Syria holds referendum amid bloodshed

Published time: February 26, 2012 04:05
Edited time: February 27, 2012 08:33
A man holding a picture of President Bashar al-Assad and a copy of the draft proposed constitution (AFP Photo / Anwar Amro)
Download video (39.62 MB)
Embed

An unprecedented referendum on a new draft constitution has taken place in Syria despite opposition calls for the population to boycott the vote. Once adopted, the new constitution will put an end to five decades of one-party rule.

The ballots are being counted now and the authorities confidently state that Syrians have taken a very active part in the crucial vote.

According to an official representative from the Ministry of Information, there were no public order violations in Damascus.

Millions of Syrians are believed to have voted on their country’s new constitution. Posters and banners calling on people to vote were everywhere in the capital and all around the country, RT’s Maria Finoshina reports from Damascus. For the first time in the country’s history the Interior Ministry was urging people to vote without actually telling them how they should vote.

The draft of the newly proposed constitution has been made public days before the referendum takes place. Hundreds of its copies have been distributed among people to let them know what changes the new law puts forward.

The draft constitution includes 14 new and 47 amended articles.

One of the main changes is Article 8, which actually ends over 50 years of single-party rule in Syria. It proclaims that political system in Syria is based on pluralism and multiparty system is permitted.

Also very important is Article 88, as it says that president of the country could only be elected for two seven-year terms. This change however will come into power only after the next presidential elections, which is scheduled for 2014. 

There is controversy over some provisions of the draft document. For instance, the new constitution would allow only a Muslim to become president, which the non-Muslim minority is naturally not pleased with.

“What about the 10 per cent of others? We are not here temporary; we’ve been living together for ages, we want to be counted. Why [do] they keep it?” one of such disgruntled people told RT.

The people behind the draft say it was necessary, especially with the tension so high in Syria’s society. “Ten per cent unhappy is better than 90 per cent angry,” said Ahmad Kuzbari, member of constitutional committee.

Still the draft constitution meets the majority of democratic demands of the Syrians. But the big question is whether the government wins public support of the reform. Political analyst Nabil Saman told RT that many people do not trust it. “They're simply not used to it,” he explained.

According to the Interior Ministry 14,000 polling stations were set up for the referendum. About 15 million Syrians have the right to vote.

However, as Maria Finoshina reports, the referendum may come too late as violence is continuing in the country between the opposition and the authorities.

The opposition called to boycott the vote and go on strike. RT’s correspondent says warnings were circling in Damascus that there could have been attacks and explosions at the polling stations during the vote.

Meanwhile, a group of countries, led by the US, calling themselves the Friends of Syria have called for tougher sanctions on Damascus.

Political activist Shabbir Razvi believes that the Friends of Syria should be really dubbed “the Foes of Syria," because they are really not working "for the interest of Syrian people.”

“The Western powers I think would never be satisfied with any kind of change occurring in Syria or any of the other Middle Eastern countries so long as that change is not in the interest or benefit of the Western powers,” Razvi told RT. “To think that the West can ever be interested for the people of a particular country is laughable.”

­After almost one year of unrest in Syria, it has become clear that there are outside forces involved in the conflict, believes Beirut-based political analyst Omar Nashabe. “There are some foreign forces interfering in Syria, smuggling weapons into Syria, smuggling money for these groups to assault the government.

He also notes that the conference held in Tunis proves that the West is ready to remove President Assad at any cost.


­Historian and political analyst Peter Rushton told RT that the main challenge for the Syrian government right now is to assure that the referendum gets through smoothly, “without terrorist attacks to disrupt it.”

“The major problem for the government in Damascus and everybody on the ground in Syria will be allowing the process to go ahead relatively uninterrupted,” Rushton said. “The key thing will be not just the result of the referendum, but the number of people who are allowed to take part in it and thus it is being shown as a legitimate consultation of the people.”

Rushton believes that if any kind of violence takes place during the vote, the West may say: “The result is illegitimate! That may well be the reason why the bombs are going off in the first place.”


Comments (88)

bert 29.02.2012 05:24

Bianca wrote in #6
(had to wipe your words because of max. number)   I have a lot of friends whose native language is Arab. I'm not at all depedent of the Guardian. But other people probably don't have such friends who are willing to translate things I want to know.
Yes, I know quite some people, also within Syria. It has nothing to do with so called 'friends of Syria' but with ordinary people within Syria who are tired of Assad his policies, saying 'A' but doing 'B.'Someone who threatens to start a war with neighbours when it will become more and more clear that he will loose his position does not act for the interest of his people but for his own interests.Yes, Assad is running out of time. And he knows that very well. No one can stay leader of a country when so many people have been killed, partly because he gave the orders for that. He has lost his credibility. Assad knows that very well. So do Russia and China.

0

Undo

borysd (unregistered) 29.02.2012 01:21

Assad`s new constitution allows for only Muslims to become president of Syria...he just lost 13% of the population which are Christians...Assad never paid any attention to the constitution anyway....bye bye assad

+1

Undo

Bianca 27.02.2012 19:34

It looks like the "Friends of Syria" on this forum are finding it had to justify why should the support for the armed militants continue, instead of allowing people to focus on political change.  & nbsp;So, for all of you advocating "friendly"  attacks by the unidentified gunmen --- you are at the losing end of the stick.  While for the long time it was hard to penetrate what is happening in Syria, it became clearer as the time went by.  There is a serious, non-violent opposition in Syria, and they got down to business to carve out political reforms.  As imperfect as the reforms may be, they are still far reaching.  And, btw --- I would NOT use Guardian as my source of translation.  As RT has some real presence in the country, it would be usefull to give more details on the armed militants.  The "friends" would like the world to believe that armed conflicts are everywhere, while it appears that the militants are mostly contained in one of the Homs suburbs.  Before, every time Army withdrew, the militants came out to carry attacks elsewhere.  As far as I know,  planned bombings and attacks on police were the only types of attacks carried out outside Homs.  None of the fighting, as the friends of Syria would have it,  involves any confrantation between police, army and the protesting civilians.  It would be helpfull if RT could give some more information about the life in Syria.  CNN keeps on showing protesting civilians,  and some of it looks more like pictures from Tunisia then Syria.  It is also clear that the main source of militancy are Iraqi Sunni, angry at Shia dominance. The main political source of conflict is Moslem Brotherhood that is hoping to repeat success of Egypt.  Minorities have only government to protect them.  I am interested in Hamas support. It looks like they are supporting Brotherhood for political gains, not the gunmen --- as the "Friends" would have it.   

+1

Undo

View all comments (88)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us