Syria’s deputy prime minister said that neither side is strong enough to win the country’s civil war. He denied reports, however, that the government would call for a ceasefire if the proposed Geneva peace talks take place.
“Neither the armed opposition nor the regime is capable of defeating the other side. This zero balance of forces will not change for a while,” Qadri Jamil told the Guardian on Thursday.
The two-year conflict has already killed more than 100,000 people
and displaced more than one million refugees.
Jamil added that the Syrian economy has lost an estimated $100bn
during the war - the equivalent of two years of normal
On Friday, the deputy PM denied he had told the Daily Star that Damascus would call for a ceasefire in the country. Speaking with RT Arabic, Jamil said that the report was “substantially inaccurate and incorrect.”
“I didn’t speak at all about the cessation of fire by the time of the Geneva-2 conference,” he said, adding that it is not yet clear when exactly the peace talks will take place and for how long – most likely for only two or three days. “Does it make any sense to demand a cease-fire for two or three days?” he said.
It is the goals of the Geneva-2 talks that Jamil was speaking about, he said. Those include ending external interference into the conflict, which would help to “stop the infinite violence” in Syria and to launch a political process. “He [the Guardian reporter] called it a cease-fire,” Jamil noted.
Since it might be difficult to put an end to violence, “as an option” the idea of international monitors could be considered, the politician told RT Arabic. Jamil emphasized that he was voicing the proposal in a personal capacity “but not on behalf of the government.”
Jamil had told the British daily that if the armed opposition in
Syria accepts the ceasefire, it would have to be monitored
“under international observation.” He added that such
supervision could be provided by UN peacekeepers, assuming they
came from friendly or neutral countries.
Moscow and Washington say they are committed to bringing both
sides of the conflict to the negotiating table at the Geneva-2
peace conference. An earlier set of talks in Geneva broke up last
year after just one day. No Syrians attended the event.
Differences remain between Russia and the US over who should take
part in Geneva-2. The US wants the Western-backed Syrian National
Coalition (SNC) to drop its boycott of the talks and be the only
opposition delegation at the conference. The SNC is calling on
Assad to step down and previously stated that its demand is
Russia has proposed that a combined delegation of Kurds also be
present at Geneva-2.
But Jamil said that outside powers must stop trying to influence
the outcome of events in Syria. He added that the Syrian
government would be pushing to “end external intervention, a
ceasefire and the launching of a peaceful political process in a
way that the Syrian people can enjoy self-determination without
outside intervention and in a democratic way.”
Jamil is the leader of the secular People’s Will Party and co-chair of the Popular Front for Change and Liberation. He was appointed last year to end the monopoly of the ruling Ba’ath party in the Syrian government.
“We wanted to give a lesson to both sides to prepare for a government of national unity and break the unilateral aspect of the regime – and break the fear in opposition circles of sitting in front of the regime,” he said.
He added that Western countries need to step away in order for change to develop in Syria.
“For all practical purposes the regime in its previous form has ended. In order to realize our progressive reforms we need the West and all those who are involved in Syria to get off our shoulders," he said.
Ahead of the Geneva conference, French President Francois Hollande stated that he is in favor of sending weapons “in a controlled environment” to the FSA. "The Russians regularly send [weapons] but we will do it in a broader context, with a number of countries and a framework which can be controlled, because we cannot have a situation where weapons end up with Islamists," Hollande said during a press conference in the Malian capital of Bamako.
Meanwhile, Jamil said that he didn’t believe the UN’s report on the August 21 chemical attack was fully objective, citing evidence provided by Russia that the chemical weapons could have been sold to the rebels by fundamentalists from Libya. Last month’s attack is believed to have killed over 1,000 people.
Although the shell casings that allegedly contained sarin gas were Soviet-made, they were exported during the 1970s and were since loaded with chemicals by fundamentalists in Syria.
Speaking at the Valdai Club, a conference of Western politicians and Russia experts, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that although he could not be certain that the Syrian government would be able to destroy its chemical weapons within such a strict time frame, he was hopeful that it would.
“I cannot be 100 percent sure about it. But everything we have seen so far in recent days gives us confidence that this will happen…I hope so,” Putin said.