Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

UK shadow govt eyes reintroducing 50% tax rate for top earners

Published time: January 25, 2014 14:24
The financial district is seen in a view across the River Thames in London (Reuters / Paul Hackett)

The financial district is seen in a view across the River Thames in London (Reuters / Paul Hackett)

Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls says Labour will reintroduce the 50 percent tax rate for people earning over £150,000. This comes as part of an election vow, together with promises to balance the government's books and to clear the budget deficit.

A promise to bring back the tax on bank bonuses and reduce pension tax relief for the highest earners came in a speech to the Fabian Society Balls delivered on Saturday. However, he admitted that these measures would not be enough to balance the books.

And when the deficit is still high, when tough times are set to last well into next parliament, when for ordinary families their real incomes are falling and taxes have risen, it cannot be right for David Cameron and George Osborne to have chosen to give the richest people in the country a huge tax cut,” he said.

The last Labour government, under Gordon Brown, raised the upper tax band from 40% to 50% in response to the recession in 2010, but the coalition cut it back to 45% in April 2013.

Even if Labour significantly raises taxes they will still have to adopt day-to-day spending cuts across government departments similar to those being carried out by the current chancellor, George Osborne.

Both Ed Balls and the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, face a daunting task trying to persuade voters that they will be tough on government spending and that they have a decent economic plan for a sustained recovery. Balls actually promised to deliver a budget surplus by 2020.

Privately, Party strategists are concerned that voters are skeptical of Labour’s economic message.

The Conservatives have said that they plan to bring the national account into a surplus by 2018-2019 by further reducing public spending as a proportion of national income; Osborne has already highlighted the need for an additional £25 billion of cuts for 2016-2017.

Balls’s plan makes it possible for Labour to eradicate the deficit in the final year of the parliament, a year later than Osborne’s plan while differentiating itself from the Tories by introducing higher capital spending, higher taxes and fewer cuts to welfare.

“We will get the current budget into surplus as soon as possible in the next parliament. How fast we can go will depend on the state of the economy and public finances we inherit,” Mr. Balls said.

Labour is trying to appeal to middle class voters, many of whom have seen their living standards plummet since the financial crisis of 2008, followed by the sweeping cuts of the coalition.

“The current cost-of-living crisis is not just about people on tax credits, zero hour contracts and the minimum wage. It’s also about millions of middle-class families who never thought that life would be such a struggle,” said the shadow chancellor.

Comments (7)

 

Peter Jennings 27.01.2014 00:43

@mergon
They all use the "trust" system to hide away their fortunes and guarantee they are passed on through the family.

May be if death duty wasn't so draconian...

 

mergon 26.01.2014 11:24

so all that means is that even more companies use the charity angle to reduce their taxes down to next to nothing.
Take a look at just how many companies use charity status to duck the tax laws ,its astounding !

 

Peter Jennings 25.01.2014 19:44

This is all stuff and nonsense people. The labour party isn't the party it was and trust me they have no intention of forcing their schools pals to pay more tax. It is much easier to pick on the little guy as they don't have the legal schooling or the funds to protect themselves.

They can seem to be fair to the great unwashed whilst leaving plenty of loopholes for "business associates" to slip through. Other than that there's always the u-turn and the old adage that it will hurt Britain. How many times have we heard that one of the centuries?

View all comments (7)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us