Breaking news

French soldier on duty stabbed by man 'of North African origin' in Paris

Aleppo blame game: Conflicting reports from the ground in Syria

Published time: July 28, 2012 14:44
Edited time: July 29, 2012 05:38
Syrian opposition fighters battle government security forces (unseen) during the siege of the Shaar district police station in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo (AFP Photo / Pierre Torres)

Syria’s main commercial hub, Aleppo, was rocked with violent clashes overnight, but there are conflicting reports as to who was responsible for the fighting. Mainstream media is siding with the rebels, while witnesses say the rebels are to blame.

­Mainstream media outlets report the Syrian regime is gearing for a “massacre,” as it launches deadly ground and air attacks on rebels.

According to AP, military helicopters pounded the city early Saturday morning, in an effort to clear the area of anti-Assad forces once and for all.

"Helicopters are participating in clashes at the entrance of Salaheddine district and bombarding it. There are also violent clashes at the entrances to Sakhour district," the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights told Reuters.

But others say the clashes began after rebels attacked government buildings in the area.

Sarkis Kassargian, a reporter for Al-Khabar TV, told RT, “Last night, rebels attacked government buildings and police and intelligence centers in Aleppo. But they didn’t succeed to control any of those places. Attacks and clashes then occurred, but the Syrian army was acting in defense.”

Three rebel fighters were killed in the fighting on Saturday, and 160 were killed on Friday, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

But Kassargian says those deaths were due to the rebels’ own actions.  “Any deaths that took place would have been a result of the rebels’ attacking government buildings in the region,” he says.

It is a far cry from mainstream media reports, which say government troops attacked rebel forces without provocation.

He says rebel forces have now taken control of the neighborhoods of Al Hadi and Al Saher.

While mainstream media reports that residents of Aleppo are fleeing the city in droves, RT’s source maintains this is not the case.

“Right now, there is no movement from government forces. Some families and residents in Aleppo are leaving the city, but most people are just moving to safer areas within the area, such as a local school and university. The Red Cross is standing by to help those seeking shelter,” Kassargian said.

Meanwhile, the head of the main Syrian opposition group has urged the international community to take action on Syria outside the UN Security Council as fighting between government and rebel forces continues in the flashpoint city of Aleppo.

"Our friends and allies will bear responsibility for what is happening in Aleppo if they do not move soon," Abdelbasset Sida, the Syrian National Council chief, told a news conference early on Sunday, Reuters reports. "Any action has to be from outside the Security Council through an Arab League initiative and through a resolution passed by the General Assembly," he said.

Previous resolutions on Syria have been vetoed by permanent Security Council members Russia and China.

Aleppo is seen as a key city in the rebels’ fight against Assad’s forces. The city is Syria’s economic hub, and both sides feel they need it to win the fight. All eyes are seemingly on Aleppo, as rebels and forces loyal to Assad struggle to gain the upper hand.

Aleppo sits on the border with Turkey – a country which has shown recent support for Syrian rebels. With the help of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, Ankara recently set up a secret anti-Assad base in Adana, 100km from the border.

The base devises tactics and supplies weapons for the uprising, according to Reuters.

But Turkey is not the only country taking an interest in the fight against Bashar al-Assad, which concerns the Kremlin.

Russia has warned of a “tragedy” in Aleppo, saying international support for the rebels would lead to “more blood.”

During a statement at a news conference, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the Syrian government could not be expected to stand by while rebel forces occupy Aleppo and other areas throughout the country.

“Our Western partners, together with some of Syria's neighbors, are essentially encouraging, supporting and directing an armed struggle against the regime,” said Lavrov.

Several Western countries have supplied the Syrian rebels with communication devices which have served to boost the rebel forces’ fighting power, says security analyst Charles Shoebridge.

“There has been an enormous increase in the capabilities of the armed opposition and it’s down to issues like organization – which depends on communication. The Syrian government is responding in a way that any government would do if faced with a situation of urban warfare,” Shoebridge told RT.

Comments (76)

Captain Obvious (unregistered) 29.07.2012 13:42

tricky wrote in #9
What have you to say of the cold blooded massacres at knife point of women and children that refused to support the terrorists 'rebels' in Houla, Homs, Hama?
************ ******************** **I am not some dumb person who gets confused by baath propaganda.  I have seen and heard too much of it to be fooled by their tricks.  I aklso know that people who blindly repeat it fall into two categories.  The followers of hypocrites who have seen the truth but choose to follow anyway.  This is exceptionally common with HA supporters.  And the sheep who grew up as children being told it was true and never developed the reasoning skills to see otherwise.  I personally know exactly what baath will do to hold power and what civilians will do to overthrow it.  The massacres of small towns are being perpetrated by the regime utilizing shabiha.  The purpose is to ethnically clense areas near alawite and create a buffer for regime retreat in latakia.  If the massacres were by rebels then there would be some in the east and north.  Go ahead, get out a map and see where the massacres are occurring.
As regards the lie that it is a western conspiracy.  If that was true Egypt would have never fallen.  They were an important western ally controlling the suez canal and an important israel ally controlling weapons smuggling.  If arab spring was a western creation then Egypt would have been protected.  Arab spring is an arab creation and the revolution in syria is a chapter in the story of arab spring.  It will not end until assad is gone.  there are 300million arabs who want freedom and assad is now a roadblock to almost all of them.  if the rebels falter then it will just become like iraq except that the bombs and jihad will be 10x more.  the best thing for syria is if somebody just assasinates bashar and gets it over with.

0

Undo

tricky 29.07.2012 11:49

john (unregistered) wrote in #19
The LIE that, rebels--or the opportunistic West is trying to bring democracy to Arab and Islamic countries, must now be obvious.
No leader, or member of the general public in the West can explain what democracy is--or how it is supposed to work. Nor can they assert honestly that, it is being applied in any way, according to what populations want.
Like the political distortion of Christianity, democracy has become a weapon to appease the confused and subdue the critical, with such "democratic" appendages as human rights appeal and war crimes.
Syria is fighting for its integral administrative heart, in much the same way as any western government would defend theirs. Not being a democracy, does not mean that, it cannot work under another system--free of capitalistic control.
Egypt is trying to adapt to some semblance of western-style "democracy", but has to contend with western diktat and dollars from the US to pay the Egyptian Army. What chance is there here for equity and freedom to evolve, for a nation already mortgaged?
I wish the Syrian people good luck, in whatever they choose to represent them--but do ask what western democracy means and question it.
 
*** ******************** ***
Good points.

0

Undo

Captain Obvious (unregistered) 29.07.2012 11:18

There is no such thing as democracy in the West. People vote for their leaders but actually have no say in how the country is run once a candidate is in power....the state has absolute control especially on matters of foreign policy. Take the US and UK for example...both countries marched to war in Iraq ignoring public opinion, expert legal advice and opposition from many quarters....was this democracy in action? No. Both countries are also increasing surveill ance of their populations and curtailing their civil liberties....these are not characteristics of a democratic society. When the West talks of democracy in other countries it is just a smokescreen for other intentions, usually intervention of some sort. Governments that are not Western friendly are overthrown, farcical elections are held, and a new hand-picked leader is installed who will obey orders from the colonial masters in the West. We see a good example in Afghanistan with puppet Hamid Karzai who only survives because of his support from the West. He is not what the people want, he is what the West wants. That's democracy for you!

+1

Undo

View all comments (76)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us