RT correspondent injured in Damascus crossfire

Published time: January 04, 2013 03:28
Edited time: January 04, 2013 07:46
RT correspondent injured in Damascus crossfire
Download video (47.92 MB)
Embed

A group of international journalists – including members of RT's Arabic team – have been caught in crossfire in Syria while covering the army's operations outside the capital. RT’s correspondent suffered light injuries while trying to escape.

­Syrian government forces have been trying to clear the area of rebels occupying the Damascus suburb of Daraya. Several international journalists, including Russians, Iraninans and Syrians, joined the group to report on the early morning operation and found themselves caught in heavy gunfire.

“We were moving from street to street, and when we reached the dock, my colleagues and I got caught in crossfire,” RT Arabic correspondent Kamel Saqer explained.

“We tried to escape, running one after another fearing that armed rebels would notice us. A Syrian army soldier accompanied us the entire time – he constantly kept his eye on the situation and helped us to escape the gunfire.”

It was unclear whether the rebels were deliberately targeting journalists, all of whom were wearing bulletproof vests with clearly visible word 'press' on them, Saqer said.

The firing was very intense and it was difficult to find shelter, Saqer added. “I ran and fell down, I hurt my arms – but the Syrian army doctors gave me first aid on the scene. So I could continue to do my job.”

One of the Syrian cameramen was also slightly wounded.


­‘There’s no way to be safe in wartime’

According to recent studies, Syria was the most dangerous country for journalists in 2012, with over 50 correspondents killed while covering the conflict.

“The reality is there is no way to be safe in wartime,” an award-winning war correspondent Russ Baker told RT. “It is just inherently dangerous.”

A member of the Syrian Opposition Coalition previously said that Russians in Syria have become legitimate targets, claiming they are “cooperating with enemy forces”

And Baker believes that the very fact that most journalists are perceived as somewhat biased increases the danger to them during the wartime.

“The reality is that very few news organizations are seen as truly objective or open minded. And I suppose that just as people from RT may be seen as in some ways skeptical of the rebels, American journalists are going to face the opposite kind of thing.”

“Unfortunately I now consider a lot of combat coverage to be sort of in the realm of entertainment,” he added. “And what I mean by that is that it doesn’t really provide people with any kind of great insight into what really is going on.”

Many international journalists are reported missing or have been detained in Syria, one of them is Ukrainian Anhar Kochneva who is being held captive by the Free Syrian Army.

Generally there is no condemnation of such cases from the world powers which back the opposition, and Baker believes that is because such incidents do not fit the reality they are trying to present.

“This is a general problem that all journalists have to be treated alike and we’ve got to have some kind of standardization of the criteria. But war is a game of propaganda and unfortunately there is very little context to any of this.”

Comments (33)

I think there's a war in syria (unregistered) 04.01.2013 22:57

That'll happen where people are trying to kill each other with bullets and bombs.

0

Undo

Captain Obvious (unregistered) 04.01.2013 21:31

Frankly, Assad can not win.  You know.  I know it.  Putin, Lavrov, and RT know it.  Baath are outnumbered 10 to 1.  2/3 of the army has defected to opposition side and they have captured enough weapons to sustain a long grueling campaign.  With each new day, more and more caskets will be shipped back to latakia until they run out of men to fight.

You should drop the foreign terrorist, NATO conspiracy.  Once the tide is fully turned those exact same arguments can be turned 180 degrees and used to justify wholesale killing of baath supporters.  It is a bad argument that serves no purpose other than getting more people killed.  I thought it would be obvious from my post mocking renae.  I apologize for assumming you had intelligence enough to reason it out.  So let me be blunt.  If you argue that you are killing foreign terrorists but it turns out they are syrians, then they can turn around and argue they are killing iranian collaborators.  It is an argument that promotes more violence without changing the ending.  Assad is finished.  The best thing for Syria is to get this war over and start rebuilding.  The best way to do that is for the christian and alawi to throw assad under the bus and scapegoat wealthy baath.  The longer they take to do it then the more coffins they get in tartous - for nothing.  the end result will still be same.

0

Undo

M (unregistered) 04.01.2013 20:49

Captain Obvious (unregistered) wrote in #8
Bashar claims to be protecting Syria from terrorists. In the last two years bashar has killed 60,000 syrians. In the last 40 years every terrorist in the world combined has killed less than 10,000 - including the 9-11 attack against USA and the 2009 attack in beslan. I don't think dead people care who killed them.  As such, the baath regime is worse than every terrorist organization in the world - combined!  Not just worse.  6x worse. ---------- -
Why don't you tell us how many were killed in the wars instigated by US/NATO. In Iraq alone at least 100,000 were killed. You can also add Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Vietnam, and many others, anybody could easily google the list of US military operations. So we'll find that US and NATO are killing a lot more people, and even if your stats were correct, it's nothing compared to the number of people killed by US, so you've chosen really bad argument.

By the way, according to the official stats in 2010-2011 about 5,000,000 died in US. And I have no doubts that your statistics on Syria from SOHR or any other rebel propaganda source intentionally include not only all the deaths caused by the so-called rebels, but absolutely all deaths in Syria, so why don't you use the same logic to say that Obama kills 2,500,000 US citizens every year...

+1

Undo

View all comments (33)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us