Food retailer enlightened: Putin serious about slashing prices
Published: 26 June, 2009, 09:19
Edited: 04 March, 2010, 08:33
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (2R) looking at prices inside a Perekrestok supermarket in Moscow (AFP Photo/Ria Novosti/Pool/Alexey Nikolsky)
A surprise visit to a food chain store by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin prompted critical remarks from the PM, causing the retailer to drop its prices the very next day.
During a planned meeting devoted to drafting a law on state regulation of trading activities in Russia, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin stated that he needed to see firsthand the details at the heart of a confrontation between retail stores and manufacturers.
A few minutes after the prime minister spoke, his motorcade was already moving in the direction of a supermarket belonging to one of Moscow’s biggest retail chains.
The visit came as a total surprise to the store’s management, as well as a stunning occasion for the customers present during his visit.
Comparing the prices for products with those in his documents, Vladimir Putin asked the retail chain’s managing director Yury Kobaladze why the pork meat which is supplied to the chain’s stores at 160-170 rubles per kilogram is being sold at 335 rubles. The prime minister expressed doubt that such a profit margin is “normal”.
“Actually it is two times more expensive. Is that normal?” Putin said.
Kobaladze immediately responded that “the prices will be cut down the next day.”
But the next morning, commenting on the issue to radio station Ekho Moskvy, Kobaladze unexpectedly said that “there was no criticism toward retail chains on the part of Putin,” and that the words about cutting down prices on some products were “torn out of context” by the media.
He expressed belief that “it was a normal conversation and there was place for some, so to say, jokes in it.”
“What does that mean: ‘we’ll cut down prices tomorrow’?” Kobaladze said. “I have made no such formal announcement.”
His statement, however, is contradicted by a press release circulated by Kobaladze’s X5 Retail Group just hours later, which says that “special additional actions are already underway, in the framework of which 350 items of goods are sold today with a profit margin not more than 5% and 150 items without a profit margin at all,” according to a report by RIA Novosti news agency.
Moreover, the press release adds: “Next week, prices for ten more items of meat products will be cut down, and a grand bargain sale starts on July 1 in all X5 Retail Group’s Perekrestok supermarket stores, where the prices for more than 3,000 items will be cut by 30% to 80%.”
It seems that after mulling over the issue, Yury Kobaladze eventually came to the opinion that the conversation was not quite a joke after all. Perhaps it was his long experience in the foreign intelligence services that finally gave him a clue.
Criticism can be costly
![]() AFP (Alexey Nikolsky) |
On occasion Prime Minister Putin’s critical remarks can cost a man his fortune. Last year one of Russia’s leading metallurgical companies, Mechel, lost more than one-third of its market value after Putin criticized its pricing policy.
Putin said that Mechel was selling its raw materials domestically at double the price of its exports, and threatened punitive action against the company, which is owned by Russian billionaire Igor Zyuzin.
The affair cost Zyuzin about half his wealth, though no strict sanctions followed. The company was subjected to a minor fine.
In 2006, Vladimir Putin, in a sudden decision, ruled to move the East Siberian-Pacific Ocean pipeline, the construction of which was just due to be started, from Lake Baikal to avoid environmental problems in the future.
Diverting the pipeline added an extra 500 km to the route and almost doubled the initial cost of the project to $11 billion.
Fired girls get 33 sacks of coins from ex-bossAfter fighting to get their former boss to compensate them for their dismissal, two girls from the far eastern Russian city of Vladivostok finally got 33 sacks of money – but were not happy with the money they got. |
Team Russia returns to finish Volvo Ocean RaceAfter eight months of tearing around the world’s oceans in yachts, participants in the Volvo Ocean Race are heading to the finish line in St. Petersburg. They have started the final leg from Stockholm. |
NZ had a Prime Minister (Rob Muldoon) in the early eighties who instigated a "price freeze". He was annoyed at increasing prices, as was everyone then with inflation. Rob Muldoon was popular at the time for this. He had a very strong persoanlity - people were afraid of him due to his undoubted intelligence and quick thinking. Must admit I voted for him. Subsequently, he proved to be the downfall of the NZ economy at the time, and today, with the benefit of hindsight, his price freeze is considered foolish. Matters of inflation are "controlled" outside the political arena these days. muldoonism,, as it is now called, is bit of a joke these days. What the producer gets for a primary product (eg. meat) and what it sells for at retail is an issue here today too. Eventually the market will sort itself out. There are better ways to deal with these matters than some behaving here like Putin has.













People should read the article properly, there is nothing wrong with anybody pointing out the margins involved in the industry, this is quite a legitimate thing to do, it is consumer education. In Russia food retailing is changing, as it did in many other countries as they moved to supermarket based selling. In the beginning, the Supermarket can always offer an advantage of greater ramge and one stop shopping, whilst even increasing on the type of margins that the smaller outlets need to employ to survive, because Supermarkets have the advantage of economies of scale. It is the supermarkets choice, to offer this customer proposition, and maintain prices as long as possible until competition from other supermarkets, forces a donward competitive correction of prices. There was no mention of prize feezes at all, which of course try to buck the market, and will always fail. However, the situation, is not as simple as it seems. The model above works providing there is a true free market, free of the type of western supermarket cartels and free of our organised crime and corruption that controls the ability for competition to exist. Then market forces can kick in properly and regulate the market for the consumer and also the supplier. Without this the customer looses and the supplier losses. This is what is happening today in both the west and the east, but for different reasons. Now we can't buck the market, but we should ask ourselves what food do we want, do we want to go down te cheap, fattening, rubbish cheap food route of the west. or do we want to try to develop a more healthier, fresher, more local product, that mainatins peoples health, and has more overall benefit in the overall cost funtion, by removing resulting health costs associated with the rubbish sold in the west at knock down prices. This is where standards and government can have a role to play. Then we avoid the sub optimsed cheap today, expensive tomorrow cycle of rubbish western food and the health costs associated with it.