‘Russian pre-emptive strike on ABM shield 'unjustified’ – NATO chief

Published time: May 04, 2012 17:29
Edited time: May 04, 2012 21:29
Military personnel at the radar station of Moscow’s ABM system (RIA Novosti / Ramil Sitdikov)

NATO’s chief has called Russia’s threat of a pre-emptive strike on European missile defense systems ‘unjustified’. But while NATO maintains the ABM shield won’t threaten Russia, Moscow demands they back their words with legally-binding guarantees.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s comments on Friday followed resolute statements made by Russian officials at the Moscow ABM conference on the previous day.

Rasmussen described comments made by Russia's military chief-of-staff that Moscow may consider a pre-emptive strike in certain circumstances as “unjustified”.

"Our missile defense system is not technically designed to threaten Russia in any way and we have provided that information to the Russians. Politically, we don't have any intention to attack Russia,"Reuters quotes him as saying.

On Thursday, Nikolay Makarov had said that “considering the destabilizing nature of the [American] ABM system, namely the creation of an illusion of inflicting a disarming [nuclear] strike with impunity, a decision on pre-emptive deployment of assault weapons could be taken when the situation gets harder.”

Claiming that Russia and NATO had many shared defense interests, Rasmussen added "the best way for the Russians to see with their own eyes that our system is not directed against them would be to cooperate actively."

"We will continue our dialogue with Russia and I hope one day in the future we will reach an agreement," he continued.

However, last October NATO rejected a joint missile defense system proposed by the Kremlin, saying they could not entrust its security to countries outside the alliance.

Moscow staunchly opposes the deployment of a US-backed anti-ballistic missile (ABM) shield along its borders. Russia says that as it is the only country possessing a nuclear arsenal capable of threatening US supremacy, the ABM shield would diminish its security and upset the strategic balance of power in Europe.

Moscow has long sought legally-binding guarantees from Washington and NATO that the missile systems will not target Russia.

Russia has also promised to deploy short-range Iskander missiles in the Kaliningrad Region and hinted at putting missile defense radar in Transdniester if a more satisfactory compromise on missile defense is not forthcoming.

While Washington says it has not ruled out legally-binding guarantees on AMB, none have been forthcoming.

On Thursday, the US under-secretary of state, Ellen Tauscher told reporters at the Moscow ABM conference “Russia is constantly speaking about guarantees of ABM systems not targeting it, but we think we need to come to cooperation. We provide guarantees after we start cooperating.”

Comments (26)

No Fear (unregistered) 26.07.2012 08:06

"Russian pre-emptive strike on ABM Shield unjustified".

Mr Rasmusse, please stop bleating.  Be a gentleman and a good fellow and remove the ABM missiles from European soil.  This is how war starts, fear and aggressive moves.  This is no longer the Soviet era, we do not threaten you so don't point a dagger in my face. And I won't have to shoot you with Kalashnikov in my coat pocket.  Be a good chap now and lower that dagger and put it away ... Now .. isn't it better to be friends?


No-fool-or-pushover

0

Undo

Popa Ionut 08.05.2012 19:36

This missile system is not against Russia but it will be when its finished against Russian intrests.For example Iran.Russia does not want Iran attacked.These war talk from US is just talk to justify the sanctions against Iran.I think that the European part of the shield is meant to protect Europe or Nato against missiles from Iran or Middle east when US will attack those countries.Because US will attack Iran but not now.They will attack them when the shield is in place even if Iran will have Nukes.They will be primitive compared with the ABM  US plans to deploy.The bottom line is US will attack Iran in couple of years when the shield is finished.These US shield is not defensive at all.

+2

Undo

jones 08.05.2012 16:11

Steve (unregistered) wrote in #5
Let's be real here and not kid ourselves any longer. Right or wrong, if Russia attacks those missile sites, we all know what Nato's response will be. Russia will be vaporized, along with the West and pretty much anything that's still living will soon die from the fallout.   I cannot believe the comments I have been reading.
ha.. . if Russia really do a pre-empt strike on the ABM you think they won't be monitoring if there are more nuclear launching across the world?... I think if Russia really do determines to attack, it will go all out and vaporize everything that is anywhere near the word NATO... Unless NATO don't act after the strike, then maybe, the whole thing may be avoided. At that point of the game, there is only two scenarios. One, Russia launch and destroys the ABM and NATO do nothing. Or Russia launch, Nato then launch, Russia then find Nato launch so Russia send every single nuke all over Nato countries...

+3

Undo

View all comments (26)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us