for by taxpayers. There is actually an incentive to become an unmarried, single mother. Those women don't really care about their illegitimate children, they see them as cash cows because, the more they produce, the more state benefits they can receive, paid for by taxpayers. Another factor is that marriage and commitment are no longer valued by many British people. These are becoming less popular in society so, a lot of people treat relationships and sex, casually. Many people don't consider it important to have long-term relationships.

All of this is encouraged and reinforced by the clueless legal system which ensures that in practice, men have less rights to be part of their children's lives than women. A lot of men can't get access to their children after the relationship with the children's mother breaks down. Even when a court orders it, it is not enforced in many cases. Many unmarried mothers deliberately prevent access or play games to make it as difficult as possible, while the legal system enforces no kind of sanctions against them, for doing so.


All of these things happen while many single mothers don't even consider how the absence of their illegitimate children's fathers, affects the children. They don't care how it affects their children, all they care about is what they want; being a single mother as a lifestyle choice.

0

Undo

Gordo Broonski (unregistered) 31.12.2012 16:26

Socialism as practised by Gordon Brown fixing the family wages by supplements called family credits to set a minimum wage was an extraordinary mecha nism and now deemed unworkable. Peoples income varies month by month and who knows what goes under the table in cash. Billions have been wasted on this state controlled income policy. The American system is far more practical assessing the family income at the end of the year and taxing at a reasonable amount. Who needs the government topping up your family income. Gordon Brown was a control freak. And paying cash for having babies called child benefit at 100 pounds per month per sprocket. Fraud the only result as foreigners cashin and go home. Britain then opens the door for accountants fiddling all the taxes for the rich by avoiding stamp duty on home purchases. No wonder theres no money in the kitty. VAT 25%?

0

Undo

duncan lucas-registered 31.12.2012 14:42

RIGBY=You come across as "upper class twit" and snob from the arrogant home counties. Who just wants "FUN"= debauchery like many in the 18th/19th Century who belonged to the "Hell-Fire" Club  On the other hand you could be here just to "wind up" anti-west posters.then you might be paid for posting. I thought people like you had "died out"But life's not so kind to the "underclass" as you like to call us.You are an anachronism in this 21 CENT. But maybe you are one of Camerons "rising stars" Whichever disguise you are under they are not appropriate to a web-site that mainly speaks for the PEOPLE/Socialism Maybe you should post on the House of Lords  web-site???    

0

Undo

View all comments (44)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us