Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Ego building? NATO erects $1bn HQ as members slash military spending

Published time: November 14, 2013 08:43
Edited time: November 15, 2013 11:51
 The director of the NATO headquarters project and program manager Tony Carruth speaks with journalists as he presents the the new NATO headquarters under construction in Brussels on November 13, 2013. (AFP Photo/Virginia Mayo)

The director of the NATO headquarters project and program manager Tony Carruth speaks with journalists as he presents the the new NATO headquarters under construction in Brussels on November 13, 2013. (AFP Photo/Virginia Mayo)

NATO is constructing a bold, new headquarters in Brussels, but the $1 billion project is raising eyebrows at a time of economic hardship and military spending cuts. It also suggests the Western military bloc is here to stay.

The sprawling steel-and-glass complex, which features four extending claw-like structures extending on both sides and a grandiose 105-foot-high (32 meters) entrance, will be headquarters for more than 4,000 NATO staff from the 28 member states starting in 2016.

Although the old NATO headquarters was built in 1967, and is said to have outlived its usefulness, critics are questioning the timing of the lavish new construction, coming as it does amid a deep economic crisis for many European nations.

"When defense budgets are being cut and in general when governments are under so much pressure from taxpayers to save money, it looks terribly extravagant," Daniel Keohane, head of strategic affairs at the FRIDE think tank in Brussels, told Reuters.

The timing of construction of the eight-floor structure, which contains enough blast-proof glass to cover 10 football fields, was "unfortunate," Keohane said.

However, NATO officials have defended the billion-dollar structure. 

A view of the current NATO headquarters (Bottom) and the new headquarters under construction (Back) in Brussels on November 13, 2013. (AFP Photo/Virginia Mayo)  

Matthew Klimow, a NATO deputy assistant secretary-general, said the new headquarters was "far from extravagant."

"It is a functional building that will allow us to say to the world that NATO is ready for 21st-century challenges," he told Reuters during a media tour of the new complex.

Klimow said the soon-to-be-abandoned NATO headquarters was designed to last for just a decade when it opened in 1967.

NATO alliance members have shared the expenses of the new complex at a time when many are being forced to cut key military capabilities - not to mention social welfare plans - due to a tight budget squeeze.

Construction of the new NATO facility comes at a time when the military bloc, originally conceived as a bulwark against Soviet power, has approached a crossroads.

NATO also faces questions about its future after it ends combat operations in Afghanistan at the end of next year.

What’s next for the military bloc?

Construction of the new NATO facility comes at a time when the Western military bloc, originally conceived as a bulwark against Soviet power, has approached a crossroads in its history.

As NATO prepares to wrap up its decades-long military operation in Afghanistan, which was anything but a success, the Western military bloc seems hard-pressed to convince the world of its relevance as global conflicts have subsided.
Thus, the 28 member states have been spending their time, not to mention a lot of money, holding massive military games around Europe.

Last week, NATO concluded a two-week military exercise, dubbed 'Steadfast Jazz,' which involved more than 6,000 multinational troops. It was the largest NATO exercise and first live-fire drill the military bloc has held for seven years.
Next year, NATO will conduct yet another exercise, codenamed 'Trident Juncture' in Portugal and Spain, which is expected to involve the participation of some 40,000 personnel.

These expensive, large-scale military games are attracting criticism since they are happening amid an economic downturn that is forcing European governments to impose harsh austerity measures on government social programs.
At the same time, non-NATO member states, like Russia, are attempting to understand why the military bloc continues to press eastward without any discernible enemy on the horizon.

US and NATO, for example, have begun revamping a military base in Romania which will serve as part of the US-built missile defense shield in Europe. The system remains a bone of contention in US-Russian relations, with Russia saying it would upset the strategic balance in the region.

Moscow has demanded legal guarantees from Washington that missile defense systems deployed in Europe would not target Russia's strategic nuclear deterrence capabilities. Washington has refused to grant Russia such assurances, citing a need to protect Europe from ‘rogue states' like Iran and North Korea.

Late last month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said "missile defense remains a burning issue," adding that Russia’s position is well-known.

"We are ready for a constructive dialogue with the US and NATO and are open to finding a compromise, but let's not pretend that there is nothing within the scheme of the American-led ABM that needs to be changed, nor that it’s not against Russia, that all this talk can somehow settle things,” Lavrov said.

Eastablished in 1949 in response to the rise of the Soviet Union, NATO never disbanded after the Soviet Union collapsed and the Cold War came to an end. Instead, it began to take in a number of eastern European countries, and currently it has made overtures to countries in Russia’s sphere of influence, including Georgia and Ukraine.

NATO continues to oversee some 5,000 soldiers in Kosovo, as well as an anti-piracy mission in the Indian Ocean. It also has plans to field a dramatically reduced training mission in Afghanistan from 2015.

Robert Bridge, RT

Comments (19)

 

Enrique 15.11.2013 11:59

If NATO doesn´t adopt an agressive stance against Russia, for example in Georgia, it is a way for Russia to save money as it keeps the Western flank quiet and peaceful, with a firm Anglo-American control over the European Protectorate, especially Germany (which is just a modern colony)

And that allows Russia (and America) to take troops and Defense capabilities to the Pacific Rim.

 

David 14.11.2013 21:33

A shovel ready job sustains proletariat for a time but never creates wealth. I would be more concerned with what NATO is going to do in that building than the concerned over its construction. The United Nations is a failed experiment seeping tyrannical filth from its seams. NATO is at least supposed to be none but allies, yes, that second word Allied. We'll see. It needs an overhaul and maybe the work described in this article is a positive step in that direction. ;Russia wants in. Hmm...It seems like an extortion to bargain for membership by promising to point missile systems in a different direction.

 

Babeouf 14.11.2013 21:25

The primary purpose of NATO is the military organisation of Europe as part of the US imperial project. And just like the Roman Empire this requires grand buildings to impress on the colonized peoples the power and grandeur of the United Sates of America and the divinity of its President.

View all comments (19)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us