UN Syria envoy calls for regime ceasefire amid doubts over rebels’ unity on issue

Published time: October 17, 2012 17:55
Edited time: October 18, 2012 11:26
A handout picture released by the Lebanese photo agency Dalati and Nohra shows United-Nations Envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi speaking during a joint press conference with Prime Minister Najib Mikati at the governmental palace in Beirut on October 17, 2012. (AFP Photo/Dalati & Nohra)

The UN and Arab League envoy to Syria has called on Assad’s regime to initiate a ceasefire. But while the government says it will “explore the option,” state-run media says the plan won't work due to rebels' lack of unified leadership.

Speaking in Beirut on Wednesday, Lakhdar Brahimi said if Assad’s government makes the first move, then everyone he has talked to on the opposition side will also accept the ceasefire. He said the truce would be a “microscopic” step toward ending 19 months of violence in Syria.

Brahimi has asked Iranian officials to help broker the truce later this month.

The Syrian foreign ministry says it is looking forward to talks with Brahimi, but stressed the rebels and their backers would also need to be involved.

“The Syrian side is interested in exploring this option and we are looking forward to talking to Mr Brahimi to see what is the position of other influential countries that he talked to in his tour,” foreign ministry spokesman Jihad Maqdisi told AFP. “In order to succeed in any initiative, it takes two sides,” he continued.

But Syria’s state-run Al-Thawra state-run newspaper was less optimistic about Brahimi’s plan, saying the biggest obstacle to a truce was the lack of an authority to sign for the rebels.

"There is the state, represented by the government and the army on one front, but who is on the other front?" the paper asked in an editorial on Wednesday.

The country’s main opposition group – the Syrian National Council (SNC) – has backed Brahimi’s request. However, the SNC has previously been accused of failing to unite the opposition within Syria – leading many to criticize the ceasefire’s potential for success.

The SNC is led mostly by Western-educated academics, so bridging the gap between the party’s figureheads and the rebel soldiers fighting the war is a task easier said than done – because not all opposition members belong to the SNC.

The country’s many opposition groups vary in several ways, both principally and geographically. Several groups are holding out hope for a peaceful overthrow of Assad, while others are continuing the armed fight.

The SNC, which is based abroad in Istanbul, consists of seven opposition groups focused on toppling Assad. It began working side by side with the Free Syrian Army (FSA) in January 2012.

The FSA operates inside Syria, and is the country’s main armed opposition group. It is composed of both former members of the Syrian Armed Forces and anti-regime volunteers.

The National Coordination Body for Democratic Change in Syria (NCB) is yet another group focused on ousting Assad – but the party has been shunned by the FSA and failed to reach any kind of agreement with the SNC.

Last month, a meeting led by the NCB in Damascus called for the “peaceful overthrow” of Assad. The FSA boycotted the forum, accusing the NCB of not representing the true opposition and accusing them of being “only another face of the Syrian regime.”

In March, a meeting between various opposition groups in Istanbul ended in walkouts and disagreement, with several smaller groups accusing the SNC of assuming too much power in the uprising against Assad.

With so many opposition groups fighting against the regime in different ways, getting everyone to agree to a single ceasefire seems to be a very hard task.

Even if rebels did find a way to organize themselves under a central command, the country’s growing number of foreign jihadists would probably remain out of the control of opposition groups. According to a panel appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, such fighters tend to push anti-government fighters towards more radical positions.  

It’s not the first time talks of a ceasefire have been on the table.

Earlier this year, former UN envoy to Syria Kofi Annan proposed a ceasefire as part of his six-point peace plan. The plan was broken, and Annan began yet another plea for peace in the nation.

Brahimi’s statements came during a regional tour aimed at ending the Syrian conflict. His trip has included stops in Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Iraq. He is expected to arrive in the Syrian capital of Damascus on Wednesday.

Russia hopes Brahimi will also make time for a visit to Moscow later this month.

A statement from the Russian foreign ministry said that the country supports finding the quickest way to resolve the conflict through political means.

“As far as we know, Lakhdar Brahimi is holding meetings with all sides in Syria, as well as forces outside Syria, to formulate a clear concept for resolving the conflict. We await his arrival in Moscow to share our thoughts and ideas on the matter,” the statement said.

Comments (13)

johnk 18.10.2012 21:06

I think any true Syrian will be against this ceasefire. The reason is no Syrian wants these terrorists to regroup and to come back with more weapons from Turkey. Syrians want these NATO rats dead, wiped off the map, never to come back again. 

+2

Undo

Captain Obvious (unregistered) 18.10.2012 11:55

Big-one5 (unregistered) wrote in #11
In other words.. Please Mr Assad cease fire, because the opposition is in disarray and cannot topple you this way. They need weapons , munitions, more stinger rockets, and more Russian weapons . Why Russian weapons? Because if you don't want to learn how to use them, you already know. They can work maintenance free , under any condition. They are inaccurate, but if you shoulder them they work. After that the peaceful opposition expect a day for you to step down. Or by then they will be ready for the next 18 month until a new truce is reached. The U.N will give a lot of humanitarian aid, to the rebels. I wonder why not give the aid to the legitimate Syrian government. That would underpower the terrorist cells and give peace until new elections take place.
****** ******************** *****actually, the people backing the rebels have said they won't ship any weapons until there is a unified and accountable leadership.  The rebels have russian weapons because those are the ones they can steal or buy from Assad's aresenals.  Ammunition is always in short supply and they are running out of well stocked bases to capture. 
In response to foreign demands, the largest rebel groups held a meeting and formed a joint leadership early this week.  This included the founder of FSA as well as its too largest groups spanning from homs to dier zur and north to the border.  The war critics, who analyze the meaning of things, noted that rebel attacks this week show definite signs of planned coordination.  Previously, the rebel attacks were more like random mobs with pitchforks attacking whatever was handy at the start of every day.In short, the effectiveness of rebel fighting forces may double or triple within next 30 days.

0

Undo

Celebrate Kill A Kike Week! (unregistered) 18.10.2012 11:45

Celebrate Kill A Kyke (unregistered) wrote in #10
arab s killing arabs..let the stupid arabs sort this out themselves Better yet how about we let the Arabs sort out the kykes? That would be a war we could get behind. Not much of a war and more of a demolition but so much fun.

Now RT you should know better than to use your online ways to troll your audience. How did you beat the censor for that fantastic 'k' word? Dont' bother with an obvious answer. Kykes areso very stupid and petty. Entertaining as RT pretends they aren't traitors to Russia. Don't think Putin or any real Russian leader is like those kyke puppets in the zionist world either. The pet monkeys kept by the monkeys themselves.

Nice to always see a jew shriek and moan as it obviously gets to it. The comments have left a mark like leaving a tattoo serial number on you.Who did you think it was going to convince?
Kill A kyke Week would be great for all. It would be a demolition asthe Arabs do to the kykes what they know best. Mass genocide of the most despised inbred sect anyone has know.
The Obvious schill neatly commenting as he still pretends he isn't a filthy kyke.This week it's threaten Assad the next it will be beg him again.Truely pathetic and so predictable.
If you could have attacked Syria you would have. Syria is a lot stronger than the other countries so this was your best plan. Face it kykes it's the chambers for you as it won't work No one will miss you including those you pretend are your friends.

0

Undo

View all comments (13)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us