Breaking news

Obama announces restrictions on drone strikes, pledges to close Gitmo

Military intervention in Syria will lead to catastrophe – Lavrov

Published time: August 18, 2012 14:49
Edited time: August 19, 2012 00:48
RIA Novosti / Sergey Pyatakov
Download video (18.6 MB)
Embed

Military action in Syria will lead to catastrophe, Russia's Foreign Minister has said. Russia opposes US demands for a no-fly zone over Syria, he said, adding that the solution to the ongoing conflict is the Geneva accord peace plan.

The international community reached an agreement in Geneva in June calling for a transitional government in Syria to bring an end to ongoing and bloody conflict in the country.

Different interpretations of the document began to emerge shortly after the accord was adopted, with Washington insisting that the document required that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad leave power. Moscow contested this interpretation, saying the document made no such claim.

“Statements, saying the document [Geneva accord] is as good as dead imply that someone seeks a pretext for military intervention. This is worrying as it can only lead to catastrophe in the region,” Lavrov said in an interview with Sky News Arabic.

Any proposal that stipulates the disarmament of only one party in the conflict was “unrealistic,” he said, adding that “Such proposals are aimed at regime change and not at curtailing the conflict and saving Syrian lives.”

Russia does not support the Assad regime, but rather works in the interest of the Syrian people and regards ending the ongoing violence in the country as its priority, Lavrov said. Moscow also rejects the imposition of any no-fly zone over Syria as a violation of Syrian sovereignty, he said, referencing recent statements by Washington.

Washington and Ankara are reviewing all possible measures to help rebels overthrow the embattled Assad government, including the implementation of a no-fly zone, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on August 12.

“We do not feel isolated because of our stance on Syria, on the contrary we maintain political dialogue with everyone,” Lavrov said, arguing that there is no single Arab country that would regard Russia as isolated.

When asked about the nickname – ‘Mr. Nyet’ – given to Lavrov recently by Arabic and western reporters, he embraced it: “I hadn’t even heard about it,” Lavrov told Sky News. “If international law is not being violated then I’m happy to be ‘Mr. Nyet.’”

Comments (114)

AmericanInRomania (unregistered) 20.08.2012 17:46

Interesting assessment, Mr. Lavrov.... What do you call it now, if not a catastrophe?    Looks like the Russian plan of doing nothing has got us to this point...

0

Undo

happyhappy joyjoy (unregistered) 19.08.2012 20:21

I can only presume you are being sarcastic with this obtuse comment; firstly because of your user-name (moron99), and secondly because it's been widely reported, and for over a year, that many if not most of the rebel fighters in Syria are foreigners, plus thirdly, the rebels themselves have admitted several time to be working alongside Al Qaeda. So obviously you were not being serious within your remarks as that would make no rational sense.

+2

Undo

Mechta 19.08.2012 19:43

Moron99 (unregistered) wrote in #6
        Just saying (unregistered) wrote in #7

         And consider this; if the 'rebels' were to 'win' after destroying the country, they have already admitted they're working with Al Qaeda, so guess who takes possession of one of the largest arsenals of modern anti-tank munitions, advanced anti-aircraft systems, and advanced anti-ship missiles in the middle-east? Lavrov is correct, it will be a "catastrophe" for everyone.
--
    nah, there is only one catastrophe looming.
      The rebels are the same people you saw in the markets, streets, and 
      busses for your entire life. 
--

These so-called rebels have consistently demonstrated they're anarchists.  Precisely how is it beneficial for Syrians to destroy the entire fabric of their society, kill off their entire populace and render their country to anarchy?  Or is it more likely that imperial powers desire this in order to prevent the Muslim world from uniting and fully controlling their resoures and finances thus eliminating the imperial banking/corporate warlords who profit from destroying entire countries?

+1

Undo

View all comments (114)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us