New UN resolution on North Korea close
Published: 11 June, 2009, 08:48
TAGS: Arms, Conflict, Military, Nuclear, UN
Key members of the UN Security Council have agreed a draft resolution on tougher sanctions against North Korea in response to North Korea's recent nuclear bomb test and weapons program.
The draft resolution will be discussed at a meeting of the full 15-nation Security Council, then it will be put to a vote on Friday.
The proposed sanctions aim to further curtail North Korea's financial dealings with the outside world, freeze company assets and expand an arms embargo.
It will also demand Pyongyang return to talks about its weapons program and halt further nuclear tests.
However, according to Russia’s UN envoy Vitaly Churkin, the draft resolution rules out the use of force. "The resolution excludes any use-of-force measures for solving the problems that have arisen," he said.
The official went on to say that the document left the door open to resuming negotiations and the possibility of revoking the sanctions.
He noted that a “political message” should be sent by the resolution, pointing out that the current situation contains “proliferation risks.”
Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has discussed North Korea during a meeting with his German counterpart Frank-Walter Steinmeier in Moscow.
“We concentrated on the issues that are particularly urgent today – disarmament, arms control, non-proliferation,” the Russian minister said. “It is enough to mention the recent nuclear test in North Korea, which essentially annulled the progress we have achieved in strengthening the Non-Proliferation Treaty and in decreasing tension in North East Asia. The UN Security Council will soon offer a collective response to the situation.”
Lavrov also called for the resumption of six-party talks on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
For more than two weeks Russia, the US, Britain, France, China, Japan, and South Korea have been working on a draft resolution to respond to the underground nuclear test that North Korea carried out on May 25.
Meanwhile, there have been growing tensions over reports that North Korea is planning to carry out a new long-range missile test.
Elsewhere, White House officials have announced that the United States could shoot down any North Korean missile if it was fired towards America.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the US is capable of protecting itself against any North Korean threat for a number of years.
11.06.2009, 07:49
Waste, fraud and abuse in U.S. wars – reportThe US Defense Department has failed to adequately manage tens of billions of dollars in contracts paid mainly to private companies supporting military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. |
11.06.2009, 09:02
3 comments
Patient blinded after surgery on the wrong eyeAn elderly patient has taken legal action against a Moscow clinic after going in for eye surgery, only for the doctor to operate on the wrong eye, but has received little compensation or comfort. |
There are two or three issues involved here: 1. We don't have a one world government, so who can dictate to another nation. 2. Like with all bully nations and rogue states, you have to stand up to them at some point. 3 Where does a nation's rights end, such as a rogue nation with nuclear weapons and an attitude. 4 Last, what do you do with a nation with an absolute dictator. Do you punish all his people for his actions?
Come on Manuel wake up a little. Although I'm not proud of everything America does if we had the choice of living in North Korea or the USA which would you choose? I doubt very much it would be North Korea because to start with they certainly wouldn't tolerate your outspoken e-mail...you'd probably be in a 're-education camp' by now. At least in USA we have the some basic human rights and have the freedom to discuss the jobs our politicians are doing and have the right to not re-elect them when they fail us. Can you say that much about North Korea? You say that North Korea is no threat to any other nation...what about it's own peoples? Do you care about them at all?