Dead Guantanamo detainee identified as Yemeni who won, then lost, freedom

Published time: September 12, 2012 01:28
Edited time: January 11, 2013 20:20
This image reviewed by the US military, show two members of the military walking out of the "Camp Six" detention facility of the Joint Detention Group at the US Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, January 19, 2012. (AFP Photo/Jim Watson)

A Guantanamo Bay detainee who was found dead in his cell over the weekend was identified as Yemeni Adnan Latif. He was desperately battling his confinement for over a decade and had been court-ordered to be released in 2010.

­Identified by the military as Adnan Farhan Abdul Latif, from al-Udayn, Yemen, the deceased was among the first detainees taken to the prison after being captured at the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in December 2001 following the US and NATO invasion of the country.

Latif died in solitary confinement, in Camp 5, which holds prisoners who have violated the facility's rules. He had been disciplined for splashing a guard with a "cocktail," a mixture of food and bodily fluids, said Navy Capt. Robert Durand, a spokesman for the prison.

Latif’s name was not initially released until after his relatives were notified. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service is still investigating the cause of death, but has not yet released the official autopsy results.

Latif's lawyer, David Remes, blames the US prison system for his client’s death.

"He was so fragile – he was so tormented that it would not surprise me if he had committed suicide," Remes said. "However you look at it, it was Guantanamo that killed him."

It also appears that Latif had been mentally unstable. "He did try to commit suicide many times, by hanging… he swallowed screws, he swallowed plastic garbage bags," Remes said.

In a letter to his lawyer, Latif called the prison "a piece of hell that kills everything." In another, he wrote that his life had become a living death, saying that "ending it is a mercy and happiness for this soul. I will not allow any more of this and I will end it."

It has also come to light that Latif was ordered by the US District Court in Washington in July 2010 to be released from prison.

But in 2011 Washington overruled that decision, arguing that Latif was an al-Qaeda combatant recruited and trained in Afghanistan by the Taliban.

It is still uncertain whether the prisoner was among the Yemenis cleared for transfer by President Barack Obama's Guantanamo Review Task Force in 2009. Latif's lawyer says the government's secrecy rules  prevent him from commenting on that in particular, but “he was never a threat to the United States and should never have been brought to Guantanamo. He should have been released long ago, not just because he was innocent of any wrongdoing, but because humanitarian considerations cried out for his release."

Obama imposed a freeze on returning prisoners to Yemen after a Yemeni-trained Nigerian, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, tried to blow up a Detroit-bound plane on Christmas Day 2009.

“His death is a reminder of the human cost of the government’s Guantanamo detention policy, and underscores the urgency of releasing detainees the government does not intend to prosecute,” stressed Remes.

Thomas Wilner, a lawyer who has spent years defending Guantanamo Bay detainees, says the story of the dead prisoner is a terrible tragedy that reveals how innocent people fall victim to Congressional mongering.

“Although President Obama promised to close Guantanamo and get these guys out, there’s been tremendous opposition, primarily in the Republican party – fear-mongering by the Republican party – saying that all these guys are dangerous terrorists,” Wilner told RT. “And against that fear-mongering, frankly, the Obama administration has not been strong enough, courageous enough to stand up to it and take it onto the public. So you get a guy who is innocent, or at the very least poses no risk, and he has been there all these years.”

Comments (18)

Laowai in Guangdong (unregistered) 23.09.2012 14:34

Nazi Germany occupied most of Europe and imprisoned citizens of countries other than Germany, often times half a continent away in Greece or Norway, on the territory of Poland in Auschwitz under the imbecile claim that these were the enemies of the Reich.

The United Statelets occupied most of the Middle East and imprisoned citizens of countries other than the United Statelets, often times half a globe away in Pakistan or Yemen, on the territory of Cuba in Guantanamo under the imbecile claim that these were the enemies of "Freedom".

0

Undo

Peter Jennings (unregistered) 14.09.2012 10:15

@Monk, a few points, if I may,
point 1: if the US admin did have al qaeda's second in command, yet released him and kept this young man for 10 years on less evidence than they would have on an al qaeda No2. That does not compute.

Poin t 2: if they have released some inmates and they have gone straight to Syria to fight for the FSA, then they either have been turned, or brainwashed.

Every fool now knows who is funding these people, and why, and it's pretty clear that a lot of these guys were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Guilty of being an Afghan or Pakistani or by just being there. As is the case of the fifteen year old lad who was killed having a B-B-Q with his american father.

We all know how al qaeda came to be and who is running it. Hence al qaeda's No2 was caught and released to carry on the confusion. We've all seen the films where the undercover guy has to get busted too, otherwise the game is up.

I think your enemies are closer than you think.

0

Undo

The Monk 12.09.2012 18:55

These people just didn't do nothing to get there. There is a history like the recently killed Al Qaeda's 2nd in command in Yemen who was released and went back to his evil ways. They are there because they killed innocent people...and should stay there like any other criminal in any other country in the world. Their crimes were not just made up. They were caught and incarcerated. Many are released such as mentioned above. But what about the incorrigibles? What about the ones that say they would go back and start killing again...what about the ones who were released and are now in Syria fighting with the FSA??? You can't have it both ways in your arguements about their release!!!

0

Undo

View all comments (18)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us