Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

P5+1 eases nuclear demands on Iran, offers sanctions relief

Published time: February 28, 2013 03:15
Top officials from the United States, France, Germany, Britain, China, Russia and Iran take part in talks on Iran's nuclear programme in the Kazakh city of Almaty on February 27, 2013 (AFP Photo / Pool / Shamil Zhumatov)

Negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 nations ended with offers of eased demands on the Islamic Republic. While it's a good start, experts say, the crippling US sanctions on the country are unlikely to be changed as they are written into American law.

A new proposal finalized during the Wednesday meeting in Almaty, Kazakhstan would require Iran to suspend - but not completely close down - operations at its underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. It would also create a set amount of 20-per-cent-enriched uranium for Iran to stockpile.

The offer marks a new turn in the long term of negotiations between world powers and Iran, which previously had made stark demands on the Islamic Republic. The P5+1 - the United States, Russia, France, Britain, China and Germany - are now only asking for scaled down operations in Iran's nuclear program, which some governments allege is aimed at developing a nuclear bomb.

Iran would also now be able to keep enough enriched uranium to produce medical isotopes at a research facility in Tehran.

The group asked Iran to allow International Atomic Energy Agency monitors to visit its facilities more often in exchange for the suspension of selected current sanctions and a moratorium on new ones.

However, Hillary Mann Leverett, CEO of Strategic Energy and Global Analysis, a Washington-based political risk consultancy, told RT this part may be only an empty gesture.

"Everyone knows the United States has very little that it can give on sanctions," she said. "President Obama essentially ceded his foreign policy on this issue to the US Congress; almost all of those sanctions are written into US law. They are not something President Obama can give away."

In any case, the European Union's embargo on Iranian oil was not brought up for negotiation at the meeting, though the P5+1 would reportedly consider easing restrictions on Iran's gold and petrochemicals trades, as well as those on its banks.

But, after all, it may not matter in the long run, Mann Leverett told RT. "There's not much the US can give on sanctions, and in the meantime Iran is becoming more and more self-sufficient in a range of issues so that it's not vulnerable to such sanctions."

Said Jalili, Iran's chief negotiator at the meetings, called the talks "positive" in comments to the press in Almaty. He added that some of the offers coming from Western governments looked “more realistic than those presented in the past and made an effort to approach the positions of Iran.”

Mann Leverett explained what Jalili might have been getting at: "The critical issue for the Iranians, and I think this is where they perceived a slight - and I stress slight - movement on the US side, is in the recognition of their rights: their sovereign and their treaty-based rights to enrich uranium."

Jalili stressed that Tehran saw "no justification" for shutting down the Fordo facility.

Next, Iranian and EU officials are set to meet in Istanbul on March 18 for negotations that will include experts on nuclear technology.

Comments (19)

Julius Lehtinen 28.02.2013 17:49

Are USA and Israel internationally isolated? No, they are not. Regardless of their unlawful actions and continuous violations of intl. law they still can trade with anyone they want, they are not been suffocated by US led sanctions.
So basically with your logic, USA and Israeli should be internationally isolated (they really should be).

And what comes to this P5+1 proposal, it is no use. It is just first declaring sanctions, and then offering to take part of them away if you will jump when USA tells you to. Doesn't seem fair to me, not at all.

0

Undo

Julius Lehtinen 28.02.2013 17:45

"And Iran wonders why they are internationally isolated.. Maybe because the don't listen to the P5+1?"

Lets sum up a bit. Does USA listen and obey UN resolutions? For example UN voted 180-4 against USA's Cuba-embargo, no difference made in US policy.

Does Israel listen and obey UN resolutions? For example UN condemned strictly the settlements on Palestine as a violation of international law. No difference made in Israeli policy.

0

Undo

Anonymous user 28.02.2013 13:52

And Iran wonders why they are internationally isolated.. Maybe because the don't listen to the P5+1?

0

Undo

View all comments (19)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us