Heated debates as WWII commemorated
Published: 01 September, 2009, 12:55
Edited: 14 October, 2009, 07:00
TAGS: Anniversary, Military, Russia, Politics, Europe
Leaders from around the world are in Poland to mark the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War Two. The country was the first to face the Nazis’ attack on September 1, 1939.
Memorial ceremonies are being held in the city of Gdansk, the scene of the first battle. Later in the day, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin will be among the guests paying tribute to the victims of the bloodiest conflict ever.
After six years of horror the Soviet Union put an end to the war, having paid the highest price for the victory over fascism, with 27 million of its citizens’ dead. However, the roles different countries played in the conflict are still a matter of debate.
Few realized back in 1939 when Germany invaded Poland that the events which followed would claim 70 million lives.
When it was finally over empires would fall, superpowers would rise and the world as people knew it would change forever.
When Soviet soldiers raised a red flag over the Berlin Reichstag, nobody argued that the Soviet Union was a liberator. Decades on, however, things are being viewed differently.
“When Eastern Europe and Baltic states joined the European Union history immediately became a big subject, because we wanted the crimes committed by totalitarian Communism to be recognized alongside all the crimes committed by Nazis,” Sandra Kalniente, a member of the European Parliament, explained.
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were among those for whom history became a big subject. Despite the fact they had long established an official Day of Deportations, they have added a new Memorial Day to their calendar: August 23. Now, victims of Nazism and Stalinism are commemorated together.
The Russian President was one of the first to react to the news:
“One can have different attitudes toward the Soviet Union; one can be critical of the Soviet Union’s political regime and the leaders of what was then our country, but one should understand which country killed people and which country saved people and ultimately saved Europe,” Medvedev said.
![]() Germany: Picture dated from April 1945 shows Soviet soldiers at the Seelower Hoehen battlefields (AFP Photo) |
One nation which supports Russia and strongly opposes equating Nazism and Stalinism is Israel and the country’s President, Shimon Peres, vehemently highlighted this fact.
“I'd like to stress that in Israel, unlike the rest of the world, we don't celebrate the Victory Day on the eighth of May. We celebrate it on the ninth of May just like Russia. Thus we wanted to pay tribute to all the victims of the USSR and to show our solidarity with a country without which victory over fascism would be impossible.”
Russia showed its solidarity with Israel by building a synagogue and a Holocaust memorial in the country’s most sacred park.
The memorial to victims of the Holocaust is part of Victory Park in central Moscow. Russia erected the monument to the six million Jews who were exterminated during World War II. Israel has always paid back with the same respect. It is one country which has never doubted the role of the USSR in defeating Nazism.
The main wish of Russia's Eastern European neighbors is for Moscow to acknowledge that the Soviet Union occupied them along with Hitler and to compensate them.
Many historians point out that Eastern Europe had been divided long before the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.
It was a year earlier, in 1938, in Munich that Hitler, with the consent of Britain, France and Italy tore up the continent on paper. It later decided the fate of Poland, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania and Latvia.
“The main plan of the Reich concerning Latvia was the complete assimilation of locals with Germans, because Latvians were a so-called race-friendly people. To forget this now and to say Latvia would have flourished and prospered under Hitler and remained independent is stupid,” Aleksandr Gaponenko, the director of the Institute of European Studies in Latvia explained.
In the 70th anniversary year since the outbreak of the Second World War, the debate on its aftermath rages more than ever. With Eastern Europe badly hit by the financial crisis, turning to history has become part of the political agenda. If early elections take place, history could become a strong argument for voters after other arguments have played out.
Read also: Eastern Europe: Caught Between Their Own Past and Nazi/US New World Order
Palestinians continue to suffer at border checkpointsIt takes up to two hours to cross the border between Palestine and Israel. However, in order to make a living, thousands of Palestinians do it daily. |
01.09.2009, 15:04
24 comments
Poland planned destruction of USSRRussia’s Foreign Intelligence Service has published documents revealing the pre-WWII Polish leadership’s plans for the partition and subsequent annihilation of the Soviet Union, informs RIA Novosti news agency. |
Marzipan is still repeating that Estonian Nazi's didn't exist, and that the big bad Russians are to blame for all the worlds ills. Goebbels was wrong. Endlessly repeating a lie does not make it truth.













I think the politicians shouldn't get involved in bickering about history. It isn't what Russia was that is important today; it is what it is that is important. As regards that, its present values are much more important than the accuracy of its view of whether or not they were upheld them in the past. As regards Estonian Nazis, I would be surprised if there weren't anyway. From what I've heard partisans fought on all conceivable sides. Some fought for the USSR, some fought for the Nazis, some fought for independence from both totalitarian states, and they all fought each other. As a general rule, the peoples of Eastern Europe hated living under Soviet rule, and when the Nazis came they were greeted as liberators by the natives who misunderstood their intentions. The Nazis planned to kill over 30 million Slavs to make way for German colonization and intended to enslave the Slavic peoples. No rational Slav aware of this would therefore be pro-Nazi. But the Slavs didn't know the Nazis' intentions for them, and many were anti-semitic admirers of Hitler and therefore fought for him. Others saw both the Nazis and USSR for what they were, in other words brutal totalitarian states, and therefore fought for independence from both of them. Still others fought for the USSR. As for Russia, it broke the back of the third Reich at an enormous cost. If it hadn't done so the Germans either would've won the war or else the allies would have done so at a much greater cost than they ended up incurring. The US lost a mere 300,000 men in WW2 while tens of millions were killed on the Eastern front. For this reason, however we may interpret the aftermath, I believe the US owes a great debt to the Russian soldiers who fought and died in the war against Hitler and thereby saved our men. I also think that the USSR was the lesser of 2 evils. But I think you are fighting a vain battle if you claim it wasn't evil.