Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Switzerland votes a narrow 'yes' to cap EU immigration

Published time: February 09, 2014 04:08
Edited time: February 11, 2014 11:23

Two electoral posters against (L) and in favor (R) of a "Stop Mass Immigration" referendum (AFP Photo / Fabrice Coffrini)

Download video (16.08 MB)

Switzerland has voted 50.3 percent in favor of limiting annual migration from the EU, thus ending the policy of free movement within the bloc that was established in 2002.

Swiss voters narrowly decided that immigration quotas would be reintroduced, thereby overturning the free movement policy introduced in the European Union 12 years ago. Early results showed the country to be very divided in opinion over the 'Stop mass immigration’ initiative.

‘Stop mass immigration’ was introduced by the nationalist Swiss People's Party (SVP). Its goal is to introduce annual quotas on the number of foreign workers entering the country. The result will likely vex multinational companies based there; Roche, Novartis, UBS, and other industry giants frequently utilize foreign labor.

Before Sunday's results were fully confirmed, it appeared that Swiss voters were completely divided over the issue, with early projections gauged from partial results and estimates showing a 50-50 split (with a three percent margin of error). Ten out of 26 cantons - state districts - and half-cantons had voted in favor of the initiative.

Public opinion institute Gfs.bern stated at first that the outcome seemed too close to call. However, it emerged by Sunday evening that more than half of Swiss cantons supported the move, according to Reuters.

Many in Switzerland - which is surrounded by the EU but is not a member - believe that rising immigration levels are putting pressure on infrastructure, rent prices, the social security system, and unemployment rates.

The SVP party has been campaigning for the amendment, saying that immigrants are destroying the nation’s Alpine identity and taking away skilled jobs.

"Many people feel this is challenging their identity, even if there isn't any concrete economic impact on a personal level,” Georg Lutz, professor of political science at the University of Lausanne Georg, told Reuters.

"I don't want to live like a sardine in a tin can," independent politician Thomas Minder, who supports the initiative, told tabloid newspaper Blick.

A man walks past posters of the Swiss People's Party (SVP) promoting the initiative to expel foreigners, in Lausanne, November 28, 2010. The posters read 'Ivan S., rapist and soon to be Swiss ?' and 'Yes to the initiative to expel foreigners'. (Reuters / Valentin Flauraud)

According to the latest data, 23 percent of the country’s eight million inhabitants are foreigners – the second largest proportion in Europe after Luxembourg.

Many fear the initiative would have a negative impact on the economy, which relies on foreign workers for progress and a competitive edge.

Italians and Germans reportedly comprise the largest contingent of immigrants to Switzerland, most of whom seek work in IT, healthcare, and financial sectors.

Severin Schwan, Austrian CEO of Roche Pharmaceuticals, said about half of the employees at the research and development site in Basel, Switzerland are foreigners.

Hans Hess, head of Swissmem - a leader in electrical and mechanical engineering - believes that Switzerland’s economy is successful because of innovation, which requires a steady stream of qualified immigrants.

"Innovation is the driver of the Swiss economy. That's why we need highly qualified workers inside Switzerland and from abroad," Hess said.

Indeed, four in every ten new companies were founded by foreigners, according to Orell Fuessli Wirtschaftsinformationen AG. Those new companies also created 30,000 jobs in 2013.

Other than a skilled workforce, immigrants benefit the economy through consumer spending. Credit Suisse reported that about 25 percent of private consumption growth since 2008 was thanks to foreigners.

The constitutional amendment could potentially erode Switzerland’s relationship with the EU, which views the freedom of movement policy as a fundamental right.

Marine Le Pen, head of France's far-right party, French National, tweeted her support for the outcome. "Switzerland says no to immigration of the masses, bravo! The European Union will be sending the tanks?..."

Comments (56)


Margaret Walsh 03.03.2014 05:15

All countries should carefully monitor their immigration. Preference should always be given to the local citizens for work, education, housing, health and any social economic benefits. If there be a specialized field, that could be filled by a relevant migrant worker, maybe a case by case assessment should operate. Above all, migrants to any country should only be accepted, if they are compatible with the lifestyle of the host country. No migrant should arrive expecting the host country to change or amend laws to suit them, their beliefs or social mores. Basically, desire to fit in, or don't come at all.


Paul Vonharnish 17.02.2014 15:03

The NATO/EU banking thugs apparently have no clue about the terms or conditions of sovereignty. The EU is a group of bank and trading cartels intent on world domination, and are so mentally impaired they don't know the game is coming apart with or without their consent. All sovereign nations need to take back their power from these Zion pigs and destroy the embassies that support them. The United States should have closed it's boarders seventy-five years ago. Instead we've been bankrupted by a private cartel of international extortionists and war mongers. Ban the NATO/EU system or burn with it.


Wilfried Unzufried 16.02.2014 21:23

We are a small country with 7'000'000 people, and since the border with the EU is open wide, we have 80'000 people immigrating each year, they all need jobs, housing, schooling. We cannot build up infrastructure fast enough, it's simply too much. It is better to define a yearly allowed number of immigrant suited to our real capacity to welcome our foreign friends.
Why do so many people have a problem accepting when a country tries to correct policies that prove themselves wrong? Why is it a taboo to correct mistakes?
Take this: imagine, try, observe, learn, analyse, improve. That is our way of running a country.

View all comments (56)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us