On a mission: UN nuclear watchdog arrives in Iran

Published time: January 29, 2012 16:10
Edited time: January 30, 2012 20:27
Herman Nackaerts (L), head of a delegation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), talks to journalists on his way to Iran at the international airport in Vienna January 28, 2012 (Reuters / Herwig Prammer)
Download video (53.86 MB)
Embed

UN nuclear inspectors have arrived in Iran to examine the county’s atomic activities. Tehran says it hopes the visit will remove western allegations of nuclear weapon development.

­The International Atomic Energy Agency delegation including IAEA Chief Inspector Herman Nackerts and Deputy Secretary-General Rafael Grossi will spend three days in Iran. They will hold talks with officials and possibly visit the Fordo nuclear facility near the city of Qom in central Iran, where enrichment of uranium recently started.

Iranian officials say they are certain the talks will prove the nuclear program's purpose is purely peaceful.

We are inclined to be very optimistic about this visit. Iran does not conduct any secret or underground operations. All Iranian nuclear activities are transparent, and we as well as the opposite side are interested in finding a way out of the present situation," said Iran`s Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi.

But Middle East expert and US Congressional candidate Paul Heroux told RT the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear weapons program is debatable.

“The IAEA has found some evidence that doesn’t prove, but suggests that maybe the program is designed for nuclear weapons purposes.”

The IAEA visit comes at a time when relations between Iran and the West are extremely tense. On Monday, EU members agreed to impose an embargo on Iranian oil starting July. There were also reports that Tehran is considering an immediate embargo of its oil exports to EU countries.

However, Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi from the University of Tehran told RT the current standoff over Iran’s nuclear activities is a means for the West to reassert its waning influence in the world.

“The United States and Europeans are basically engaging in acts of war against the Iranian people, as Ron Paul, the US presidential candidate, said himself. I think most Iranians believe that the United States and the Europeans are losing ground in the Middle East and throughout the world, and this is an attempt to seriously hurt Iran at this juncture,” he said.

“The economy of Western European and North American countries – in comparison to their rivals – is on the decline.The only thing that they [the United States] have going for them is a very powerful military."

Marandi also argues Iranian sovereignty is a stumbling block to continued US domination of the region’s oil wealth.

“Arab regimes and dictatorships in the region are all aligned to the United States, and independent countries, except for Russia, really don’t have all that many choices for oil. China, for example, depends on oil from countries that are aligned to the United States. And Iran, since it’s an independent country, if the United States was able to bring about a change in the Islamic republic and overthrow the political order there, obviously that would put China in a very difficult position. So the Iranians believe that the real issue is not the nuclear program:it is Iran’s independence and sovereignty.”

­Author Michael Winter believes the outcome of the IAEA mission largely depends on the people “we are dealing with,” adding that if the inspectors are honest nothing new will be found.

“The sad fact is that we are not dealing with honest people when it comes to the US and EU and IAEA. They will create the evidence they need or may even perform an outright fabrication to justify their aggressive program.”


­Iran will never satisfy West’s demands

­Sasan Fayazmanesh, Middle East Studies program coordinator and professor emeritus at California State University, says we should not expect any breakthrough from this visit of the IAEA to Iran, as “it is impossible” to resolve all the issues during a short three-day trip, especially because the actual issue is “regime change.”

He also thinks that the results of the IAEA findings are largely irrelevant.

“If it was not for the issue of nuclear development in Iran, it would have been the support of terrorism in Iran. If it wasn’t for that, it would have been the lack of human rights in Iran. So basically what we are dealing with are excuses,” he said, adding that, “it is very similar to the case of Iraq.”

Commenting on the recently adopted EU embargo on Iranian oil exports, Fayazmanesh said it would not really affect Iran`s economy.

“It is not going to affect Iran that much because they probably can sell that oil to other countries. But it is possible that it will have an effect on the price of oil. It is very difficult to say what the effect would be.”


Comments (12)

bravewarrior (unregistered) 08.07.2012 00:34

When the UN nuclear weapons inspectors arrived in Baghdad-they American members were CIA agents, looking for bombing targets that would be struck in the war that had been years in planning. There are no acceptable compromises that the US empire will accept-short of total capitulation. No doubt the Iranians, with the help of their allies will have many surprizes in store for Western military asset. It is a dream to expect a peaceful resolution. The army, government and people of the great Persian people, with centuries of history behind them should prepare for war. Sad to say but true.

0

Undo

mosen219 30.01.2012 15:46

Is there any hope of an independent & unbiased report from IAEA this time?
Will they have enough courage to stand up for the truth this time?
How can we be sure that critical information will not be leaked by the IAEA to the US and Israel military and secret services for planning further terriosrt attacks and war against Iran?
How can we ensure that this inspection will not be hijaked by the US and the West for propaganda?
Will the UN be able to show enough leadership to bring the US ambition to start the WWIII under control?
Why is the rest of the international community sitting on its hands and allowing itself to be bullied and pushed around in this way by the US/Israel interest?
Who is benefitting from all this hostility and termoil?

+7

Undo

Popa Ionut 30.01.2012 09:22

US does not have much room for maneuver even Brezinski said so.US today cant deal with Iran trought military mean casue that would mean disaster that why they are so anxious and upset its because why Iran is not obeing them ??they find it difficult to adjust to another type of world order so in maintaining the old they wanted to do it militarily but that is impossible even they develop the new bomb.My message to America is as follows:America when you think of war against Iran first think where you should find a new place for Israel to move.Maybe in puerto rico or somewhere :) because they wont be able to live where they live now.Iran wants to be recongnized for what is it why you want to take theyre achievments away from them?Despite your covert war against them and economic pressure they grew more stronger and united theyre people even more so the only way is diplomacy.Wake up and adjust.

+7

Undo

View all comments (12)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us