Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

UN Security Council has no authority to support revolution in Syria – Lavrov

Published time: September 01, 2012 06:51
Edited time: September 01, 2012 17:03

The UN Security Council has no right to support a revolution or foreign intervention in Syria, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned. Any plan to withdraw government troops while fighting continues is untenable, and naïve at best, he added.

­The demand for President Bashar al-Assad to resign as a precondition to resolving the Syrian crisis is a completely unrealistic approach, Lavrov said during a public appearance at the Moscow State University of Foreign Affairs.

“There are different attitudes towards the Syrian regime. But while fighting in the streets continues, it is absolutely unrealistic to say that the only way out is for one side to unilaterally capitulate. It is not a matter of ideology, we don’t support any political figures in Syria. We just reason from what is realistic,” Lavrov said to the students of the diplomatic university.

Harking back to the summit in Geneva in June, Lavrov noted that despite differing opinions on the conflict, all the participating countries agreed to work for a “free, stable, independent and democratic” Syria. However, “our western partners and some nations in the region are almost openly pushing for outside intervention,” said Lavrov.

“Outside intervention should be positive. Every international player should push for both sides of the Syrian conflict to cease violence,” stressed Lavrov. “Saying that the government should be the first to pull out its troops from towns and then the opposition is not a viable plan.”

The Russian foreign minister added that those foreign players who insist on inciting the opposition forces “are not working in the interests of the Syrian people. They are motivated by their own geopolitical interests.”

­Lavrov cited the fact the Security Council dismissed a vote on the Geneva accord as evidence that a number of countries were not working for the Syrian people.

Ecuador, Assange’s rights must be respected

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s rights as a political refugee must be respected, Lavrov said, adding that under international law, it would be illegal for UK police to storm the Ecuadorian embassy.

“As long as he is inside Ecuadorian territory, I think no one will try any rash actions, and the rights of the refugee [Assange] must be respected. No one can challenge the judicial process. But when the Ecuadorian embassy is threatened with being stormed, just like the Winter Palace was, I think it’s a little outside the rule of law,” Lavrov said in his talk to the students, alluding to the Bolshevik storming of the Winter Palace during Russia's 1917 revolution.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been holed up inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London since June. The whistleblower is currently in the center of an international stalemate insofar as Ecuador has granted him asylum but the UK has pledged to arrest him if he sets foot outside the building.

Assange estimates that he could potentially get out of the Ecuadorian embassy in a year’s time if Sweden drops the extradition order against him. The 41-year-old Australian is wanted for questioning over charges of sexual assault and rape in Sweden.

Assange has said that if Sweden drops the extradition order against him he could potentially leave the embassy in a year’s time. The 41-year-old Australian is wanted for questioning over charges of sexual assault and rape in Sweden.

Commenting on the WikLeaks whistleblowing scandal that precipitated Assange’s asylum request, Lavrov said that the information in the WikiLeaks cables “brought to light how governments relate to their partners, and what they think of them.” The document dump hadn’t harmed or threatened the safety of any particular government, he said.

“It was curious,” Lavrov said. “But nothing more. Many of our impressions were simply confirmed.”

Comments (82)

Harry (unregistered) 09.09.2012 00:13

To Bianca, all well for your explanation. The issue is not condom. It is English speaking nations supremacy across the Atlantic is at stake. Bilderberg group created UN, and Euro zone. Russia and China in UNSC have performed poorly because they have yet to learn how to manipulate interven tionist nature of Anglos Saxons under the banner of National Security. USA & its NATO allies have expertly established connection between condom, Julian Assange and Wikileak as threat to their national security and sovereignty! Moral of story is that one should know better if he does not wear a condom! Welcoming party at Guantanamo Bay.

0

Undo

Bianca 03.09.2012 18:27

I have to say that I am bothered by the innacuracies in the article -- the innacuracies that are vital.   Assange has not been charged with ANYTHING.   He has not been accused of rape or sexual assault.  The presumed victim, that never claimed anything other then having a consentual sex with Assange,  has told a friend about a broken condom, and the story travelled to press.   In Sweden,  unprotected sex can be treated as endangerment of women's health.   But in Sweden,  charging anyone with such endangerement is predicated on sexual assault, and nobody can be charged unde this law in cases of consensual relationship.   S wedish prosecutor has INVERTED the law.  So, instead of an assault being the leading charge, resulting in a charge of unprotected sex and endangerment of women's health -- it has been reversed!  So, if condom broke and the result is an unprotected sex,  hence this must be defined as -- assault!  This is as blatant case of a corruption of  justice system, and an attempt to criminalize anything for the sake of politically motivated extradition.  To my knowledge, the woman has left Sweden to avoid being pressured into making ANYstatements that could be construed as her accusation.     I wonder why media is so quick to REPEAT the "charge", when in fact, no charges exists.  It is this HABIT of repeating ad nauseum what has been printed in Western press that allows such sloppiness. But it is not an accident that such words as "rape" and "sexual assault" are banded about.   They are to tarnish the image of a person that hurt the imperial ego more then anything else.   Just because Sweden, UK and to an extent, Australia, have conspired to put in handcuffs a man who was never charged with any crime in any country -- does it mean that media must give credence to their "charges" of rape and assault, but repeating this "charge" ad nauseum, without IN THE SAME SENTENCE stating that no compaint has ever been made, and no charges filed against Assange in Sweden.  

0

Undo

3rdbasegeorge (unregistered) 02.09.2012 04:55

@Cossack how is it that everyone expects Russia to be the most radical and assertive nation when you peasant fools can't even see the revolutionary reality of the two tier flat tax rate while whining about the banksters that pump your bottom?

0

Undo

View all comments (82)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us