Turkey’s backing of Syrian rebels leads to danger of Kurdish autonomy

Published time: August 07, 2012 23:28
Edited time: October 12, 2012 16:44
Syrian Kurds hold their rifles, as they flash the sign for victory, in the Kurdish town of Jinderes, near the northern Syrian city of Aleppo, on July 22, 2012 (AFP Photo / Bulent Kilic)
Download video (40.55 MB)
Embed

When it comes to Turkey’s policy towards Syria, Ankara might be cutting off its nose to spite its face. As Turkey pushes for Assad’s ouster, chaos on its southern border has seen the possibility of a Kurdish-controlled region grow by the day.

Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s “zero problems policy” to build strong economic, political and social ties with the country’s neighbors was almost an invitation for disaster.

Once the country moved to provide political support – and reportedly covert aid – to the Syrian opposition that is seeking regime change in Damascus, the blowback was almost immediate.

With millions of ethnic Kurds in Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran, destabilization in northern Syria has provided another base for the PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) to launch military operations against Turkey in its struggle to establish an autonomous Kurdish state.

The situation rapidly escalated, with clashes between the Turkish military and PKK fighters intensifying in recent weeks.

Turkey’s prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, vowed that Turkey would “not allow a terrorist group to establish camps in northern Syria and threaten Turkey" during a July 26 news conference. He further implied potential cross border incursions into Syria, saying "if there is a step which needs to be taken against the terrorist group, we will definitely take this step."

Sinan Ulgen, a former Turkish diplomat now at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Brussels, told Reuters that Turkey could “carry out the kind of surgical strikes that it did in northern Iraq in past years if the government has intelligence that northern Syria is being used by Kurdish terrorists.”

But Gokhan Bacik, an editor of the Turkey-based newspaper Today's Zaman, believes Ankara's calls for regime change in Syria will not serve as a solution for the Kurdish problem. 

Turkey for the first time demands a regime change in the neighboring country, but this strategy is producing some counter-productive outcomes – that is, the autonomy of Kurdish groups. So Turkey is unclear of what to do with these Kurdish groups in Northern Syria. Pushing the Turkish army into Syria will not be a solution for the Kurdish problem and will not help the humanitarian crisis in Syria.”

Mark Almond, a professor of international relations at Bilkent University in Turkey, told RT that Ankara’s position was riddled with contradictions.

It [Ankara] wants to see the overthrow of Assad’s government, it is supporting the destabilization of that regime, but it seems to expect that the mosaic of Syrian society, its ethnic make-up, will remain stable. When you shake the kaleidoscope, you cannot be certain where the pieces will fall down.”

Almond says that despite Turkey’s antagonistic relationship with Syria, Ankara cannot have its cake and eat it too when it comes to toppling the Assad government and maintaining regional stability.

We’ve seen television pictures of places in northern Syria where people are waving pictures of Ocalan, the leader of the PKK, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, who of course is held in regard as the arch anti-Turkish terrorist. And so the Turkish government does face the problem that so long as it had good relations with Bashar al-Assad’s regime, he kept the border closed and kept the PKK forces out of operation in Turkey. With the growing hostility between Ankara and Damascus and the fact that the Turkish and Syrian authorities have lost control of large parts of the border with Turkey, then of course the PKK can operate in Turkey and of course Assad’s regime can say we have ‘other things on our mind’ instead of trying to stop them.”

Almond says that threatening Syria with reprisals will only fuel the Kurdish rebellion, just as cracking down on Kurdish resistance does not change the fact that “now you have two quasi-autonomous areas on the Turkish border, in northern Iraq and increasingly in Syria.”

As the potential ‘Lebanonization’ of Syria will only lead to further chaos, Almond says Turkey has to make a choice.

The Turkish government seems to want to have it both ways. It wants to see the implosion of the Syrian regime, but it doesn’t want to see the collapse of public order and control of the borders. That to me seems to be a logical contradiction. And unfortunately for many Turkish soldiers, police and civilians, this contradiction is coming home to haunt them.”

Comments (40)

ReSakic 10.09.2012 02:11

AmericanInRomania (unregistered) wrote in #12Interesting article.....  The New York Times reported a little over a week ago about how Assad had given a green light to Kurdish-Syrians to make trouble for Turkey.  Interesting how the story changes when it hits RT....  Funny how anyone trusts what the Jew York paper has to say. There is always one Jew around trying to spread their lies even here on RT where there are none. Pathetic but nothing that hasn't been see before. Renaming Turkey to Kurdey would be a very welcomed idea.

0

Undo

ReSakic 10.09.2012 02:07

Yes it's true Syria is accused of supporting people that you can see clearly now they never did. Very clear instead to see who had the long term relationship with the fundamentalists all along. Would RT please stop calling them 'Syrian Rebels'. The foreign army is the truth.Turkey is the real brutal regime but hides behind pretending that the upper class of Turkey think they are european.

0

Undo

Kevin Bjornson (unregistered) 11.08.2012 21:35

I understand how Russia can be so confused. They don't understand that Obama is not only a Muslim, but wants to help re-create the Caliphate with Turkey again the center. Turkey is not dancing to a US tune, the US and EU are dancing to the tune generated by Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

I understand why Russia is upset with the west, for playing the Muslim card against them, from the Crimean War to anti-Soviet operations in Afghanistan to supporting Islamists in Kosovo. Now Russia is playing the Muslim card against the west by it's support of Iran.

However this strategy will backfire, whether played by the west or Russia. Because Islamists want to re-create the caliphate and will use whatever infidels who are foolish enough to cooperate. Just as Islamists exploited rivalries in infidel Spain in order to conquer Andalusia.

Rather, the western and eastern fragments of the Romna Republic should unite in an infideal alliance.
Russia should create a protectorate Kurdistan by invading eastern Turkey from military bases in Armenia.
This would give Russia a land route to the Mediterranean provided that Georgia cooperates (which they might, if Georgian refugees could be re-settled in the breakaway provinces and a co-dominion established in S. Ossetia and Abkhazia).

+1

Undo

View all comments (40)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us