Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Controversial Irish abortion law comes into effect

Published time: January 01, 2014 18:23
Lucinda Creagon holds an anti-abortion placard in front of the gates of the Irish Parliament building in Dublin (AFP Photo)

Lucinda Creagon holds an anti-abortion placard in front of the gates of the Irish Parliament building in Dublin (AFP Photo)

A law allowing abortion in some circumstances when a woman’s life is considered to be in danger has come into force in the strongly Roman Catholic country of Ireland, despite clinical guidelines for doctors to follow not yet being in place.

The Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act allows abortions where doctors believe there is a threat to the life of the mother.

The controversial law was passed in July after the death of Savita Halappanavar who was refused an abortion while miscarrying in October 2012.

The 31-year old Indian dentist was denied a termination because her life was not thought to be at risk but died a week later of septicemia.

Irish Health Minister James Reilly said that the Coalition government would not be taking any more measures and that the abortion issue is now dealt with. He added that the precise guidelines on the legislation will be worked out by the Medical Council.

“The one outstanding issue is the clinical guidelines, which are a matter for clinicians and totally out of our control.There will be clinical guidelines for obstetricians from the Institute of Obstetricians and for psychiatrists from the Royal College of Psychiatrists,” he told the Irish Independent.

Reilly insisted that abortions can be carried out without the guidelines being in place.

If a woman’s life is thought to be at risk, then one doctor can make the decision to allow her to have an abortion. However, if there is deemed to be a substantial risk to a woman’s life from suicide then the assessment involves three specialists including a gynecologist and two psychiatrists.

Pro-Choice supporters hold placards in front of the gates of the Irish Parliament building in Dublin (AFP Photo / Peter Muhly)

The abortion issue was a divisive one in Ireland, which is a staunchly Roman Catholic country.

“This is a hugely emotive issue that has divided Irish society and has been avoided by several governments. And I did undertake in the Dail (parliament) early on that we wouldn’t be the seventh government to leave it behind us,” he said.

The government has said that the new law does not weaken the general prohibition on abortion in the country, which sees many Irish women travel to the UK to terminate pregnancies. Abortion will still not be allowed when a woman has been raped or when the fetus has serious deformities.

Caroline Simons from the Pro Life Campaign said in July that the law will now make it possible to target the life of an innocent human being.

“Despite what the Taoiseach and others claim, the new law is life-ending, not life-saving. The government brought forward this law in the full knowledge that abortion is not a treatment for suicidal feelings and ignored all the peer reviewed evidence showing that abortion has adverse mental health consequences for women," she said.

Mara Clarke, director of the London-based Abortion Support Network, which raises money to help Irish woman pay the costs of having an abortion in Britain told the Guardian in July that the law will only enable a tiny minority of women to have abortions and the vast majority will be in exactly the same position they were before the legislation was passed.

“I'm not an expert on Irish abortion law. I am an expert in what happens to women when access to abortion is restricted. Even if this law is enacted, only a very, very small percentage of women who need abortions will be able to access them in Ireland,” she said.

Comments (12)


Marge Gursey 24.07.2014 00:08

It's not "an agonizing choice" here in the states. 1.2 million abortions per year. Over 56 million in the last 40 years. I hope you don't aspire to the callous attitude we have here. It's not enough that it's legal or widely available-we have to force those with a strong moral objection to pay for it (thereby participating). Seems that for many women, this is just another form of birth control.


Geoff Giles 02.01.2014 16:10

Whiskey drinking, bomb throwing nincompoops...
w ait, that's America!


Shintaro Ishihara 02.01.2014 11:37

That even one woman, Savita Halappanavar, died because of physicians' inability or unwillingness to make a decision, is unforgivable. Nobody just waltzes into a clinic on a whim and says, "Let's do it!" It's an agonizing choice, which should be respected, regardless of one's faith. But a safe procedure should be a right for those who've arrived at that decision.
Same goes for people who choose to end their lives, for whatever reason. The facility should be there, with checks and balances, so they can die with dignity.
I agree that life is a right. But I say clearly, it is not a duty.

View all comments (12)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us