Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Monsanto-backed GMO giants launch website to combat anti-biotech sentiment

Published time: July 30, 2013 13:34
A screenshot from gmoanswers.com

A screenshot from gmoanswers.com

A group of biotech seed companies have launched an online forum to rebuff disapproval of genetically modified foods across the world. Activists and consumer groups are skeptical, saying the industry has a ‘track record of being anything but transparent’.

The website is said to be partly backed by the biotech US giant Monsanto, DuPont and Dow AgroSciences, according to Reuters, as well as by other companies whose products feature ingredients that have been genetically altered in ways the companies claim improve food production.

Founders of www.GMOAnswers.com say the website was created “to do a better job answering your questions — no matter what they are — about GMOs.” Its launch is part of the biotech industry’s campaign to respond to concerns for GMO food labeling and tighter regulation in the US.

One user from Newtown, Pennsylvania identified as Sorgfelt posted a question on the website asking whether he could trust any research done on GMOs that has the imprimatur of the Missouri-based Monsanto. He query was prompted after learning “from practical experience that, in order to get a job with Monsanto, or do any research that is supported by Monsanto, or even to publish research on Monsanto seeds, that all of my work would have to be approved by Monsanto.”

“This makes it very difficult to have legitimate third party research to rely on,” Sorgfelt, whose question has yet to be answered, added.

Meanwhile, biotech industry players say all they want is dialogue on the issue.

"This... is an effort to increase the dialogue. That is all we want," Paul Schickler, president of DuPont Pioneer told Reuters. "Dialogue is good. Over time I think we'll come to a common understanding."

People hold signs during a demonstration against agribusiness giant Monsanto and genetically modified organisms (GMO) in front of the White House in Washington on May 25, 2013. (AFP Photo / Nicholas Kamm)

Activists argue that the newly-established website won’t help stop the consumer backlash against genetically engineered foods that has been brewing for years.

“…the industry has a track record of being anything but transparent. They spend millions in marketing and lobbying against popular GMO labeling efforts. Their control of patents has prevented research from being done on the long-term impacts of biotech crops and food products. This latest public relations blitz is just more of the same from an industry that is struggling to combat popular sentiment that genetically engineered foods are unlabeled, untested and unsafe,” Executive Director of Food & Water Watch, Wenonah Hauter, said on Monday.

“More claims from the biotech industry about the safety of genetic engineering are not a replacement for the clear labeling that consumers are demanding,” he added. 

Concerns over safety of genetic engineering

Protests against Monsanto have become a frequent event across the globe. Earlier this month the world's largest seed-maker said it would drop its bid to grow some of its genetically modified crops in Europe after a number of European countries, including France, Germany and Italy, established bans against genetically-modified organisms. 

Protesters march on the Meir in Antwerp on May 25, 2013 during a protest against the American multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation Monsanto. (AFP Photo / Jonas Roosens)

The company’s corporate spokesman explained that Monsanto would offer its biotech crops only to those who want them.

"We're going to sell the GM seeds only where they enjoy broad farmer support, broad political support and a functioning regulatory system," Thomas Helscher told Reuters in May. "As far as we're convinced this only applies to a few countries in Europe today, primarily Spain and Portugal."

The company is also looking to gain its share in the corn market in Ukraine. Eastern Europe, as well as South America, are currently the key growth areas for Monsanto.

Another issue raising public concerns is the labeling of GMOs products, which usually go onto supermarket shelves unmarked.

Last year, Monsanto and other industry members spent $40 million to defeat a ballot initiative in California to require labeling of GMO food, Reuters reported.

The Natural Products Association, the nation's largest association for natural products representing 1,900 food industry players, has recently called for all foods containing genetically-modified organisms to be accurately labeled under a uniform standard, so consumers can “make educated decisions about foods they purchase”.

In March, grocery retailer Whole Foods announced that by 2018, all products in US and Canadian stores must be labeled if they contain GMOs. This is the first national grocery store to set a deadline for genetically modified ingredients labeling.

“We are putting a stake in the ground on GMO labeling to support the consumer’s right to know,” co-CEO of Whole Foods Market, Walter Robb, said. “The prevalence of GMOs in the US paired with nonexistent mandatory labeling makes it very difficult for retailers to source non-GMO options and for consumers to choose non-GMO products. Accordingly, we are stepping up our support of certified organic agriculture, where GMOs are not allowed, and we are working together with our supplier partners to grow our non-GMO supply chain to ensure we can continue to provide these choices in the future,” he added. 

In June, Chipotle Mexican became the first US restaurant chain to reveal GMO ingredients after it begun labeling all the ingredients the grill burrito group uses that contain genetically modified organisms.

Comments (47)

 

Chris Foresta 01.08.2013 00:27

While Manning and Snowden are being tried as CRIMINALS, Monsanto gets a free pass??? They are lying ..The Monsanto Protection Acts expires SEPT 30 2013..We need to STAND UP ..Genetic Chile

 

Alex Shepherd 31.07.2013 19:08

What a surprise! All of the academics and professors that answer your questions on GMOAnswers.com are paid by Monsanto. It is also clear that there are normal "users" that are on the payroll too. Be advised, this website is nothing more than the GMO industry's propaganda.

 

J McPherson 31.07.2013 16:22

The simple question being avoided is this:
"If GMO is so wonderful and great- why the reluctance to label it"?

I would think if a product is supposedly so wonderful- why NOT label it?

IMHO, I see GMO as one global castrophe in the making. And in reponse to one comment - I am working on a short story that could adapt readily to a movie script about nature responding in it's adapting to GMO. Now to find some film maker/collaborative to finish the story into a shooting script.

View all comments (47)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us