Female genital mutilation – tradition or torture?

Published time: June 26, 2009 16:45
Edited time: August 24, 2010 17:06

Female genital mutilation, usually associated with Africa, the Middle East and South-East Asia, is a growing problem in Europe. Despite criticism, the barbaric practice is thriving with more immigrants coming to Europe.

The operation, in which parts of a girl’s clitoris and labia are cut off, causes urine retention, infertility and death, and those lucky enough to survive such a process will never enjoy sexual relations. UNICEF says over 130 million women and girls are suffering from the aftermath of this procedure worldwide.

“The blood pumped out in waves. Words can't describe the pain. The bleeding was so bad I was rushed to hospital. That is why I am celibate to this day,” remembers Christine Beynis, one of the victims, living in Paris.

In states like Egypt, most women are cut. The practice is now spreading from Africa and Asia to immigrant communities worldwide. More than 100 million suffer globally.

The annual circumcision event begins and ends with prayer services. (Stephanie Sinclair)
Some religions state that female sex organs are sinful, and must be removed to stop intimate pleasure. Hawa Greou served five years in French prison for mutilating 48 girls.

“It’s my tradition, my grandmother and ancestors are all excisors. No one’s ever died after my operations,” she said.

Critics insist the practice is barbaric and must be stopped regardless of cultural traditions. Lawyer Linda Weil-Curiel, who put Greou behind bars, has to fight white male colleagues, who say banning foreign tradition is neocolonialism, and dub the method “female circumcision”.

“They would use the word circumcision, which I will not hear of. Because if you did to a young man what


The girl who was being soothed in the second photograph, after her circumcision. (Stephanie Sinclair)
is done to a young woman, he wouldn't say I have been circumcised, he would say I have been mutilated, and right he would be, because it’s equivalent to chopping off the penis for the boy, so for the girl it’s the clitoris and the labia,” the lawyer said.

Hawa Greou now says mutilation is wrong, but in many communities girls will continue to be cut, and men order the crime to be committed. Officials say France alone has more than 50,000 victims.

Linda Weil-Curiel's success in court made the state go after the practitioners, but has just pushed the problem elsewhere. Even though the practitioner case has led to France convicting mothers who mutilate their daughters, many instead take their children on special “holidays” abroad.

Ines Laufer, founder of the Hamburg-based Task Force for Effective Prevention of Female Genital Mutilation, says there is a solution.

Watch interview

downloadembed

“I think in Germany authorities have gone in the right direction,” Mrs. Laufer told RT.
“We already have several court decisions that stop girls from being taken to the country where they are at risk of being submitted to genital mutilation. In Germany 14 girls are being protected already – their parents have not been allowed to take them to the countries.”

Genital mutilation, she says, simply cannot be justified.

“All the girls, all the children who live here [in Europe] and abroad have a fundamental right to an intact body, to physical and mental health,” Mrs. Laufer said. “And banning genital mutilation is nothing more than guaranteeing this fundamental human right to the children.”

“The best way of addressing this problem is through education,” said Dr. Abdelhadi Eltahir, a senior adviser to the Washington-based Maternal and Newborn Health at Pathfinder International. “They have to realize that this practice is harmful.”

Watch interview

downloadembed

This practice can be stopped, says victim Khady Koita. 20 years after her own daughter was mutilated, Khady has written a book about it and is fighting the practice. It has nothing to do with religion, but is rather a tradition, says Khady. And can be stopped through dialogue, she says.

Watch interview

downloadembed

Comments (20)

Anonymous user 02.05.2013 16:43

Why does it have to be tradition OR torture? It can be both.

0

Undo

Pip Power (unregistered) 04.02.2013 15:54

The following quotation is taken from Reliance of the Traveller, Revised edition, amana publications, Beltsville, 1997. The title page informs us that this book is   The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law ‘Umdat al-Salik
by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with
Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices
Edit ed and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller
In this book, in the section titled "THE BODY", we find on page 59 the following entry: Nuh Hah Mim Keller's TranslationArabic O riginal e4.3    Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. Bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)" The above used abbreviations mean: A: ... comment by Sheikh 'Abd al-Wakil Durubi Ar. Arabic n: ... remark by the translator O: ... excerpt from the commentary of Sheikh 'Umar Barakat However what the Arabic actually says is: Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female)
by cutting off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male,
but circumcision of the female is by cutting out the clitoris
(this is called HufaaD). {bold emphasis ours} The Arabic word bazr does not mean "prepuce of the clitoris", it means the clitoris itself (cf. the entry in the Arabic-Engl ish Dictionary). The deceptive translation by Nuh Hah Mim Keller, made for Western consumption, obscures the Shafi’i law, given by ‘Umdat al-Salik, that circumcision of girls by excision of the clitoris is mandatory. This particular form of female circumcision is widely practiced in Egypt, where the Shafi’i school of Sunni law is followed.  

0

Undo

Zulu (unregistered) 28.11.2012 02:46

"This practice is not ordained by Islam, or commanded anywhere in Quran. This is a completely un-islamic practice. Most muslims do not practice female genital mutilation. In fact female genital mutilation is considered an evil practice by most muslims. This practice is primarily rooted in tradition, mainly in Africa and its adjacent countries. Therefore, people in these countries( muslims and nonmuslims) engage in this practice out of tradition. However, because of their long tradition, at some point they start assuming that it's a religious practice." Shut the hell up you ignorant lying idiot, female genital mutilation was introduced by the arabs in Africa. The whole idea is centred around jealous husbands not wanting their wives to become sexually stimulated and promiscious. But they the muslim husbands can marry up to eight wives. What a bunch of dessert dumbells. 

0

Undo

View all comments (20)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us