Resolution resistance: West rejects Russia's Syria draft

Published time: January 17, 2012 07:39
Edited time: January 17, 2012 21:02
UN Security Council members vote on a resolution calling for an immediate halt to the crackdown in Syria against opponents of the government of President Bashar al-Assad, at the United Nations headquarters in New York. AFP PHOTO / UN PHOTO / Eskinder Debebe
Download video (70.22 MB)
Embed

Western diplomats pushing for tough action against Damascus have criticized Russia’s new draft UN resolution for being too conciliatory. But while experts argue over drafts and texts, innocent Syrians are living in constant fear for their lives.

­After weeks of criticism over the slow pace of talks, Russia has submitted a new draft UN resolution designed to bring peace to Syria, which calls on all sides to halt the violence.

However the draft has come in for harsh criticism from council members, who say it does not condemn President Assad’s crackdown on protesters strongly enough. They say it also does not make clear whether Moscow would accept tough sanctions which the West believes will solve the conflict and save innocent civilians.

The new text enlarges on an existing Russian resolution, which has been supplemented with a list of amendments proposed by the European nations and the United States.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday that it does not support any foreign military deployment in Syria, as this would not bring any positive results. Moscow says that the conflict should be solved by Syrians themselves without any outside force. Russia, which holds both Syrian authorities and the opposition responsible, is calling for both sides to negotiate and find a peaceful solution to the crisis.

Council members are to discuss Russia’s text on Tuesday.

As the new draft resolution was being distributed, Germany again raised its voice in the 15-member Security Council over the lack of UN action on the worsening crisis.

Russia's previous draft, presented to the UN on December 23, was criticized for being “insufficient.”

Britain, France, Germany and the United States said the text was not acceptable because it put opposition violence on a par with the government assault which the UN says has left more than 5,400 dead.

­Ali Rizk, an expert on Middle Eastern affairs told RT that one cannot consider the Syrian case “regardless or separate from the whole bigger regional package.” Rizk believes that the US and its allies view Syria as a very important “card” in their confrontation with Iran.

“The chances of any fruitful resolve, any solution would be that the US finds common ground with Iran,” he said. “Once the US is able to reach its solution when it comes to Iran then I think we will see the US being more responsive to the Russian proposals to solve this Syrian issue.”

­Political science professor Eugene Dabbous believes that in order to begin real negotiations, the West should recognize the current Syrian regime as a partner that will remain in power for the foreseeable future. At the same time, Dabbous says, Assad deal with the opposition as an equal partner.

Dabbous told RT that the Syrian leadership is "very well prepared" for the uprising in the country. “Their power structures are intact. It’s crumbling on the edges slightly, but from a pure power perspective Syria’s regime is not threatened.”


RT’s Sara Firth, who has been following the situation in Syria closely, is in the conflict-torn city of Homs, where the situation has become even more dangerous.   

The tragic death of French journalist Gille Jaquier in Homs served as yet another reminder of the harrowingly precarious situation facing the residents of this city.

The armed conflict in Syria is now looking increasingly like a civil war. Towns and cities like Homs, whose populations have resisted the government crackdown, resemble a war zone. Thousands of people have fled the city. This is the devastating reality of Syria’s uprising, with neither the government nor the opposition seemingly willing to lay down their arms and pursue dialogue.

Watch RT's Sara Firth report from Homs


Comments (26)

bert 19.01.2012 13:42

John Ellis wrote in #18
Everyone evil --- So we bomb to overcome evil      And if what bert claims is true, “Every nation is selfish,” then for no other reason then to maximize a selfish economy would Russia strive for an end to all violence and the peaceful stability needed to expand into new markets. Whereas, in order for Empire USA to maximize a selfish economy, brutal imperialism and plunder of weaker nations being what an empire is all about, only by bigger wars and greater violence could this be achieved.
You are exaggerating.

Russia striving for peace and the USA for war, both for gaining prosperity for their people?
You can of course accuse the USA of being imperialistic, but when you look to the facts as they have been unfolding throughout the years then you can't deny that Russia has had a official policy of so called Russification, what's causing a lot of tension in former republics which became indepent states, and that China is doing the same thing.
I guess you don't want to hear that but that's more near the truth.
About imperialism. The one who is doing that at this moment by far the most is China. China is buying land in both Argentine and Ethiopia to feed its own population. At the same time the water resources within China are drying up because of their policy. Ask the Chinese farmers.
And you porbably don't want to hear is but what is Russia doing on the North Pole? Claiming rights to mine commodities. That looks to me as imperialism.
War is the most ugly invention of mankind. Every war has only losers.

0

Undo

Ray O Hope 18.01.2012 04:39

Answer wrote in #4
Islam why don't you look at you're bloody hands, and fangs I may ad, you bloody zionist thugs, go back in time to all of you're so called GREAT WARS, and say it again WHO IS THE BLOODEST OF ALL.

+2

Undo

Answer 18.01.2012 00:21

Islam

0

Undo

View all comments (26)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us