Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Merkel: Russia to face massive damage if no progress made on Ukraine

Published time: March 13, 2014 14:47
Edited time: March 13, 2014 18:08
German Chancellor Angela Merkel lays out her governments policy on Ukraine by addressing delegates at the Bundestag, Germany's lower house of parliament in Berlin on March 13, 2014. (AFP Photo / Odd Andersen)

German Chancellor Angela Merkel lays out her governments policy on Ukraine by addressing delegates at the Bundestag, Germany's lower house of parliament in Berlin on March 13, 2014. (AFP Photo / Odd Andersen)

Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel has warned that Russia risks “massive political and economic consequences” if it sticks to its position on Ukraine. On behalf of her EU and Western counterparts, she said they support imposing sanctions.

"We would not only see it, also as neighbors of Russia, as a threat. And it would not only change the European Union's relationship with Russia," Angela Merkel said. "No, this would also cause massive damage to Russia, economically and politically."

Speaking in Germany’s Reichstag on Thursday, Merkel said that EU members and other western nations, if necessary, are prepared to freeze bank accounts and impose travel restrictions on people and firms that Brussels suspects of being involved in violating Ukraine's territorial integrity.

"The territorial integrity of Ukraine cannot be called into question," Merkel told German MPs.

As Crimean leaders adopted a declaration of independence from Ukraine, they cited the situation in Kosovo.

But Merkel said it was "shameful" to compare the independence of Kosovo with the referendum in Crimea.

“And even if there had been other breaches of international law – Kosovo not being one of them – Russia's actions in Ukraine are still a breach of international law," she added.

However, critics of the European Union’s and the United States’ stance disagree, however.

“I think you can compare it, of course,” Paul Hampel, a member of the right-wing Alternative for Germany Party, told RT. “NATO interfered in Yugoslavia. Germany, for the first time since World War II, got into a war against the country. So that was the same situation. There was a strong national group – the Albanians in Kosovo – and it wanted to become independent from Serbia. Why not compare them? This is the same situation as in the Crimean peninsula.”

The sanctions Chancellor Merkel was talking about could be approved by EU foreign ministers as soon as Monday.

Later in the day, US Secretary of State John Kerry echoed Merkel’s statement, saying that Monday will be the day when Europe will take “a very serious series of steps.”

The measure will follow, if Russia refuses to enter "negotiations that achieve results." So far, Merkel said, she had failed to persuade Russia’s President Vladimir Putin to negotiate via a "contact group." Last weekend Merkel and Putin had a phone call, during which she offered to form an international contact group. Its aim would be to find a political way to end the conflict in Ukraine.

Russia has repeatedly said it considers the referendum and actions of Crimean authorities reasonable and legal. This week, Russia’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement that Moscow would respect the results of the referendum.

The US, which also denounced Russia’s position on Ukraine, has already passed a resolution imposing sanctions against Russia, including visa restrictions against anyone “who threatens the sovereignty” of Ukraine.

Economic talks with Russia on hold

On Thursday, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) announced that it had postponed all activities related to Russia's accession to the organization. The decision came on request from its 34 members, which include such economic heavyweights as the US, Germany, France and Japan.

Instead, the OECD is going to strengthen cooperation with Ukraine to help it get through "public policy challenges it faces."

It has been seven years since Russia was originally invited to join the OECD, but the accession process has been way more difficult than for other member states. The offer to join came from the OECD more than 10 years after Russia made its official request in 1996. It was four years after it started cooperating with the organization in 1992.

In general, the OECD sees Russia’s presence as a "win-win endeavor" that would help the country modernize its economy, Secretary General Ángel Gurria said in June 2013.

Despite the OECD’s decision, Russia says it is going to continue working on agreements with the OECD.

“Unfortunately, the OECD took a political decision to suspend the procedure of Russia’s accession. There is no doubt that this fact will have an impact on the rates of the accession,” a Russian government official told Itar-Tass.

Russia to fight back

Russia, meanwhile, said it would retaliate with counter-sanctions if the EU and US impose economic measures.

Economic Development Minister Aleksey Ulyukayev, said Russia will fight back against any sanctions from the West.

Speaking to the Russia-24 TV channel on Thursday, Economic Development Minister Aleksey Ulyukaev said: "We need to bravely go ahead, first with our oil and gas companies.”

European leaders are set to meet next Thursday to discuss action affecting trade with Russia.

However, lessening economic ties with Russia may hit the EU just as bad.

Germany, particularly, gets over one-third of its gas and oil from Russia. Russia is Europe’s biggest customer, and the $13 trillion economy would suffer, should the restrictions be imposed.

"To be absolutely clear, none of us want it to come to such measures but we are all ready and determined to if they are unavoidable," Merkel said.

The warning from Germany comes three days before Crimea holds its referendum slated for March, 16. On Saturday, the republic is set to decide its future: either it stays with Ukraine or joins Russia.

However, the EU and the US consider the referendum illegal as it violates “the Ukrainian constitution and international law.”

Comments (319)

 

Tj Taylor 16.03.2014 23:45

Is it better to impose sanctions now or wait till Putin intervenes in Bulgaria or another frontier of NATO?

I would argue sanctions now to avoid war later.

 

Freaky 16.03.2014 07:40

Anthurian Pale 15.03.2014 22:09

Angela May be a scientist but she lacks wisdom and thinks too scientifically. I live in Europe so what I am about to say will impact me too. If sanctions are imposed on Russia, then there will be counter measures from Russia.

Freezing of Russian assets, excuse me! Thats stealing! What Putin will do is cut the gas supply to Europe and that will cause a high energy bill on the Europeans. Further, this could escalate to a third World War. Russia will simply take back what belongs to them.

  


It is good to act like that, the NATO/US becomes to arrogant

 

Freaky 16.03.2014 07:37

@Zviad Kavteli

Of course when it is not in their interest they cry like little children.
What about Kosovo....? invasion of the USA is not so many different from the Russians.
And the Russians have to deal with scumb@g Neo Nazi's
who terrorise innocent people.
I can name you a dozen of things where the West goes wrong and where another allies Israel, never obey UN resolution.
The armed Russians are there to protect the people from Neo nazi's. There is nothing wrong with that.

(...T he only country who says otherwise is Russia, that is why Russia vetoed. What does that tell you....)

It tells me you are biased

View all comments (319)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us