Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

​Japan indicates US could bring nukes into its territory in case of emergency

Published time: February 15, 2014 04:04
Edited time: February 18, 2014 06:16
The U.S. Navy's USS George Washington aircraft carrier (Reuters)

The U.S. Navy's USS George Washington aircraft carrier (Reuters)

Tokyo suggested that it would allow the US to bring nuclear weapons into Japanese territory in the event of a serious threat to its security.

In a briefing with lawmakers, Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida outlined conditions that would lead Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government to make exceptions to Japan’s longstanding posture against possessing, producing, or allowing nuclear weapons within the nation’s borders, Kyodo News reported.

Kishida said the Abe administration adheres to the policy of its predecessor: Whether or not Japan would "adamantly observe the (non-nuclear) principles despite threats to people's safety depends on the decision of the administration in power."

"The future cannot be determined in advance," Kishida said, echoing comments by former Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada of the current opposition Democratic Party of Japan. In 2010, Okada disclosed that Japan and the US had agreements during the Cold War era in which Tokyo would allow the US to bring nuclear-armed submarines into Japanese ports in an apparent violation of the non-nuclear policy. The agreement expired in the early 1990s, upon the end of the Cold War.

Abe said last month it was a “mistake” that previous administrations led by his Liberal Democratic Party avoided acknowledging secret US-Japan pacts that had been declassified in the United States.

Kishida’s comments come amid heightened tensions between Japan and China thanks to a heated territory dispute in the Pacific. Last week, US Secretary of State John Kerry met with Kishida to stress that the US will support Japan in the conflict.

Late last year, China declared a portion of the East China Sea between Taiwan and Japan to fall within its exclusive economic zone, infuriating Japanese officials who had long considered that region to be within their control. In an almost immediate response, the US mobilized in the region and sent surveillance craft and B-52 bombers over the air defense zone in defiance of China’s wishes.

The two countries have further clashed in their respective claims to a small group of islands, known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China.

"I... underscored that the United States remains as committed as ever to upholding our treaty obligations with our Japanese allies,” Reuters quoted Kerry as saying, referencing the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between both nations signed in 1960.

"The United States neither recognizes nor accepts China's declared East China Sea [Air Defense Identification Zone] and the United States has no intention of changing how we conduct operations in the region," he added, according to the Associated Press. "We are deeply committed to maintaining the prosperity and the stability in the Asia-Pacific. And that won't be possible without respect for international law, including freedom of navigation and overflight.”

The US has numerous military bases in Japan and across the region, and would be obligated to provide military assistance under the mutual cooperation treaty should China launch a strike in an attempt to strengthen their hold on the disputed territory.

Comments (81)

 

al len 21.04.2014 13:41

Japan's got to have their own nuclear weapons too. I think Japan knows their limitations, they've been abiding with their own non-aggression laws and now are being threatened into another war with now the aggressors and greedy Chinese! I think the US should allow Japan to produce nuclear weapons under US control and authority so Japan can retaliate if China sends them some.

 

Riley 20.04.2014 00:41

Japan just loves getting nukes from the US. I always find it funny that the only country to have massacred a civilian population with nuclear weapons (twice) considers itself the one with the right to decide who's trustworthy enough to have them.

 

AJ Zebadua 25.03.2014 12:40

As a Canadian that spent part of my primary education in Okinawa, and more time in Tokyo and Osaka, I've never been in favour of the American-Japanese Defence pact or American nuclear weapons held in USJF bases. The pact is entrenched in Japan's modern constitution, enforced by Japan's surrender following the extreme calamity of American warmongering at the conclusion of the Second World War.

With Article 9 banning possession, production, and the introduction of nuclear weapons in Japanese Territory - along with other unnecessary weapons such as ICBM's, the Diet should not allow the USJF to introduce banned weapons.

View all comments (81)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us